Joint letter to the European Commission on the ban of HFCs in the shipping sector

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

A coalition of environmental NGOs is calling on the European Commission to implement subsector-specific "placing on the market" (POM) prohibitions for new HFC-based equipment in the shipping sector. The letter argues that current recovery and containment measures are insufficient, noting leakage rates in the current fleet can reach up to 200% annually. The coalition asserts that applying containment and recovery measures could reduce maritime HFC emissions by 40% by 2020 compared to business-as-usual, at a cost of €22/tonne, which is lower than the average cost of other HFC reduction measures.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The coalition advocates for subsector-specific "placing on the market" (POM) prohibitions for new HFC-based equipment in the maritime sector, arguing these are the only way to ensure HFC elimination where technically feasible, cost-effective, energy-efficient, and safe alternatives exist.
  • The maritime sector currently experiences extremely high HFC leakage rates, with some equipment requiring refilling twice within a single year (up to 200%).
  • Implementing containment and recovery measures for equipment already on the market is estimated to reduce maritime HFC emissions by 40% by 2020 compared to business-as-usual (BAU).
  • The cost of applying containment and recovery measures in the maritime sector is estimated at €22/tonne, which is lower than the average cost of €41/tonne for other HFC reduction measures.
  • The coalition notes that neither the current EU work program nor the International Maritime Organization (IMO) have plans to address HFCs at present.

Cite the original document

APA
Dings, J., Filzmoser, E., & Perry, C. (2012). Joint letter to the European Commission on the ban of HFCs in the shipping sector. Carbon Market Watch. https://carbonmarketwatch.org/publications/joint-letter-to-the-european-commission-on-the-ban-of-hfcs-in-the-shipping-sector/
Chicago
Dings, Jos, Eva Filzmoser, and Clare Perry. Joint letter to the European Commission on the ban of HFCs in the shipping sector. Carbon Market Watch, 2012. https://carbonmarketwatch.org/publications/joint-letter-to-the-european-commission-on-the-ban-of-hfcs-in-the-shipping-sector/.
Wikipedia
{{cite press release |last1=Dings |first1=Jos |last2=Filzmoser |first2=Eva |last3=Perry |first3=Clare |title=Joint letter to the European Commission on the ban of HFCs in the shipping sector |publisher=Carbon Market Watch |date=5 September 2012 |url=https://carbonmarketwatch.org/publications/joint-letter-to-the-european-commission-on-the-ban-of-hfcs-in-the-shipping-sector/ |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@misc{dings2012joint, author = {Dings, Jos and Filzmoser, Eva and Perry, Clare}, title = {{Joint letter to the European Commission on the ban of HFCs in the shipping sector}}, publisher = {Carbon Market Watch}, year = {2012}, month = sep, url = {https://carbonmarketwatch.org/publications/joint-letter-to-the-european-commission-on-the-ban-of-hfcs-in-the-shipping-sector/}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated