Browse all documents

NEW HERIOT GOLD MINING COMPANY LIMITED v UNION GOVERNMENT (MINISTER OF RAILWAYS AND HARBOURS) 1916 AD 415

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

This case study examines the 1916 legal precedent New Heriot Gold Mining Company Limited v Union Government, which addressed the liability of a state railway for flooding a mine due to negligent infrastructure management.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The court affirmed that while statutory authority may exempt a party from liability for water discharge caused by artificial works, this exemption does not apply if the works were "negligently executed or maintained". Negligence is defined as the "failure to take reasonable practicable measures to avoid the damage".
  • The case established a pragmatic approach to legal causation and liability when precise measurements are unavailable. The court ruled that a plaintiff should not be "disentitled to relief" simply because a "mathematical apportionment" of the damage caused by the defendant's negligence is impossible, suggesting instead that a just amount be determined based on general considerations.
  • The dispute arose after a heavy downpour on 13th November 1913 on the Witwatersrand caused floodwater to enter the New Heriot Gold Mining Company's underground works, resulting in damages fixed at £15 545. The flooding was attributed to a railway embankment that collected and diverted storm-water from its natural course.
  • The Union Government (Minister of Railways and Harbours) was held liable for the portion of the water flow resulting from its negligence in the construction and maintenance of the railway embankment.

Cite the original document

APA
Centre for Environmental Rights (n.d.). NEW HERIOT GOLD MINING COMPANY LIMITED v UNION GOVERNMENT (MINISTER OF RAILWAYS AND HARBOURS) 1916 AD 415. https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/New-Heriot-Gold-Mining-Company-Ltd-v-Union-Government.pdf?x21779
Chicago
Centre for Environmental Rights. NEW HERIOT GOLD MINING COMPANY LIMITED v UNION GOVERNMENT (MINISTER OF RAILWAYS AND HARBOURS) 1916 AD 415. n.d. https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/New-Heriot-Gold-Mining-Company-Ltd-v-Union-Government.pdf?x21779.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Centre for Environmental Rights |title=NEW HERIOT GOLD MINING COMPANY LIMITED v UNION GOVERNMENT (MINISTER OF RAILWAYS AND HARBOURS) 1916 AD 415 |url=https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/New-Heriot-Gold-Mining-Company-Ltd-v-Union-Government.pdf?x21779 |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{centreforenvironmentalrightsndnew, author = {{Centre for Environmental Rights}}, title = {{NEW HERIOT GOLD MINING COMPANY LIMITED v UNION GOVERNMENT (MINISTER OF RAILWAYS AND HARBOURS) 1916 AD 415}}, institution = {Centre for Environmental Rights}, url = {https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/New-Heriot-Gold-Mining-Company-Ltd-v-Union-Government.pdf?x21779}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated