COVAX un órgano mundial de múltiples partes interesadas que puede acarrear riesgos sanitarios y políticos para los países en desarrollo y el multilateralismo
Summary
The document critiques COVAX as a multi-stakeholder entity that marginalizes the World Health Organization (WHO) and replaces public health governance with a commercial banking model. It argues that COVAX is designed to protect the global pharmaceutical market and serve as a tool for geopolitical 'soft power' rather than ensuring equitable vaccine access. The author highlights that COVAX's funding mechanisms, dominated by a few wealthy nations and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, allow private interests to influence vaccine R&D and distribution, potentially risking the health and political autonomy of developing nations.
Key insights
- COVAX is characterized as operating more like a commercial bank or international financial institution than a health assistance entity, using capital to shape the global vaccine manufacturing industry and consumer markets in the Global South.
- The governance structure of COVAX effectively marginalizes the World Health Organization (WHO) by shifting decision-making power to a multi-stakeholder body where the WHO lacks a leadership role in the highest coordinating meeting.
- Funding for the COVAX Advance Market Commitment (AMC) is heavily concentrated, with governments providing 78.6% of direct donations—led by Canada, the European Commission, France, Germany, and Saudi Arabia—and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation providing 75.1% of foundation grants.
- The report argues that COVAX serves as a geopolitical tool for 'soft power' to confront China and Russia by controlling vaccine access for specific countries and peoples.
- There is a significant gap between the public narrative of 'equitable access' and the actual target of the COVAX AMC, which aims to vaccinate only 20% of the population in designated countries, despite WHO estimates that herd immunity requires 60-70% antibodies.
- COVAX's approach is criticized for treating health as a market commodity rather than a global public good, evidenced by its failure to support WTO intellectual property waivers that would allow developing countries to produce vaccines.
Cite the original document
- APA
- Gleckman, H. (2021). COVAX un órgano mundial de múltiples partes interesadas que puede acarrear riesgos sanitarios y políticos para los países en desarrollo y el multilateralismo. Friends of the Earth International. https://www.foei.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/COVAX-amigos-de-la-tierra-internacional-tni.pdf
- Chicago
- Gleckman, Harris. COVAX un órgano mundial de múltiples partes interesadas que puede acarrear riesgos sanitarios y políticos para los países en desarrollo y el multilateralismo. Friends of the Earth International, 2021. https://www.foei.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/COVAX-amigos-de-la-tierra-internacional-tni.pdf.
- Wikipedia
- {{cite report |last1=Gleckman |first1=Harris |title=COVAX un órgano mundial de múltiples partes interesadas que puede acarrear riesgos sanitarios y políticos para los países en desarrollo y el multilateralismo |publisher=Friends of the Earth International |date=March 2021 |url=https://www.foei.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/COVAX-amigos-de-la-tierra-internacional-tni.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
- BibTeX
- @techreport{gleckman2021covax, author = {Gleckman, Harris}, title = {{COVAX un órgano mundial de múltiples partes interesadas que puede acarrear riesgos sanitarios y políticos para los países en desarrollo y el multilateralismo}}, institution = {Friends of the Earth International}, year = {2021}, month = mar, url = {https://www.foei.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/COVAX-amigos-de-la-tierra-internacional-tni.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }
Full text
Collected · Record updated