Strategien zur Verbesserung der globalen Informationslandschaft

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The IPIE analyzed 4,798 peer-reviewed publications, including a systematic review of 588 articles and a meta-analysis of 43 experiments, to evaluate strategies for improving the global information environment. The findings establish a scientific consensus that content labeling and corrective information are effective in reducing the impact of misinformation on user perceptions. While other interventions such as content moderation and media literacy are plausible, there is less consensus on their effectiveness due to inconsistent study designs and a lack of measurable impact data. The report highlights significant research gaps, noting that most studies are published in English and focus on Western countries, and calls for more standardized definitions, better access to platform data, and more diverse, multilingual research to better understand the global information landscape.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • There is an emerging scientific consensus that content labeling and the provision of corrective information are effective at reducing the impact of misinformation on how users perceive information.
  • While other countermeasures are considered plausible, there is significantly less scientific consensus regarding their actual effectiveness.
  • The current body of research is limited by a lack of standardized metrics and definitions, with fewer than one-fifth of the reviewed studies providing measurable impacts for their proposed countermeasures.
  • Research on misinformation is heavily skewed toward English-language publications and Western contexts, leaving a gap in understanding user experiences in other languages and non-Western regions.
  • Certain plausible strategies, specifically media literacy campaigns and redirecting users to correct information, have received substantially less research attention, particularly within the natural and health sciences.

Cite the original document

APA
International Panel on the Information Environment (2023). Strategien zur Verbesserung der globalen Informationslandschaft. https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/643ecb10be528d2c1da863cb/6563aee3c1f564efee00be58_SFP2023.1%20-%20DE.pdf
Chicago
International Panel on the Information Environment. Strategien zur Verbesserung der globalen Informationslandschaft. 2023. https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/643ecb10be528d2c1da863cb/6563aee3c1f564efee00be58_SFP2023.1%20-%20DE.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=International Panel on the Information Environment |title=Strategien zur Verbesserung der globalen Informationslandschaft |date=2023 |url=https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/643ecb10be528d2c1da863cb/6563aee3c1f564efee00be58_SFP2023.1%20-%20DE.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{internationalpanelontheinformationenvironment2023strategien, author = {{International Panel on the Information Environment}}, title = {{Strategien zur Verbesserung der globalen Informationslandschaft}}, institution = {International Panel on the Information Environment}, year = {2023}, url = {https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/643ecb10be528d2c1da863cb/6563aee3c1f564efee00be58_SFP2023.1%20-%20DE.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated