Introduction of the Wildlife Protection Amendment Bill, 2013 in India

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The Wildlife Protection (Amendment) Bill, 2013 aims to strengthen wildlife law enforcement in India and align national legislation with CITES obligations. However, critics argue that the bill lacks accountability mechanisms for Gram Sabha consultations in Scheduled Areas and that increased penalties for crimes in tiger reserves may paradoxically lower conviction rates. Further concerns are raised regarding the potential for bureaucratic interference in scientific research and the disproportionate criminalization of minor permit violations.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The Wildlife Protection (Amendment) Bill, 2013 seeks to enhance wildlife protection through stricter enforcement, including prohibitions on animal traps, new permit requirements for scientific research, increased penalties for offenses, and the inclusion of flora and fauna lists to meet India's obligations under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES).
  • There are concerns regarding the lack of monitoring mechanisms for consultations with the Gram Sabha before declaring a Scheduled Area as a National Park, which may result in accountability gaps.
  • The bill increases penalties for hunting or altering boundaries in tiger reserves to a minimum of 7 years imprisonment and fines between 5 lakh and 30 lakh rupees; however, critics suggest these harsh penalties may deter courts from sentencing, thereby reducing conviction rates.
  • Lion conservationists have expressed dissatisfaction that the proposed amendments specifically target tiger reserves, despite both the Indian tiger and the Asiatic lion being listed as endangered by the International Union for Conservation of Nature.
  • The empowerment of the Chief Wildlife Warden to grant scientific research permits is criticized for potentially allowing bureaucratic interference in ecological research and for imposing severe penalties, such as a minimum of 3 years imprisonment, for minor permit or trespass violations.

Cite the original document

APA
Henderson, I. (2013). Introduction of the Wildlife Protection Amendment Bill, 2013 in India. Natural Justice. https://naturaljustice.org/introduction-of-the-wildlife-protection-amendment-bill-2013-in-india/
Chicago
Henderson, Ian. Introduction of the Wildlife Protection Amendment Bill, 2013 in India. Natural Justice, 2013. https://naturaljustice.org/introduction-of-the-wildlife-protection-amendment-bill-2013-in-india/.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Henderson |first1=Ian |title=Introduction of the Wildlife Protection Amendment Bill, 2013 in India |publisher=Natural Justice |date=5 October 2013 |url=https://naturaljustice.org/introduction-of-the-wildlife-protection-amendment-bill-2013-in-india/ |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{henderson2013introduction, author = {Henderson, Ian}, title = {{Introduction of the Wildlife Protection Amendment Bill, 2013 in India}}, institution = {Natural Justice}, year = {2013}, month = oct, url = {https://naturaljustice.org/introduction-of-the-wildlife-protection-amendment-bill-2013-in-india/}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated