Prioritizing “No Significant Harm” over “Reasonable and Equitable” in Governance of Aquifers

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document examines the tension between two pre-eminent principles of transboundary aquifer governance: the requirement to reduce "significant harm" to other portions of the aquifer and the goal of ensuring "reasonable and equitable" water use. The author suggests that the former should take priority and utilizes case studies of the al-Disi and Ogallala aquifers to explore the constraints and issues associated with balancing these principles.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Transboundary aquifer management is dominated by two primary principles: the obligation to minimize significant harm to the aquifer and related resources, and the requirement that water use be reasonable and equitable relative to other users and uses.
  • Achieving a balance between the principles of 'no significant harm' and 'reasonable and equitable use' is difficult, as it is often unclear which principle should be prioritized or under what constraints.

Cite the original document

APA
Brooks (2015). Prioritizing “No Significant Harm” over “Reasonable and Equitable” in Governance of Aquifers. International Institute for Sustainable Development. https://www.iisd.org/articles/policy-analysis/prioritizing-no-significant-harm-over-reasonable-and-equitable-governance
Chicago
Brooks. Prioritizing “No Significant Harm” over “Reasonable and Equitable” in Governance of Aquifers. International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2015. https://www.iisd.org/articles/policy-analysis/prioritizing-no-significant-harm-over-reasonable-and-equitable-governance.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Brooks |title=Prioritizing “No Significant Harm” over “Reasonable and Equitable” in Governance of Aquifers |publisher=International Institute for Sustainable Development |date=20 March 2015 |url=https://www.iisd.org/articles/policy-analysis/prioritizing-no-significant-harm-over-reasonable-and-equitable-governance |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{brooks2015prioritizing, author = {Brooks}, title = {{Prioritizing “No Significant Harm” over “Reasonable and Equitable” in Governance of Aquifers}}, institution = {International Institute for Sustainable Development}, year = {2015}, month = mar, url = {https://www.iisd.org/articles/policy-analysis/prioritizing-no-significant-harm-over-reasonable-and-equitable-governance}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated