Las Directrices sobre la gobernanza responsable de tenencia en una encrucijada

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document criticizes the trend of transforming the VGGT from a human rights-based framework into a corporate tool for risk management and 'greenwashing'. It argues that guides produced by entities like USAID and the G7 New Alliance shift state responsibilities to the private sector, legitimize land grabbing, and falsely equate the power of corporations with that of local communities. The signatories call for states to implement the VGGT in line with human rights obligations, establish a robust monitoring mechanism within the Committee on World Food Security (CSA), and adopt a legally binding instrument for corporations regarding human rights.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The document asserts that operational guides created by USAID, the G7 New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition in Africa, the Interlaken Group, and the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs/AFD transform the VGGT into a business tool. These guides focus on reducing economic, financial, and reputational risks for private investors rather than protecting the rights of the most vulnerable.
  • The statement argues that these guides erroneously treat states, companies, and communities as equal 'stakeholders', which obscures the specific legal obligations of the state. This approach risks transferring state duties—such as identifying legitimate tenure rights and providing judicial conflict resolution—to private companies, creating a conflict of interest.
  • The document claims that the guides promote a false 'alliance' between corporations and communities, ignoring power asymmetries. It argues that presenting private investment as a solution for food security often reduces small-scale producers to cheap labor within corporate supply chains through contract farming and management contracts.
  • The signatories demand that states implement the VGGT by enacting laws that limit large-scale land transactions, ensure Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC), and provide criminal prosecution for human rights abuses committed by companies.
  • The statement calls for the establishment of a robust monitoring mechanism within the Committee on World Food Security (CSA) to ensure accountability in the application of the VGGT, specifically mentioning the 43rd session of the CSA in 2016 as a key event for comprehensive evaluation.

Cite the original document

APA
Friends of the Earth International (2015). Las Directrices sobre la gobernanza responsable de tenencia en una encrucijada. https://www.foei.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/2015-TG-Statement_final_ES_151216.pdf
Chicago
Friends of the Earth International. Las Directrices sobre la gobernanza responsable de tenencia en una encrucijada. 2015. https://www.foei.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/2015-TG-Statement_final_ES_151216.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite press release |author=Friends of the Earth International |title=Las Directrices sobre la gobernanza responsable de tenencia en una encrucijada |date=10 December 2015 |url=https://www.foei.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/2015-TG-Statement_final_ES_151216.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@misc{friendsoftheearthinternational2015las, author = {{Friends of the Earth International}}, title = {{Las Directrices sobre la gobernanza responsable de tenencia en una encrucijada}}, publisher = {Friends of the Earth International}, year = {2015}, month = dec, url = {https://www.foei.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/2015-TG-Statement_final_ES_151216.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated