Carbon Market Watch inputs on SBM022 annotated agenda and related annexes

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

Carbon Market Watch argues that the Article 6.4 Supervisory Body's current handling of conflicts of interest is insufficient, citing inconsistent declarations by expert panel members and the presence of systemic financial interests. The organization calls for the public release of the governance concept note, the exclusion of market actors from expert roles, and the implementation of independent checks on declarations.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Carbon Market Watch requests that the concept note titled “Governance arrangements for the Article 6.4 Supervisory Body and its expert panels” be made public, as it was not available on the SBM 22 agenda or call for inputs webpages at the time of writing.
  • The organization observes that conflicts of interest among expert panel members—who may be affiliated with entities having financial interests in carbon credit markets—are rarely or inconsistently declared. It cites an example of a Methodological Expert Panel (MEP) member who declared a conflict for specific items in one meeting but not in the next.
  • Carbon Market Watch asserts that systemic conflicts of interest exist when experts have financial interests in overarching standards or procedures, such as the baseline standard or the standard on non-permanence, even if they are not involved in a specific methodology.
  • To resolve these issues, the document recommends that the Supervisory Body avoid nominating experts affiliated with market actors, establish regular independent checks of declarations, and develop stronger governance mechanisms to manage conflicts.

Cite the original document

APA
Carbon Market Watch (2026). Carbon Market Watch inputs on SBM022 annotated agenda and related annexes. https://carbonmarketwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/CMW-inputs-to-SBM22-on-conflict-of-interest.pdf
Chicago
Carbon Market Watch. Carbon Market Watch inputs on SBM022 annotated agenda and related annexes. 2026. https://carbonmarketwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/CMW-inputs-to-SBM22-on-conflict-of-interest.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite press release |author=Carbon Market Watch |title=Carbon Market Watch inputs on SBM022 annotated agenda and related annexes |date=20 July 2026 |url=https://carbonmarketwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/CMW-inputs-to-SBM22-on-conflict-of-interest.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@misc{carbonmarketwatch2026carbon, author = {{Carbon Market Watch}}, title = {{Carbon Market Watch inputs on SBM022 annotated agenda and related annexes}}, publisher = {Carbon Market Watch}, year = {2026}, month = jul, url = {https://carbonmarketwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/CMW-inputs-to-SBM22-on-conflict-of-interest.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated