THREE DISTRIBUTED WATER STORAGE OPTIONS FOR MANITOBA

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The infographic compares three water storage options for Manitoba: expanded ditches, filter fields and ponds, and back-filled dams. It evaluates each based on capital and operating costs against benefits such as flood mitigation, drought avoidance, carbon credits, and nutrient management. Back-filled dams show the highest benefit/cost ratio at 371%, followed by expanded ditches at 194% and filter fields and ponds at 128%.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Option I (Expanded Ditches) uses drainage systems to capture runoff and nutrients for irrigation and biomass production via cattail crops. It provides a total annual net benefit of $146,988 and a benefit/cost ratio of 194%, with total monetized benefits of $303,024 against total monetized costs of $156,037.
  • Option II (Filter Fields and Ponds) utilizes retention ponds on farmland to capture nutrient-rich runoff for recycling and biomass growth. This option results in a total annual net benefit of $32,884 and a benefit/cost ratio of 128%.
  • Option III (Back Flooded Dams) involves building perimeter berms around agricultural lands to capture spring runoff for livestock support or soil absorption. It has the highest benefit/cost ratio of the three options at 371%, with a total annual net benefit of $32,302.
  • The analysis identifies several co-benefits across the options, including the production of carbon credits, the creation of new wetland habitat, and the reduction of eutrophication through phosphorus capture.

Cite the original document

APA
Dion, J., & McCandless, M. (n.d.). THREE DISTRIBUTED WATER STORAGE OPTIONS FOR MANITOBA. International Institute for Sustainable Development. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/distributed_water_storage_options_infographic.pdf
Chicago
Dion, Jason, and Matthew McCandless. THREE DISTRIBUTED WATER STORAGE OPTIONS FOR MANITOBA. International Institute for Sustainable Development, n.d. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/distributed_water_storage_options_infographic.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Dion |first1=Jason |last2=McCandless |first2=Matthew |title=THREE DISTRIBUTED WATER STORAGE OPTIONS FOR MANITOBA |publisher=International Institute for Sustainable Development |url=https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/distributed_water_storage_options_infographic.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{dionndthree, author = {Dion, Jason and McCandless, Matthew}, title = {{THREE DISTRIBUTED WATER STORAGE OPTIONS FOR MANITOBA}}, institution = {International Institute for Sustainable Development}, url = {https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/distributed_water_storage_options_infographic.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated