Use of Indicators in Policy Analysis Annotated Training Module

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document outlines how sustainability indicators function within the policy cycle—planning, implementation, evaluation, and adaptive learning—to move beyond mere data collection toward informed decision-making. It warns against the 'symbolic' or 'tactical' use of indicators and emphasizes that their success depends on integration into governance processes. Two primary case studies are presented: Canada's Agricultural Policy Framework (APF), which uses agri-environmental indicators (AEIs) and the Canadian Regional Agricultural Model (CRAM) to track goals for water, soil, air, and biodiversity; and the Energy Sustainability Gauge, a web-based tool developed with TERI in India to assess energy efficiency, security, access, and clean technology through a visual dashboard and a Policy Implementation Card (PIC).

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Indicators are not automatic drivers of policy change and can be used for non-instrumental purposes, such as 'Political use' to support predetermined positions, 'Symbolic use' to provide ritualistic assurance, or 'Tactical use' as a delaying tactic to substitute for action.
  • Effective use of indicators requires integrating them into the governance process rather than treating them as external tools; they should help assimilate stakeholder views, guide policy decisions, and facilitate a cycle of adaptive learning.
  • Canada's Agricultural Policy Framework (APF), launched via the June 2001 Whitehorse Agreement, employs a goal-driven approach to achieve environmental outcomes in water, air, soil quality, and bio-diversity.
  • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) developed the National Agri-Environmental Health Analysis and Reporting Program (NAHARP) to maintain three types of indicators: state indicators (impacts/risks), pressure indicators (environmental stresses), and response indicators (management options used by producers).
  • The Canadian Regional Agricultural Model (CRAM) integrates agri-environmental indicators with economic models to estimate future changes resulting from alternative policies and to help identify achievable targets.
  • The Energy Sustainability Gauge is a communication and analysis tool that assesses energy sustainability across four objectives: efficient production/consumption, security of supply, equitable access, and the use of clean technologies.
  • The Energy Sustainability Gauge evaluates policy implementation using a Policy Implementation Card (PIC) that scores a mix of economic, regulatory, expenditure, and institutional instruments on a scale from 0 (not considered) to 6 (monitoring and feedback with improvement).
  • The Energy Sustainability Gauge applies four guiding principles for assessment: saliency (will anyone care?), legitimacy (can people trust it?), credibility (can people believe it?), and usability (can people understand it?).

Cite the original document

APA
Pintér, L., Swanson, D., & Barr, J. E. (2004). Use of Indicators in Policy Analysis Annotated Training Module. International Institute for Sustainable Development. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/measure_use_indicators.pdf
Chicago
Pintér, László, Darren Swanson, and Jane E. Barr. Use of Indicators in Policy Analysis Annotated Training Module. International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2004. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/measure_use_indicators.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Pintér |first1=László |last2=Swanson |first2=Darren |last3=Barr |first3=Jane E. |title=Use of Indicators in Policy Analysis Annotated Training Module |publisher=International Institute for Sustainable Development |date=March 2004 |url=https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/measure_use_indicators.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{pintr2004use, author = {Pintér, László and Swanson, Darren and Barr, Jane E.}, title = {{Use of Indicators in Policy Analysis Annotated Training Module}}, institution = {International Institute for Sustainable Development}, year = {2004}, month = mar, url = {https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/measure_use_indicators.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated