Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The United Kingdom ranks last among G20 OECD member countries in the G20 Scorecard of Fossil Fuel Funding, with an overall score of 48/100. While overall support decreased by 21% compared to 20142016, the U.K. saw a 96% increase in public finance for fossil fuels and an 86% increase in support for coal production. The U.K. provides USD 9.2 billion annually in support for fossil fuel consumers through foregone tax revenue and has faced criticism for a lack of transparency regarding its export credit agency, UKEF, and its denial of providing fossil fuel subsidies under its own definitions.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The United Kingdom ranks 11th out of 11 G20 OECD member countries with an overall score of 48/100, characterized by a lack of transparency and significant support for fossil fuel consumers via USD 9.2 billion in annual foregone tax revenue.
  • Public financial support for fossil fuels in the U.K. increased by 96% relative to the 20142016 average. U.K. Export Finance (UKEF) provided 97% of its energy support to fossil fuels between 2010 and 2017, including USD 2.6 billion in the 20182019 fiscal year and USD 970 million in 20192020.
  • Despite a commitment to phase out coal by 2025, the U.K. increased support for coal production by 86% relative to 20142016 (to USD 2.1 million annually) and increased support for fossil fuel-based power by 403% (to USD 635 million annually).
  • The U.K. government's USD 35 billion road-building and repair program, confirmed as part of COVID-19 support, may offset emissions savings that would have been achieved through electric and low-emission vehicles.
  • The U.K. is described as lacking transparency, as it denies providing fossil fuel subsidies under its own definition, provides little transparency regarding UKEF projects, and has not committed to a G20 OECD peer review.

Cite the original document

APA
Picciariello, A. (2020). G20 Scorecard of Fossil Fuel Funding. International Institute for Sustainable Development. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2020-11/g20-scorecard-united-kingdom.pdf
Chicago
Picciariello, Angela. G20 Scorecard of Fossil Fuel Funding. International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2020. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2020-11/g20-scorecard-united-kingdom.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Picciariello |first1=Angela |title=G20 Scorecard of Fossil Fuel Funding |publisher=International Institute for Sustainable Development |date=2020 |url=https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2020-11/g20-scorecard-united-kingdom.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{picciariello2020g20, author = {Picciariello, Angela}, title = {{G20 Scorecard of Fossil Fuel Funding}}, institution = {International Institute for Sustainable Development}, year = {2020}, url = {https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2020-11/g20-scorecard-united-kingdom.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated