Weniger ist mehr: Ressourceneffizienz im europäischen Drogeriehandel

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The report finds that European drugstore retailers generally fail to implement strategic planning for resource efficiency, with most lacking overarching goals to reduce the resource footprint of their product ranges. While some companies implement isolated measures, such as using recycled paper or reducing plastic bags, there is a systemic lack of transparent, annual reporting on results. The document highlights that a 20% reduction in resource consumption for daily goods is already possible through the adoption of existing alternatives like concentrated detergents and compressed deodorants.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • A study by the Wuppertal Institute indicates that resource consumption for the entire range of fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG), including cosmetics and food sold in supermarkets and drugstores, can be reduced by 20% by switching to more efficient alternatives.
  • None of the ten analyzed European drugstore retailers reported overarching goals to track or reduce the total resource consumption of their product assortments.
  • The report identifies a significant lack of time-bound targets for sustainable packaging in private labels; no company set a deadline to switch to 100% recycled or certified paper for primary and secondary packaging or for hygiene products.
  • While eight of the ten retailers reported measures to reduce plastic bag waste, none of them specified the actual savings or environmental relief effects achieved.
  • In a resource efficiency ranking, Kruidvat was found to be the leader, followed by Etos and Boots, while Douglas received zero points for its resource efficiency efforts.
  • The report notes that the FMCG sector is highly resource-intensive; in German households, these goods account for 37% of resource consumption despite only representing 17% of income expenditure.

Cite the original document

APA
Changing Markets Foundation (2016). Weniger ist mehr: Ressourceneffizienz im europäischen Drogeriehandel. https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Changing-Markets_Cutting-the-Crap_Drogerien_German_web.pdf
Chicago
Changing Markets Foundation. Weniger ist mehr: Ressourceneffizienz im europäischen Drogeriehandel. 2016. https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Changing-Markets_Cutting-the-Crap_Drogerien_German_web.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Changing Markets Foundation |title=Weniger ist mehr: Ressourceneffizienz im europäischen Drogeriehandel |date=August 2016 |url=https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Changing-Markets_Cutting-the-Crap_Drogerien_German_web.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{changingmarketsfoundation2016weniger, author = {{Changing Markets Foundation}}, title = {{Weniger ist mehr: Ressourceneffizienz im europäischen Drogeriehandel}}, institution = {Changing Markets Foundation}, year = {2016}, month = aug, url = {https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Changing-Markets_Cutting-the-Crap_Drogerien_German_web.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated