Briefing Note: Bangkok Climate Talks, September 2018

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document provides specific wording suggestions to ensure that the Paris Agreement's rights-based vision is reflected in the guidelines for Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), the Transparency Framework, the Global Stocktake, and Article 6 mechanisms. It emphasizes that these guidelines should promote the integration of human rights, gender equality, and indigenous rights without creating new obligations for Parties or new conditionalities for climate finance.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The author argues that the Implementation Guidelines should invite Parties to provide information on how human rights considerations, including indigenous peoples' rights, just transition, gender equality, food security, ecosystem integrity, and intergenerational equity, informed the preparation of their NDCs.
  • Regarding the Transparency Framework, the document proposes that reporting guidelines should invite Parties to share information on the integration of human rights, gender equality, indigenous and traditional knowledge, just transition, public participation, and food security into climate action.
  • The briefing suggests that the Global Stocktake should include inputs on social dimensions of climate action, specifically mentioning human rights, food security, gender equality, just transition, and the integration of indigenous and traditional knowledge.
  • For Article 6 mechanisms, the document asserts that these should not repeat the mistakes of the Clean Development Mechanism and must include safeguards to prevent harm and ensure projects do not undermine human rights obligations.
  • Specifically for the Sustainable Development Mechanism (Article 6.4), the author recommends the inclusion of environmental and social safeguards, meaningful public consultation with local communities and indigenous peoples, and a grievance redress mechanism.
  • The document proposes that the reporting of Internationally Transferred Mitigation Outcomes (ITMOs) under Article 6.2 should be conditional on the avoidance of human rights abuses and environmental harm.

Cite the original document

APA
Center for International Environmental Law (2018). Briefing Note: Bangkok Climate Talks, September 2018. https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CIEL_Note_Bangkok_final2.pdf
Chicago
Center for International Environmental Law. Briefing Note: Bangkok Climate Talks, September 2018. 2018. https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CIEL_Note_Bangkok_final2.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Center for International Environmental Law |title=Briefing Note: Bangkok Climate Talks, September 2018 |date=August 2018 |url=https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CIEL_Note_Bangkok_final2.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{centerforinternationalenvironmentallaw2018briefing, author = {{Center for International Environmental Law}}, title = {{Briefing Note: Bangkok Climate Talks, September 2018}}, institution = {Center for International Environmental Law}, year = {2018}, month = aug, url = {https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CIEL_Note_Bangkok_final2.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated