Estudo comparativo dos critérios agrícolas chineses e brasileiros

The document analyzes the green agricultural policies and financial markets of China and Brazil, highlighting the strategic importance of soy and beef in their bilateral trade. It identifies a divergence in focus, with China prioritizing technical production efficiency and pollution control, while Brazil focuses on land-use change, deforestation, and livestock management. The report recommends that Brazil develop a national taxonomy combining 'white list' and 'technical screening' approaches and suggests seven specific actions for China-Brazil collaboration, including the creation of a joint green agriculture fund and the harmonization of sustainable production standards for key commodities.

• Agriculture is a major source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in both nations, though the specific drivers differ: China's emissions are heavily influenced by synthetic fertilizers and rice cultivation, while Brazil's are dominated by enteric fermentation and land-use changes.
• Soy and beef are the most critical commodities for the agricultural transition between China and Brazil due to their high trade volume and significant association with GHG emissions and deforestation in the Amazon, Cerrado, and Gran Chaco regions.
• China's green agriculture strategy focuses on technical modernization, including reducing chemical inputs, improving water efficiency, and managing livestock manure to control pollution.
• Brazil's green agricultural policies prioritize land governance, the prevention of illegal deforestation, and the rehabilitation of degraded pastures through initiatives like the Forest Code and the Low Carbon Agriculture (ABC) Plan.
• China possesses one of the world's most comprehensive green finance frameworks, reaching a green credit scale of RMB 22 trillion by the end of 2022 and leading the world in green bond issuance with RMB 575.2 billion in 2022.
• Brazil is a significant green bond market in Latin America, with US$ 31 billion in green, social, sustainability, and transition bonds originated by the end of 2022, with agriculture being a primary recipient of this funding.
• The report suggests that Brazil's future green taxonomy should combine a 'white list' approach (listing eligible activities) with 'technical screening' (using scientific criteria to measure emission reductions) to ensure both ease of execution and environmental integrity.
• To enhance bilateral cooperation, the report recommends establishing a special China-Brazil green agriculture fund and issuing 'Panda bonds' to support sustainable value chains.

APA

Li, S., Alves, S., & Bai, Y. (2023). Estudo comparativo dos critérios agrícolas chineses e brasileiros. Climate Bonds Initiative. https://www.climatebonds.net/files/documents/publications/26489108-3414-4b4e-a2df-a764b9d2f2a5.pdf

Chicago

Li, Shaoxin, Sheila Alves, and Yunwen Bai. Estudo comparativo dos critérios agrícolas chineses e brasileiros. Climate Bonds Initiative, 2023. https://www.climatebonds.net/files/documents/publications/26489108-3414-4b4e-a2df-a764b9d2f2a5.pdf.

Wikipedia

{{cite report |last1=Li |first1=Shaoxin |last2=Alves |first2=Sheila |last3=Bai |first3=Yunwen |title=Estudo comparativo dos critérios agrícolas chineses e brasileiros |publisher=Climate Bonds Initiative |date=December 2023 |url=https://www.climatebonds.net/files/documents/publications/26489108-3414-4b4e-a2df-a764b9d2f2a5.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}

BibTeX

@techreport{li2023estudo, author = {Li, Shaoxin and Alves, Sheila and Bai, Yunwen}, title = {{Estudo comparativo dos critérios agrícolas chineses e brasileiros}}, institution = {Climate Bonds Initiative}, year = {2023}, month = dec, url = {https://www.climatebonds.net/files/documents/publications/26489108-3414-4b4e-a2df-a764b9d2f2a5.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }