What you need to know about ‘NAMA’: Why the WTO’s non-agricultural market access negotiations threaten both environment and development

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document warns that NAMA negotiations within the WTO Doha round could lead to the over-exploitation of natural resources and the deindustrialisation of developing nations. It specifically highlights risks to fisheries, forests, and minerals through 'zero-for-zero' liberalisation and the targeting of non-tariff barriers used for environmental protection. The author calls for a halt to these negotiations and an independent review of their impacts.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • NAMA negotiations put all natural resources at risk of partial or complete liberalisation, with a current focus on fish, fish products, gems, and minerals.
  • The 'zero-for-zero' approach to liberalisation in the fishery sector is criticised for ignoring the management status of resources and potentially inducing catches that exceed renewable capacity, thereby hindering sustainable development.
  • The United Arab Emirates has proposed the full liberalisation of all raw materials, including oil and forest products, suggesting that duty-free aluminium would stimulate its consumption.
  • Non-tariff barriers (NTBs) used for environmental and social welfare protection are targeted for removal, including wood product certification, trade restrictions on chemicals and viruses, and fish labelling.
  • Developing countries face risks of deindustrialisation, loss of government custom revenue, and a reduced ability to use trade measures to protect their environments or promote domestic economic diversification.
  • There is a risk that 'environmental goods' will be narrowly defined as 'end-of-pipe' pollution technologies, which would benefit Northern exports and discourage preventative measures to reduce resource use.

Cite the original document

APA
Friends of the Earth International (2004). What you need to know about ‘NAMA’: Why the WTO’s non-agricultural market access negotiations threaten both environment and development. https://www.foei.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/NAMAenvironmentFINAL.pdf
Chicago
Friends of the Earth International. What you need to know about ‘NAMA’: Why the WTO’s non-agricultural market access negotiations threaten both environment and development. 2004. https://www.foei.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/NAMAenvironmentFINAL.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Friends of the Earth International |title=What you need to know about ‘NAMA’: Why the WTO’s non-agricultural market access negotiations threaten both environment and development |date=October 2004 |url=https://www.foei.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/NAMAenvironmentFINAL.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{friendsoftheearthinternational2004what, author = {{Friends of the Earth International}}, title = {{What you need to know about ‘NAMA’: Why the WTO’s non-agricultural market access negotiations threaten both environment and development}}, institution = {Friends of the Earth International}, year = {2004}, month = oct, url = {https://www.foei.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/NAMAenvironmentFINAL.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated