Comparative Commentary to Brazil’s Cooperation and Investment Facilitation Agreements (CIFAs) with Mozambique, Angola, Mexico, and Malawi

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document analyzes Brazil's Cooperation and Investment Facilitation Agreements (CIFAs), contrasting them with traditional bilateral investment treaties by emphasizing cooperation and state-state dispute settlement over investor-state arbitration.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Brazil's CIFAs differ from traditional bilateral investment treaties (BITs) because they prioritize cooperation and investment facilitation rather than investor protection.
  • The CIFAs avoid investor-state arbitration, instead promoting amicable dispute prevention and settlement, with state-state dispute settlement serving as a secondary option.
  • The Brazilian C IFA model provides an alternative for governments seeking to minimize the risks associated with arbitration while maintaining mechanisms to resolve investor disagreements.

Cite the original document

APA
Brauch,, N. B.-O. D. B. D. (2015). Comparative Commentary to Brazil’s Cooperation and Investment Facilitation Agreements (CIFAs) with Mozambique, Angola, Mexico, and Malawi. International Institute for Sustainable Development. https://www.iisd.org/articles/policy-analysis/comparative-commentary-brazils-cooperation-and-investment-facilitation
Chicago
Brauch,, Nathalie Bernasconi-Osterwalder,Martin Dietrich Brauch,Martin Dietrich. Comparative Commentary to Brazil’s Cooperation and Investment Facilitation Agreements (CIFAs) with Mozambique, Angola, Mexico, and Malawi. International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2015. https://www.iisd.org/articles/policy-analysis/comparative-commentary-brazils-cooperation-and-investment-facilitation.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Brauch, |first1=Nathalie Bernasconi-Osterwalder,Martin Dietrich Brauch,Martin Dietrich |title=Comparative Commentary to Brazil’s Cooperation and Investment Facilitation Agreements (CIFAs) with Mozambique, Angola, Mexico, and Malawi |publisher=International Institute for Sustainable Development |date=11 September 2015 |url=https://www.iisd.org/articles/policy-analysis/comparative-commentary-brazils-cooperation-and-investment-facilitation |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{brauch2015comparative, author = {Brauch,, Nathalie Bernasconi-Osterwalder,Martin Dietrich Brauch,Martin Dietrich}, title = {{Comparative Commentary to Brazil’s Cooperation and Investment Facilitation Agreements (CIFAs) with Mozambique, Angola, Mexico, and Malawi}}, institution = {International Institute for Sustainable Development}, year = {2015}, month = sep, url = {https://www.iisd.org/articles/policy-analysis/comparative-commentary-brazils-cooperation-and-investment-facilitation}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated