Monitoring States’ Compliance with their Human Rights Obligations, in the Context of Climate Change
Summary
The document outlines the mechanisms of the UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies (HRTBs) and provides a strategic guide for climate advocates to engage in the State reporting process. It highlights the benefits of securing non-binding but authoritative 'Concluding Observations' to pressure states, provides examples of successful interventions in countries like Argentina and Norway, and details the five-step reporting cycle from initial submission to national follow-up.
Key insights
- Six UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies (HRTBs) are identified as being more likely to address climate-related issues due to their treaty mandates: the Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR), the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), the Human Rights Committee (HRCom), the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD), and the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD).
- The State reporting procedure allows civil society to submit parallel reports, which can lead to 'Concluding Observations' (COBs). While COBs are not legally binding, they serve as authoritative guidance and can be used to reinforce national advocacy and litigation.
- Engagement in the State reporting procedure offers specific advantages over litigation, including relatively shorter timelines between information submission and the adoption of recommendations, and the absence of risks regarding negative precedents.
- The document cites several examples of HRTB recommendations on climate and energy: the CESCR recommended that Argentina reconsider large-scale hydraulic fracturing in the Vaca Muerta region; committees denounced fossil fuel exports by Canada, Norway, and Australia; and committees raised concerns about fossil fuel investment regulation in Switzerland and Sweden.
- In Norway, HRTBs provided critical support for climate advocates by underlining the state's extra-territorial human rights responsibility for emissions from exported oil, contradicting a Norwegian Court ruling that the state was not responsible for such emissions.
- The reporting process consists of five key stages: the State's national report submission (where civil society submits parallel reports), the publication of a 'List of Issues' (LOI), the State's reply to the LOI, a public dialogue in Geneva, and the final publication of 'Concluding Observations'.
- To maximize the impact of COBs, civil society should employ media outreach to validate policy demands and conduct national follow-up by engaging National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs), parliamentarians, and other NGOs.
- In Spain, a 2018 report to the Committee on the Rights of the Child led to recommendations that the state assess the impact of air pollution from coal-fired power plants on children's health and the climate.
Cite the original document
- APA
- Center for International Environmental Law (2020). Monitoring States’ Compliance with their Human Rights Obligations, in the Context of Climate Change. https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/BriefingNote_LeveragingHRTBs_2.pdf
- Chicago
- Center for International Environmental Law. Monitoring States’ Compliance with their Human Rights Obligations, in the Context of Climate Change. 2020. https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/BriefingNote_LeveragingHRTBs_2.pdf.
- Wikipedia
- {{cite report |author=Center for International Environmental Law |title=Monitoring States’ Compliance with their Human Rights Obligations, in the Context of Climate Change |date=January 2020 |url=https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/BriefingNote_LeveragingHRTBs_2.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
- BibTeX
- @techreport{centerforinternationalenvironmentallaw2020monitoring, author = {{Center for International Environmental Law}}, title = {{Monitoring States’ Compliance with their Human Rights Obligations, in the Context of Climate Change}}, institution = {Center for International Environmental Law}, year = {2020}, month = jan, url = {https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/BriefingNote_LeveragingHRTBs_2.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }
Full text
Collected · Record updated