Browse all documents

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

This annex provides a detailed overview of sustainability schemes targeting the mining sector, categorizing them by their supply chain target and outlining their specific requirements for biodiversity and forest conservation.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Sustainability schemes for the mining and processing sector include the ICMM's Mining Principles, adopted by 12 of the top-20 companies, which requires avoiding World Heritage Sites and respecting protected areas to achieve no net loss of biodiversity. The Mining Association of Canada's Toward Sustainable Mining (TSM) is adopted by 7 of the top-20 companies and utilizes a Biodiversity Conservation Management Protocol to manage biodiversity at mine sites via the mitigation hierarchy.
  • The Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA) Standard, adopted by 2 of the top-20 companies, requires social and environmental impact assessments covering direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts on biodiversity, ecosystem services, and protected areas. It also mandates evidence of positive relationships with local communities and Indigenous Peoples or the assurance of Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC).
  • For the upstream supply chainC chain, the ResponsibleSteel International Standard V2.0 (launched in 2022)S) is adopted by 3 of the top-20 companies; its Principle 13 requires sites to implement a plan based on the mitigation hierarchy to manage biodiversity risks and impacts, aiming for no net loss.
  • Schemes covering theS the whole supply chain from mine to product manufacturing include the IFC's Performance Standards, the Responsible Jewelry Council's (RJC) Code of Practices, and the Aluminum Stewardship Initiative (ASI) Performance Standard. The ASI standard, adopted by 2 of the top-20 companies, requires companies to mitigate biodiversity impacts within their area of influence, including those affecting the livelihoods of affected communities.

Cite the original document

APA
Forest Declaration Assessment (n.d.). THEME 2: ANNEX FOREST DECLARATION ASSESSMENT. https://forestdeclaration.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/2022Theme2Annex.pdf
Chicago
Forest Declaration Assessment. THEME 2: ANNEX FOREST DECLARATION ASSESSMENT. n.d. https://forestdeclaration.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/2022Theme2Annex.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Forest Declaration Assessment |title=THEME 2: ANNEX FOREST DECLARATION ASSESSMENT |url=https://forestdeclaration.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/2022Theme2Annex.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{forestdeclarationassessmentndtheme, author = {{Forest Declaration Assessment}}, title = {{THEME 2: ANNEX FOREST DECLARATION ASSESSMENT}}, institution = {Forest Declaration Assessment}, url = {https://forestdeclaration.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/2022Theme2Annex.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated