Browse all documents

Analyser les lois nationales sur l’investissement : fonction de règlement des litiges

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

This executive summary, published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) in April 2026, analyzes the dispute settlement functions within 167 national investment laws. It examines the prevalence of dispute prevention, management, and settlement (PGRD) provisions, highlighting the risks associated with 'prior consent' to arbitration and providing a framework for policymakers to reform national investment laws to minimize legal and financial risks.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • An analysis of 167 national investment laws shows that dispute prevention, management, and settlement (PGRD) functions are common, appearing in nearly 79% of the laws studied. This prevalence is highest in Africa at 91% and Asia at 84%.
  • National courts and arbitration are frequently cited in laws with PGRD functions. Approximately 57% of these laws explicitly mention national courts, while 69% refer to arbitration, although arbitration is never the primary method designated.
  • Among laws that refer to arbitration, 44% include 'prior consent,' a practice that the report warns reproduces the significant financial and regulatory risks associated with investor-State dispute settlement via treaties.
  • Non-jurisdictional alternative mechanisms are less common: 42% of laws allow methods agreed upon by parties (more frequent in Asia and Africa), 39% provide for administrative review, and 32% mention amicable settlement through negotiation or mediation.
  • The report strongly advises states against including prior consent to international arbitration in investment laws. It suggests that if arbitration is necessary, it should be handled via case-by-case agreements or specific contracts rather than unilateral consent to an undefined category of investors, which creates uncontrollable legal and financial risks.

Cite the original document

APA
Ostřanský, J., Nweke-Eze, S. U., & Manikantan, A. (2026). Analyser les lois nationales sur l’investissement : fonction de règlement des litiges. International Institute for Sustainable Development. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2026-05/national-investment-laws-dispute-settlement-summary-fr.pdf
Chicago
Ostřanský, Josef, Stanley U. Nweke-Eze, and Abhishree Manikantan. Analyser les lois nationales sur l’investissement : fonction de règlement des litiges. International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2026. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2026-05/national-investment-laws-dispute-settlement-summary-fr.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Ostřanský |first1=Josef |last2=Nweke-Eze |first2=Stanley U. |last3=Manikantan |first3=Abhishree |title=Analyser les lois nationales sur l’investissement : fonction de règlement des litiges |publisher=International Institute for Sustainable Development |date=April 2026 |url=https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2026-05/national-investment-laws-dispute-settlement-summary-fr.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{ostansk2026analyser, author = {Ostřanský, Josef and Nweke-Eze, Stanley U. and Manikantan, Abhishree}, title = {{Analyser les lois nationales sur l’investissement : fonction de règlement des litiges}}, institution = {International Institute for Sustainable Development}, year = {2026}, month = apr, url = {https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2026-05/national-investment-laws-dispute-settlement-summary-fr.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated