CARBON CAPTURE, UTILIZATION, AND STORAGE (CCUS) IN CLEAN INDUSTRY

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The policy brief advocates for a hierarchical approach to industrial decarbonization in the United States, prioritizing energy efficiency and electrification over carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS). It argues that CCUS should be limited to niche uses because it fails to address upstream emissions, captures only about 90 percent of CO2, and prolongs fossil fuel infrastructure. The document identifies six high-priority CCUS use cases, dividing them into long-term solutions for process emissions and bioenergy, and short-term solutions for blue hydrogen production, high-temperature heat, high-purity CO2 streams, and new efficient facilities.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Industrial decarbonization should follow a priority sequence: first, efficiency and product longevity to reduce demand; second, electrification or low-carbon fuels to replace fossil fuels; and third, CCUS for remaining emissions.
  • Electrification is preferred over CCUS because CCUS has several systemic drawbacks, including the failure to address upstream fossil fuel extraction emissions, a capture rate of only approximately 90 percent, the potential to worsen ammonia emissions, and the requirement for capital-intensive infrastructure.
  • CCUS is identified as a crucial long-term solution for two specific areas: process emissions in industries such as glass, chemicals, and cement, and the capture of CO2 from bioenergy combustion or gasification to produce low-carbon chemicals like olefins and methanol.
  • There are four short-term or temporary CCUS applications: producing blue hydrogen from refinery byproducts, addressing the one-third of U.S. industrial process heat that is currently difficult to electrify, targeting high-purity CO2 streams (which are the least expensive to capture), and maintaining low emissions at new, efficient facilities until equipment reaches the end of its life.

Cite the original document

APA
Deshpande, S. (2026). CARBON CAPTURE, UTILIZATION, AND STORAGE (CCUS) IN CLEAN INDUSTRY. Energy Innovation. https://energyinnovation.org/wp-content/uploads/Carbon-Capture-Utilization-And-Storage-Uses-In-Clean-Industry-1.pdf
Chicago
Deshpande, Sonali. CARBON CAPTURE, UTILIZATION, AND STORAGE (CCUS) IN CLEAN INDUSTRY. Energy Innovation, 2026. https://energyinnovation.org/wp-content/uploads/Carbon-Capture-Utilization-And-Storage-Uses-In-Clean-Industry-1.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Deshpande |first1=Sonali |title=CARBON CAPTURE, UTILIZATION, AND STORAGE (CCUS) IN CLEAN INDUSTRY |publisher=Energy Innovation |date=February 2026 |url=https://energyinnovation.org/wp-content/uploads/Carbon-Capture-Utilization-And-Storage-Uses-In-Clean-Industry-1.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{deshpande2026carbon, author = {Deshpande, Sonali}, title = {{CARBON CAPTURE, UTILIZATION, AND STORAGE (CCUS) IN CLEAN INDUSTRY}}, institution = {Energy Innovation}, year = {2026}, month = feb, url = {https://energyinnovation.org/wp-content/uploads/Carbon-Capture-Utilization-And-Storage-Uses-In-Clean-Industry-1.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated