Browse all documents

FIRSTRAND BANK’S ROLE IN FINANCING THE PROPOSED THABAMETSI COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The Centre for Environmental Rights (CER), writing on behalf of the Life After Coal Campaign, urges FirstRand Bank to withdraw financial support for the proposed Thabametsi coal-fired power plant. The letter argues that the project is economically unnecessary, environmentally damaging, and legally precarious, contradicting the bank's own commitments to a lower-carbon economy.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The 2018 draft Integrated Resource Plan for Electricity (IRP) includes 1000MW of coal-to-power for 2023–2024 from preferred bidders Thabametsi and Khanyisa, despite acknowledging that the 'least-cost' option contains only gas, wind, and solar.
  • The CER disputes the claim that Thabametsi and Khanyisa are 'procured', noting that neither has reached commercial or financial close due to outstanding or challenged legal authorisations. Thabametsi specifically lacks a NERSA generation licence, a water use licence (WUL), and an atmospheric emission licence (AEL).
  • The proposed Thabametsi plant is located in the Waterberg-Bojanala Priority Area, a polluted air quality priority area where current ambient air quality standards are already exceeded, leading to severe health issues such as respiratory infections, asthma, and cognitive decline in children.
  • Thabametsi and Khanyisa are projected to have greenhouse gas (GHG) emission intensities nearly 60% higher than Eskom’s Medupi and Kusile power stations, which the CER claims will lead to irreversible climate impacts and hinder South Africa's Paris Agreement commitments.
  • The CER asserts that financing Thabametsi contradicts FirstRand Bank's stated commitment to help clients build climate resilient infrastructure and contribute to a lower-carbon society.

Cite the original document

APA
Centre for Environmental Rights (2018). FIRSTRAND BANK’S ROLE IN FINANCING THE PROPOSED THABAMETSI COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT. https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/CER-letter-to-FirstRand-Bank_Coal-IPPs-and-draft-IRP_12-September-2018.pdf?x21779
Chicago
Centre for Environmental Rights. FIRSTRAND BANK’S ROLE IN FINANCING THE PROPOSED THABAMETSI COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT. 2018. https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/CER-letter-to-FirstRand-Bank_Coal-IPPs-and-draft-IRP_12-September-2018.pdf?x21779.
Wikipedia
{{cite press release |author=Centre for Environmental Rights |title=FIRSTRAND BANK’S ROLE IN FINANCING THE PROPOSED THABAMETSI COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT |date=12 September 2018 |url=https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/CER-letter-to-FirstRand-Bank_Coal-IPPs-and-draft-IRP_12-September-2018.pdf?x21779 |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@misc{centreforenvironmentalrights2018firstrand, author = {{Centre for Environmental Rights}}, title = {{FIRSTRAND BANK’S ROLE IN FINANCING THE PROPOSED THABAMETSI COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT}}, publisher = {Centre for Environmental Rights}, year = {2018}, month = sep, url = {https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/CER-letter-to-FirstRand-Bank_Coal-IPPs-and-draft-IRP_12-September-2018.pdf?x21779}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated