中国低碳竞争力与国家级经济技术开发区

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document analyzes three Chinese national pilot programs for industrial parks: Eco-industrial Parks (EIP), Circular Transformation of Industrial Parks (CTIP), and Low-carbon Industrial Parks. It compares their administrative processes, performance indicators, and contributions to carbon reduction, noting that while these programs are voluntary, they provide significant financial and capacity-building incentives for parks to transition from growth-oriented to environment-balanced models.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The Eco-industrial Park (EIP) program categorizes parks into three types: sector-specific, comprehensive, and venous (circular) industrial parks. By 2014, 94 parks had been approved as pilots, with 31 achieving the official national demonstration designation.
  • Unlike the EIP program, the Circular Transformation of Industrial Parks (CTIP) provides direct national financial subsidies. In 2012 alone, 745 million RMB was allocated to 22 industrial parks, averaging 182 million RMB per park, which represented approximately 8.5% of the total investment.
  • The Low-carbon Industrial Park pilot, launched in September 2013, focuses specifically on greenhouse gas emission data, including emission intensity and totals, with a goal of reaching 80 pilot parks by 2015.
  • The indicator systems vary in flexibility: EIP standards use fixed threshold values regardless of a park's history, whereas CTIP allows parks to submit their own target values for government approval, leading to wide variations in targets between different regions.
  • Industrial parks face significant barriers to low-carbon transition, primarily a lack of technical capacity and professional expertise, as evidenced by a survey of 210 senior officials from 51 national industrial parks.

Cite the original document

APA
铁云柏, & 戴夫•索耶 (2015). 中国低碳竞争力与国家级经济技术开发区. International Institute for Sustainable Development. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/development-eco-efficient-industrial-parks-china-review-cn.pdf
Chicago
铁云柏, and 戴夫•索耶. 中国低碳竞争力与国家级经济技术开发区. International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2015. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/development-eco-efficient-industrial-parks-china-review-cn.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=铁云柏 |last2=戴夫•索耶 |title=中国低碳竞争力与国家级经济技术开发区 |publisher=International Institute for Sustainable Development |date=March 2015 |url=https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/development-eco-efficient-industrial-parks-china-review-cn.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{2015, author = {铁云柏 and 戴夫•索耶}, title = {{中国低碳竞争力与国家级经济技术开发区}}, institution = {International Institute for Sustainable Development}, year = {2015}, month = mar, url = {https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/development-eco-efficient-industrial-parks-china-review-cn.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated