Stratégies pour améliorer l'environnement mondial de l'information

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The report identifies a growing scientific consensus that content labeling and corrective information are effective at reducing the impact of disinformation on user perceptions. While other strategies like content moderation and media literacy are plausible, their effectiveness remains uncertain. The document emphasizes a critical need for more transnational, multilingual research and standardized metrics to improve the global information environment.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • There is an emerging scientific consensus that two specific design solutions—content labeling and the publication of corrective information—are effective in reducing the effects of disinformation on user perceptions.
  • While several other countermeasures are considered plausible, their actual effectiveness is not unanimously agreed upon or remains uncertain. These include content or account moderation, information and media literacy, advertising policy changes, content reporting, user content sharing limits, disclosure, redirection, security/verification requirements, and self-fact-checking.
  • Current research on disinformation countermeasures is heavily skewed toward English-language publications and Western countries, leaving a gap in knowledge regarding users in other languages and regions.
  • The scientific community lacks standardized definitions and metrics for disinformation, and there is a shortage of empirical studies using real-world data that allow for the aggregation of knowledge.
  • The analysis was based on a vast collection of 4,798 peer-reviewed publications, though only 588 met the criteria for the systematic review, and only 18 publications (containing 43 experiments) met the high standards required for the meta-analysis.

Cite the original document

APA
International Panel on the Information Environment (2023). Stratégies pour améliorer l'environnement mondial de l'information. https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/643ecb10be528d2c1da863cb/6563aed47052e266959973f8_SFP2023.1%20-%20FR.pdf
Chicago
International Panel on the Information Environment. Stratégies pour améliorer l'environnement mondial de l'information. 2023. https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/643ecb10be528d2c1da863cb/6563aed47052e266959973f8_SFP2023.1%20-%20FR.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=International Panel on the Information Environment |title=Stratégies pour améliorer l'environnement mondial de l'information |date=2023 |url=https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/643ecb10be528d2c1da863cb/6563aed47052e266959973f8_SFP2023.1%20-%20FR.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{internationalpanelontheinformationenvironment2023stratgies, author = {{International Panel on the Information Environment}}, title = {{Stratégies pour améliorer l'environnement mondial de l'information}}, institution = {International Panel on the Information Environment}, year = {2023}, url = {https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/643ecb10be528d2c1da863cb/6563aed47052e266959973f8_SFP2023.1%20-%20FR.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated