Browse all documents

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

This research paper, authored by David Hunter, Julia Sommer, and Scott Vaughan, provides an introduction to the basic concepts and principles of international environmental law. It aims to assist policymakers in reconciling environmental protection with trade liberalization by detailing the legal frameworks surrounding sustainable development, the duty to cooperate, the duty to avoid environmental harm, and the duty to compensate for such harm.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Sustainable development is framed through an anthropocentric lens, where the primary goal of environmental protection is to improve the human condition rather than protecting nature for its own sake. This approach posits that protecting wildlife and natural resources is a "necessity for ensuring a higher, sustained quality of life for humans."
  • The principle of 'Common but Differentiated Responsibilities' acknowledges that while sustainable development is a global challenge, industrialized nations bear a greater responsibility for environmental degradation due to their historical pressures on the environment and their available financial and technological resources.
  • International environmental law establishes a 'Duty to Cooperate' which includes several specific obligations: the general exchange of information, coordination of scientific research, prior notification of potentially damaging activities, consultation with affected states, and obtaining prior informed consent when acting within another state's territory.
  • The 'Duty to Avoid Environmental Harm' is a widely accepted principle requiring states to ensure that activities within their jurisdiction do not damage the environment of other states or areas beyond national jurisdiction. This is often linked to the Trail Smelter Arbitration, which established that "no State has the right to use or permit the use of its territory in such a manner as to cause injury by fumes in or to the territory of another."
  • The Precautionary Principle dictates that a lack of full scientific certainty should not be used as a reason to postpone cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation when there are threats of serious or irreversible damage. This principle effectively shifts the burden of proof for triggering policy responses.
  • Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) are used to analyze proposed activities to maximize sustainable development. They are increasingly required in transboundary contexts to ensure government authorities identify environmental effects and that affected citizens have the opportunity to express their views.
  • The 'Polluter Pays Principle' suggests that the entity responsible for pollution should bear the costs of prevention and remediation. This is intended to internalize environmental costs into the price of goods, encouraging a shift toward less polluting substitutes.
  • International law distinguishes between 'State responsibility' (arising from unlawful acts) and 'State liability' (which can focus on lawful acts, particularly ultra-hazardous activities). State responsibility requires that damage result from a violation of international law and be 'significant'.
  • The document identifies three distinct legal statuses for natural resources: 'Permanent Sovereignty' (resources within national boundaries), 'Shared Resources' (resources straddling borders, governed by equitable utilization), and the 'Common Heritage of Humankind' (global commons like the high seas or Antarctica, which cannot be appropriated by any one state).
  • The concept of 'Common Concern of Humankind' is emerging as a compromise to allow international regulation of resources or activities (such as biodiversity or greenhouse gas emissions) that would otherwise fall under absolute state sovereignty, based on the ecological interdependence of the planet.

Cite the original document

APA
Center for International Environmental Law (n.d.). concepts_principles_1993-92559c547e2b14c7.pdf. https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Concepts_Principles_1993.pdf
Chicago
Center for International Environmental Law. concepts_principles_1993-92559c547e2b14c7.pdf. n.d. https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Concepts_Principles_1993.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Center for International Environmental Law |title=concepts_principles_1993-92559c547e2b14c7.pdf |url=https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Concepts_Principles_1993.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{centerforinternationalenvironmentallawndconceptsprinciples199392559c547e2b14c7pdf, author = {{Center for International Environmental Law}}, title = {{concepts\_principles\_1993-92559c547e2b14c7.pdf}}, institution = {Center for International Environmental Law}, url = {https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Concepts_Principles_1993.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated