Management response to the Independent Evaluation of the GCF Approach to Gender

The GCF Secretariat provides a detailed response to an independent evaluation of its gender approach, agreeing with several recommendations to shift from a compliance-driven model to one focused on meaningful implementation and results. While the Secretariat accepts the need for stronger institutional coherence, improved budget tracking, and enhanced capacity building, it disputes certain factual assumptions in the evaluation—specifically the reference to a non-existent 2018 GESI Policy—and rejects the introduction of mandatory mid-term Gender Action Plan updates due to the burden they would place on Accredited Entities.

• The Secretariat intends to establish a centralized accountability architecture for the Gender Policy and the 2026–2031 Gender Action Plan (GAP) through an intra-Secretariat Steering Committee overseen by the Executive Leadership Team.
• The Secretariat disputes a factual claim in the evaluation regarding a "2018 Gender Equality and Social Inclusion (GESI) Policy," stating that no such policy was ever approved by the Board and that the evaluation's conclusions based on it are incorrect.
• To improve financial visibility, the Secretariat will introduce gender budget tagging to monitor resource allocation against the five priorities of the updated GAP, with annual reporting to the Board.
• The Secretariat rejects the recommendation to require mandatory mid-term updates of project-level Gender Action Plans (GAPs) with Secretariat clearance, arguing this would create excessive budgetary and capacity burdens for Accredited Entities (AEs).
• The GCF is moving away from a 'co-benefits' approach to gender reporting in favor of a Harmonized Results Management Framework (HRMF) that mainstreams gender-relevant outcomes and outputs through standardized indicators and mandatory sex disaggregation.
• The Secretariat plans to update its 2017 Mainstreaming Gender Guidelines and Toolkit to align with the 2019 Gender Policy and the 2026–2031 GAP for dissemination to staff, NDAs, and AEs.

APA

Green Climate Fund (2026). Management response to the Independent Evaluation of the GCF Approach to Gender. https://www.greenclimate.fund/sites/default/files/documents/2026-06/20b-independent-evaluation-gcf-approach-gender-addendum-i-management-response-gcfb4514add01.pdf

Chicago

Green Climate Fund. Management response to the Independent Evaluation of the GCF Approach to Gender. 2026. https://www.greenclimate.fund/sites/default/files/documents/2026-06/20b-independent-evaluation-gcf-approach-gender-addendum-i-management-response-gcfb4514add01.pdf.

Wikipedia

{{cite report |author=Green Climate Fund |title=Management response to the Independent Evaluation of the GCF Approach to Gender |date=23 June 2026 |url=https://www.greenclimate.fund/sites/default/files/documents/2026-06/20b-independent-evaluation-gcf-approach-gender-addendum-i-management-response-gcfb4514add01.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}

BibTeX

@techreport{greenclimatefund2026management, author = {{Green Climate Fund}}, title = {{Management response to the Independent Evaluation of the GCF Approach to Gender}}, institution = {Green Climate Fund}, year = {2026}, month = jun, url = {https://www.greenclimate.fund/sites/default/files/documents/2026-06/20b-independent-evaluation-gcf-approach-gender-addendum-i-management-response-gcfb4514add01.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }