Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The submission argues that the OECD's GloBE rules (Pillar Two) are undemocratic and provide insufficient revenue for Global South countries, potentially legitimizing a low 15% corporate tax rate. While opposing the bill, the authors propose lowering the Qualifying Domestic Minimum Top-Up Tax (QDMTT) threshold to cover more multinational enterprises (MNEs) and including the Undertaxed Payments Rule (UTPR) to claw back tax losses from profit shifting. They advocate for a UN-based intergovernmental process for international tax cooperation as a more transparent and just alternative.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The current threshold for the Qualifying Domestic Minimum Top-Up Tax (QDMTT) is set at multinational enterprises (MNEs) with consolidated annual revenue of EUR 750mn (R15.4bn), which covers only 17 of the 243 MNEs headquartered in South Africa (approximately 7.3%).
  • The authors propose lowering the QDMTT threshold to ensure no multinational pays less than 15% tax in South Africa, arguing that a 15% rate is not a meaningful deterrent to investment compared to infrastructure and socio-economic factors.
  • The Draft Bill currently omits the Undertaxed Payments Rule (UTPR), which the authors recommend including to allow South Africa to claw back tax losses from cross-border profit shifting to low-tax jurisdictions starting 1 January 2025.
  • The implementation of the GloBE rules 'by reference' is criticized for compromising public and parliamentary oversight, as future updates to OECD Commentary or Guidance would automatically apply to South African tax policy without legislative process.
  • The authors argue that the OECD's Two Pillar framework is insufficient for developing countries, citing a 2024 Budget estimate of only R8bn in revenue for South Africa, which is far below the estimated R100bn lost to illicit financial flows.
  • The document contends that the GloBE rule order favors Global North countries because the Income Inclusion Rule (IIR) gives the primary right to tax undertaxed profits to the jurisdiction where the Ultimate Parent Entity resides.
  • The authors advocate for the UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation as a more democratic and transparent alternative to the OECD's Inclusive Framework, which they describe as a platform for rubber-stamping agendas developed by wealthy nations.

Cite the original document

APA
Institute for Economic Justice (2024). Submission: Draft Global Minimum Tax Bill. https://iej.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Global-Minimum-Tax-Bill-Submission.pdf
Chicago
Institute for Economic Justice. Submission: Draft Global Minimum Tax Bill. 2024. https://iej.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Global-Minimum-Tax-Bill-Submission.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite press release |author=Institute for Economic Justice |title=Submission: Draft Global Minimum Tax Bill |date=28 March 2024 |url=https://iej.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Global-Minimum-Tax-Bill-Submission.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@misc{instituteforeconomicjustice2024submission, author = {{Institute for Economic Justice}}, title = {{Submission: Draft Global Minimum Tax Bill}}, publisher = {Institute for Economic Justice}, year = {2024}, month = mar, url = {https://iej.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Global-Minimum-Tax-Bill-Submission.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated