Browse all documents

The Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity: A new approach to trade and economic engagement

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity (IPEF) is a flexible, non-traditional economic initiative launched by the United States in May 2022 with 13 partner countries. Unlike traditional free trade agreements, the IPEF eschews tariff liberalization and market access, focusing instead on four pillars: a connected economy, a resilient economy, a clean economy, and a fair economy. While the initiative aims to reassert U.S. influence in the region, it faces challenges regarding the willingness of partners to commit to high standards and criticisms over the lack of U.S. concessions.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The IPEF is structured around four distinct pillars: a 'Connected economy' covering digital, environment, and labour issues; a 'Resilient economy' focusing on supply chain cooperation; a 'Clean economy' targeting decarbonization and infrastructure; and a 'Fair economy' addressing taxation and anti-corruption. The U.S. Trade Representative oversees the first pillar, while the U.S. Department of Commerce manages the remaining three.
  • The framework differs from traditional free trade agreements because it does not aim to reduce tariffs or enhance market access. This approach was adopted by the Biden administration to avoid backlash from labour and environmental groups who opposed previous deals like the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership.
  • Early negotiations indicate potential friction regarding the adoption of high standards. During the July 2022 ministerial, countries including Malaysia and Japan emphasized the necessity of transition and grace periods for binding commitments, suggesting a reluctance to meet certain political or practical standards.
  • The credibility and durability of the IPEF have been questioned due to two primary factors: the U.S. refusal to negotiate tariff liberalization—despite having leverage over tariff peaks of nearly 40% on goods like Vietnamese textiles and footwear—and the decision to conduct negotiations without congressional consent.

Cite the original document

APA
Benson, E., & Reynolds, G. (2022). The Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity: A new approach to trade and economic engagement. International Institute for Sustainable Development. https://www.iisd.org/articles/policy-analysis/indo-pacific-economic-framework
Chicago
Benson, Emily, and Grant Reynolds. The Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity: A new approach to trade and economic engagement. International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2022. https://www.iisd.org/articles/policy-analysis/indo-pacific-economic-framework.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Benson |first1=Emily |last2=Reynolds |first2=Grant |title=The Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity: A new approach to trade and economic engagement |publisher=International Institute for Sustainable Development |date=25 September 2022 |url=https://www.iisd.org/articles/policy-analysis/indo-pacific-economic-framework |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{benson2022indopacific, author = {Benson, Emily and Reynolds, Grant}, title = {{The Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity: A new approach to trade and economic engagement}}, institution = {International Institute for Sustainable Development}, year = {2022}, month = sep, url = {https://www.iisd.org/articles/policy-analysis/indo-pacific-economic-framework}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated