joint-ngo-letter-to-fisheries-committee-meps-highlighting-main-concerns-about-emff-coll-en-0d9676fb524fae5a.pdf

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document argues that the post-2020 European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF), which allocates over 6 billion euros for 2021-2027, must not include harmful subsidies. The authors highlight that 69% of European fish stocks are overfished and that re-introducing subsidies for new fishing vessels—which were banned since 2004—would increase fishing effort and contradict the EU's international commitments under Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 14.6 and World Trade Organization negotiations.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The post-2020 European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) involves the allocation of more than 6 billion euros in public funding for the 2021-2027 period to support fisheries, aquaculture, and marine environment protection.
  • The authors express concern that the former European Parliament's position re-introduced harmful subsidies, specifically those for constructing new fishing vessels that had been banned since 2004, which scientists warn will lead to increased fishing effort and overfishing.
  • Approximately 69% of European fish stocks are currently overfished, and the authors argue that maintaining economic incentives to fish beyond ecological limits prevents the achievement of sustainable fisheries.
  • The EU has international commitments via Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 14.6 to ban harmful subsidies contributing to overcapacity and overfishing by 2020, a goal the authors claim is contradicted by the former European Parliament's position and current WTO negotiations.

Cite the original document

APA
ClientEarth (n.d.). joint-ngo-letter-to-fisheries-committee-meps-highlighting-main-concerns-about-emff-coll-en-0d9676fb524fae5a.pdf. https://www.clientearth.org/media/4bxnjcay/joint-ngo-letter-to-fisheries-committee-meps-highlighting-main-concerns-about-emff-coll-en.pdf
Chicago
ClientEarth. joint-ngo-letter-to-fisheries-committee-meps-highlighting-main-concerns-about-emff-coll-en-0d9676fb524fae5a.pdf. n.d. https://www.clientearth.org/media/4bxnjcay/joint-ngo-letter-to-fisheries-committee-meps-highlighting-main-concerns-about-emff-coll-en.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite press release |author=ClientEarth |title=joint-ngo-letter-to-fisheries-committee-meps-highlighting-main-concerns-about-emff-coll-en-0d9676fb524fae5a.pdf |url=https://www.clientearth.org/media/4bxnjcay/joint-ngo-letter-to-fisheries-committee-meps-highlighting-main-concerns-about-emff-coll-en.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@misc{clientearthndjointngolettertofisheriescommitteemepshighlightingmainconcernsaboutemffcollen0d9676fb524fae5apdf, author = {{ClientEarth}}, title = {{joint-ngo-letter-to-fisheries-committee-meps-highlighting-main-concerns-about-emff-coll-en-0d9676fb524fae5a.pdf}}, publisher = {ClientEarth}, url = {https://www.clientearth.org/media/4bxnjcay/joint-ngo-letter-to-fisheries-committee-meps-highlighting-main-concerns-about-emff-coll-en.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated