Browse all documents

Civil society concerns and demands regarding the EC “nanomaterial” definition

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

An open letter from a coalition of civil society organisations to the European Commission expressing concerns over the revision process and potential outcomes of the definition of "nanomaterial".

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Civil society organisations argue that the May-June 2021 online consultation was flawed due to short notice and a lack of clarity regarding the rationale for proposed changes, which they claim favoured industry stakeholders.
  • The authors contend that proposed modifications to the nanomaterial definition could exclude substances previously covered by the 2011 recommendation, potentially undermining the "Zero Pollution ambition" and the goal of a "toxic-free environment".
  • The letter highlights systemic issues with nanomaterial oversight, including the use of unauthorised nanomaterials in consumer products and under-registration within REACH, noting that only 150 nanoforms are registered in REACH compared to double that amount in the French r-nano register.
  • The coalition demands that the European Commission justify modifications with real-world examples, assess full impacts, and hold transparent public Q&A sessions with independent experts to ensure a scientifically reliable definition.
  • The authors suggest that the revised definition should consider scientific evidence such as EFSA guidance from June 2021, which focuses on materials where more than 10% of particles have at least one external dimension smaller than 500 nm.

Cite the original document

APA
Center for International Environmental Law (2022). Civil society concerns and demands regarding the EC “nanomaterial” definition. https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/2022_02_08_CIEL_Open-letter_definition-nanomaterial.pdf
Chicago
Center for International Environmental Law. Civil society concerns and demands regarding the EC “nanomaterial” definition. 2022. https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/2022_02_08_CIEL_Open-letter_definition-nanomaterial.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite press release |author=Center for International Environmental Law |title=Civil society concerns and demands regarding the EC “nanomaterial” definition |date=8 February 2022 |url=https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/2022_02_08_CIEL_Open-letter_definition-nanomaterial.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@misc{centerforinternationalenvironmentallaw2022civil, author = {{Center for International Environmental Law}}, title = {{Civil society concerns and demands regarding the EC “nanomaterial” definition}}, publisher = {Center for International Environmental Law}, year = {2022}, month = feb, url = {https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/2022_02_08_CIEL_Open-letter_definition-nanomaterial.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated