LIFE AFTER COAL CAMPAIGN - ESKOMS NON-COMPLIANCE WITH OBLIGATIONS TO PROTECT HUMAN HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT REMAINS A MATERIAL LIABILITY

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The Life After Coal Campaign argues that Eskom's reliance on coal-fired power is economically unsustainable and causes severe health and environmental damage. The campaign advocates for the accelerated decommissioning of ageing stations and a just transition to renewable energy, citing studies that suggest this would reduce costs and save lives.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Eskom's current business model of large coal-fired baseload stations is described as economically unsustainable and socially and environmentally catastrophic, contributing to a financial "death spiral".
  • A study by Meridian Economics suggests that Eskom could save up to R17 billion by accelerating the decommissioning of the Hendrina, Grootvlei, and Komati stations and curtailing the completion of Kusile units 5 and 6, without affecting the security of supply.
  • The economic cost of air pollution from coal-fired generation in South Africa is estimated at approximately R33 billion per year, resulting in 2,239 equivalent attributable deaths.
  • Eskom's coal-fired power stations are highly water-intensive, with a net annual water consumption of 314.685 million cubic metres, posing a risk in a water-scarce country.
  • Eskom's intention to extend the lifespan of its ageing stations to 60 years conflicts with South Africa's Paris Agreement obligations and Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC), as the national plateau and decline trajectory model is based on a 50-year lifespan.
  • The campaign highlights Eskom's non-compliance with Minimum Emission Standards (MES) and the lack of existing decommissioning plans or cost assessments.

Cite the original document

APA
Centre for Environmental Rights (2018). LIFE AFTER COAL CAMPAIGN - ESKOMS NON-COMPLIANCE WITH OBLIGATIONS TO PROTECT HUMAN HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT REMAINS A MATERIAL LIABILITY. https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/LAC-Letter-to-Eskom-1-Feb-2018_final.pdf?x21779
Chicago
Centre for Environmental Rights. LIFE AFTER COAL CAMPAIGN - ESKOMS NON-COMPLIANCE WITH OBLIGATIONS TO PROTECT HUMAN HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT REMAINS A MATERIAL LIABILITY. 2018. https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/LAC-Letter-to-Eskom-1-Feb-2018_final.pdf?x21779.
Wikipedia
{{cite press release |author=Centre for Environmental Rights |title=LIFE AFTER COAL CAMPAIGN - ESKOMS NON-COMPLIANCE WITH OBLIGATIONS TO PROTECT HUMAN HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT REMAINS A MATERIAL LIABILITY |date=1 February 2018 |url=https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/LAC-Letter-to-Eskom-1-Feb-2018_final.pdf?x21779 |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@misc{centreforenvironmentalrights2018life, author = {{Centre for Environmental Rights}}, title = {{LIFE AFTER COAL CAMPAIGN - ESKOMS NON-COMPLIANCE WITH OBLIGATIONS TO PROTECT HUMAN HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT REMAINS A MATERIAL LIABILITY}}, publisher = {Centre for Environmental Rights}, year = {2018}, month = feb, url = {https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/LAC-Letter-to-Eskom-1-Feb-2018_final.pdf?x21779}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated