A KANTIAN APPROACH TO TRADE AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Summary
The author critiques the utilitarian (Millsian) approach to trade and environment, arguing that environmental imperatives—such as species preservation—are categorical duties that should not be balanced against economic gains. The paper proposes 'competitive sustainability,' a system where trade rules are redesigned to reward clean growth through mechanisms like environmental countervailing duties and expanded public participation in trade disputes.
Key insights
- The author argues that a utilitarian (Millsian) approach to trade and environment is inadequate because it treats environmental protection as a variable to be balanced against economic benefit, failing to recognize that some values are 'categorical imperatives' that must be protected regardless of cost.
- Using the example of species preservation, the author asserts that the 'endangerment' standard often used to justify environmental trade restrictions is insufficient because it ignores the precautionary principle and only triggers action when a species may already be beyond saving.
- The author contends that the 'least trade restrictive' test applied to environmental standards is inappropriate due to the complexity of ecological issues, such as global warming, where the most efficient economic response is often unknown.
- The document argues that it is ethically unacceptable for developed nations to export pesticides banned domestically to developing countries based on the 'assimilative capacity' of the receiving nation.
- The author defends the use of unilateral trade sanctions as a necessary tool to force international consensus and action on environmental threats when multilateral efforts fail, citing the preservation of hawksbill sea turtles and the end of whaling.
- To implement competitive sustainability, the author suggests introducing environmental countervailing duties to eliminate 'pollution subsidies' enjoyed by companies in nations with weak environmental laws.
- The author argues for a redefinition of 'product' in GATT jurisprudence to include the entire life cycle 'from cradle to grave,' allowing countries to set standards on production and disposal processes.
Cite the original document
- APA
- HousMANn, R. F. (1992). A KANTIAN APPROACH TO TRADE AND THE ENVIRONMENT. Center for International Environmental Law. https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Kantian_Trade_1992.pdf
- Chicago
- HousMANn, RoBERT F. A KANTIAN APPROACH TO TRADE AND THE ENVIRONMENT. Center for International Environmental Law, 1992. https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Kantian_Trade_1992.pdf.
- Wikipedia
- {{cite report |last1=HousMANn |first1=RoBERT F. |title=A KANTIAN APPROACH TO TRADE AND THE ENVIRONMENT |publisher=Center for International Environmental Law |date=1992 |url=https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Kantian_Trade_1992.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
- BibTeX
- @techreport{housmann1992kantian, author = {HousMANn, RoBERT F.}, title = {{A KANTIAN APPROACH TO TRADE AND THE ENVIRONMENT}}, institution = {Center for International Environmental Law}, year = {1992}, url = {https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Kantian_Trade_1992.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }
Full text
Collected · Record updated