PAIA Civil Society Network – Shadow Report 2013

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The report finds a decline in the effective implementation of PAIA in South Africa, with a record low of 16% of requests released in full and a significant rise in 'deemed refusals' where information holders fail to respond. It highlights systemic failures in records management and a lack of resources and training within public bodies, while also noting high non-compliance regarding the publication of mandatory PAIA manuals.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The rate of full release of requested records has declined steadily from 35% in 2009 to 22% in 2011, reaching an all-time low of 16% for the 2012/2013 reporting period.
  • Refusals of information requests are increasing, with 66% of initial requests refused. Notably, 54% of all requests (excluding pending ones) were 'deemed refusals', meaning the information holder failed to respond entirely.
  • Compliance with statutory timeframes is very low, with only 22% of requests and 7% of internal appeals receiving a response within the required time.
  • The most frequent reason for refusing access to records was that the records did not exist or could not be found, cited in 44% of responses, which the report suggests indicates poor records management in government.
  • Public bodies show high levels of non-compliance with Section 14 of PAIA regarding the publication of PAIA manuals; by the end of the reporting period, only 60% of 45 checked national government departments had a manual on their website, and only 18% provided them in the required three languages.
  • Requests to private bodies face significant hurdles, with a 75% refusal rate and a lack of appeal mechanisms outside of court action, which the report argues allows some private bodies to avoid legal obligations by ignoring requests.
  • The report identifies a critical lack of funding for PAIA compliance, citing a South African Human Rights Commission audit (2008-2012) showing that fewer than 15% of audited institutions had specifically budgeted for PAIA implementation.

Cite the original document

APA
Kennedy, C. (2013). PAIA Civil Society Network – Shadow Report 2013. Centre for Environmental Rights. https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/PCSN_ShadowRep2013_final_20131029.pdf?x21779
Chicago
Kennedy, Catherine. PAIA Civil Society Network – Shadow Report 2013. Centre for Environmental Rights, 2013. https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/PCSN_ShadowRep2013_final_20131029.pdf?x21779.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Kennedy |first1=Catherine |title=PAIA Civil Society Network – Shadow Report 2013 |publisher=Centre for Environmental Rights |date=29 October 2013 |url=https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/PCSN_ShadowRep2013_final_20131029.pdf?x21779 |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{kennedy2013paia, author = {Kennedy, Catherine}, title = {{PAIA Civil Society Network – Shadow Report 2013}}, institution = {Centre for Environmental Rights}, year = {2013}, month = oct, url = {https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/PCSN_ShadowRep2013_final_20131029.pdf?x21779}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated