Browse all documents

RELEVANT INFORMATION CONCERNING THE COAL IPPS – A STUDY BY THE ENERGY RESEARCH CENTRE

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

A letter from the Life After Coal Campaign to the Portfolio Committee on Environmental Affairs presenting findings from a University of Cape Town Energy Research Centre (ERC) report. The letter argues that the proposed Thabametsi and Khanyisa coal-fired power stations are unnecessary, financially risky, and would undermine South Africa's climate commitments.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The University of Cape Town’s Energy Research Centre (ERC) report indicates that the Thabametsi (557MW) and Khanyisa (300MW) coal-fired power stations would increase costs for South Africa by R19.68 billion compared to a least-cost energy system.
  • The coal IPPs are deemed unnecessary for meeting medium-term electricity demand because alternative sources, such as solar pv, wind, and flexible gas generation, are more economical.
  • The two coal IPPs are projected to increase greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 205,7Mt CO2eq over the 30-year period of the power purchase agreements, which would negate the government's GHG emission mitigation plans and the Energy Efficiency Strategy to 2050.
  • The inclusion of these coal plants could put Eskom at risk by reducing the output of its existing fleet and potentially accelerating a "utility death spiral," especially given South Africa's current surplus in inflexible base supply capacity.
  • The Life After Coal Campaign asserts that the proposed plants have an emission intensity nearly 60% higher than Eskom's Kusile and Medupi stations and that their price of R1.03 per kilowatt hour is significantly more expensive than recent renewable IPPs.

Cite the original document

APA
Centre for Environmental Rights (2018). RELEVANT INFORMATION CONCERNING THE COAL IPPS – A STUDY BY THE ENERGY RESEARCH CENTRE. https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/LAC-letter-to-PCEA-re-ERC-report_7-June-2018.pdf?x21779
Chicago
Centre for Environmental Rights. RELEVANT INFORMATION CONCERNING THE COAL IPPS – A STUDY BY THE ENERGY RESEARCH CENTRE. 2018. https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/LAC-letter-to-PCEA-re-ERC-report_7-June-2018.pdf?x21779.
Wikipedia
{{cite press release |author=Centre for Environmental Rights |title=RELEVANT INFORMATION CONCERNING THE COAL IPPS – A STUDY BY THE ENERGY RESEARCH CENTRE |date=7 June 2018 |url=https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/LAC-letter-to-PCEA-re-ERC-report_7-June-2018.pdf?x21779 |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@misc{centreforenvironmentalrights2018relevant, author = {{Centre for Environmental Rights}}, title = {{RELEVANT INFORMATION CONCERNING THE COAL IPPS – A STUDY BY THE ENERGY RESEARCH CENTRE}}, publisher = {Centre for Environmental Rights}, year = {2018}, month = jun, url = {https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/LAC-letter-to-PCEA-re-ERC-report_7-June-2018.pdf?x21779}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated