Browse all documents

Prioritizing “No Significant Harm” over “Reasonable and Equitable” in Governance of Aquifers

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

This commentary examines the governance of transboundary aquifers, arguing that the principle of "no significant harm" should be prioritized over "reasonable and equitable use" in management negotiations.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The author argues that in the governance of transboundary aquifers, the principle of "no significant harm" should be given priority over the principle of "reasonable and equitable use."
  • Two pre-eminent principles in transboundary aquifer governance are the requirement to reduce significant harm to other aquifer portions and related natural resources, and the requirement to ensure water use is reasonable and equitable compared to other users and uses.
  • Achieving a balance between the principles of "no significant harm" and "reasonable and equitable use" is difficult, as it is often unclear which principle should take priority or under what constraints.

Cite the original document

APA
Brooks (2015). Prioritizing “No Significant Harm” over “Reasonable and Equitable” in Governance of Aquifers. International Institute for Sustainable Development. https://www.iisd.org/articles/policy-analysis/prioritizing-no-significant-harm-over-reasonable-and-equitable-governance
Chicago
Brooks. Prioritizing “No Significant Harm” over “Reasonable and Equitable” in Governance of Aquifers. International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2015. https://www.iisd.org/articles/policy-analysis/prioritizing-no-significant-harm-over-reasonable-and-equitable-governance.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Brooks |title=Prioritizing “No Significant Harm” over “Reasonable and Equitable” in Governance of Aquifers |publisher=International Institute for Sustainable Development |date=20 March 2015 |url=https://www.iisd.org/articles/policy-analysis/prioritizing-no-significant-harm-over-reasonable-and-equitable-governance |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{brooks2015prioritizing, author = {Brooks}, title = {{Prioritizing “No Significant Harm” over “Reasonable and Equitable” in Governance of Aquifers}}, institution = {International Institute for Sustainable Development}, year = {2015}, month = mar, url = {https://www.iisd.org/articles/policy-analysis/prioritizing-no-significant-harm-over-reasonable-and-equitable-governance}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated