The distribution of benefits derived from Forest resources

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document examines the distribution of benefits from forest resources in Ghana, highlighting a disconnect between constitutional mandates and actual practice. While the 1992 Constitution establishes a specific revenue-sharing formula for Stool and Skin lands, the Forestry Commission often retains significant portions of revenue (such as 50% of stumpage fees and contract area rent) without clear legal backing. The briefing also details various benefit-sharing mechanisms for naturally occurring and planted trees, and reviews international instruments like the African Charter and the Convention on Biological Diversity that support community rights to resource benefits.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The 1992 Constitution of Ghana mandates a specific distribution formula for revenue from Stool and Skin lands: after a 10% administrative deduction for the Office of the Administrator of Stool Lands (OASL), the remainder is split between the stool (25%), traditional authority (20%), and district assembly (55%).
  • There is a significant gap between constitutional law and practice regarding forest revenue; the Forestry Commission (FC) frequently collects fees that should be managed by the OASL and withholds 50% of collected stumpage fees and contract area rent before applying the constitutional sharing formula, a practice the document notes lacks clear legal backing.
  • Social Responsibility Agreements (SRAs) are mandatory annexes to Timber Utilization Contracts (TUCs) that require logging companies to provide amenities or services to local communities costing at least 5% of the stumpage fee value of harvested timber.

Cite the original document

APA
ClientEarth (2013). The distribution of benefits derived from Forest resources. https://www.clientearth.org/media/0rwgmkg5/2013-11-01-the-distribution-of-benefits-derived-from-forest-resources-in-ghana-ce-en.pdf
Chicago
ClientEarth. The distribution of benefits derived from Forest resources. 2013. https://www.clientearth.org/media/0rwgmkg5/2013-11-01-the-distribution-of-benefits-derived-from-forest-resources-in-ghana-ce-en.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=ClientEarth |title=The distribution of benefits derived from Forest resources |date=November 2013 |url=https://www.clientearth.org/media/0rwgmkg5/2013-11-01-the-distribution-of-benefits-derived-from-forest-resources-in-ghana-ce-en.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{clientearth2013distribution, author = {{ClientEarth}}, title = {{The distribution of benefits derived from Forest resources}}, institution = {ClientEarth}, year = {2013}, month = nov, url = {https://www.clientearth.org/media/0rwgmkg5/2013-11-01-the-distribution-of-benefits-derived-from-forest-resources-in-ghana-ce-en.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated