Risk Allocation and Regulation for CO2 Infrastructure

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The UK has adopted a heavily regulated asset base (RAB) model for its CO2 transport and storage (T&S) infrastructure to mitigate 'cross-chain risks' and attract investment. Under the Transport and Storage Regulatory Investment (TRI) model, private Transport and Storage Companies (T&SCo) operate networks under licenses from Ofgem, with revenues derived from user tariffs and supported by a Revenue Support Agreement (RSA) and a Government Support Package (GSP) for high-impact risks. This contrasts with the Netherlands and Denmark, where infrastructure is more commercially driven or involves direct state equity stakes in storage. The UK intends to transition toward a more competitive market for storage after 2035, while onshore transport is expected to remain regulated.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The UK's Transport and Storage Regulatory Investment (TRI) model utilizes a regulated asset base (RAB) approach to manage the high capital costs and 'cross-chain risks' of CO2 infrastructure, where risks are shared between the state and private developers.
  • The Economic Regulatory Regime (ERR), administered by Ofgem, determines the 'allowed revenue' for a Transport and Storage Company (T&SCo) based on its Regulated Asset Value (RAV), operational costs, and a weighted average cost of capital (WACC).
  • User tariffs for the CO2 network consist of a capacity charge for fixed capital, a volumetric charge for variable operational costs, and a residual charge to cover any remaining revenue shortfall, with tariffs standardized regardless of the user's location.
  • Financial safety nets include the Revenue Support Agreement (RSA), which covers temporary shortfalls between allowed and actual revenue, and the Government Support Package (GSP), which acts as a backstop for 'showstopper' events like stranded assets or significant CO2 leakage.

Cite the original document

APA
Lockwood, T. (2024). Risk Allocation and Regulation for CO2 Infrastructure. Clean Air Task Force. https://www.catf.us/resource/risk-allocation-regulation-co2-infrastructure/
Chicago
Lockwood, Toby. Risk Allocation and Regulation for CO2 Infrastructure. Clean Air Task Force, 2024. https://www.catf.us/resource/risk-allocation-regulation-co2-infrastructure/.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Lockwood |first1=Toby |title=Risk Allocation and Regulation for CO2 Infrastructure |publisher=Clean Air Task Force |date=14 March 2024 |url=https://www.catf.us/resource/risk-allocation-regulation-co2-infrastructure/ |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{lockwood2024risk, author = {Lockwood, Toby}, title = {{Risk Allocation and Regulation for CO2 Infrastructure}}, institution = {Clean Air Task Force}, year = {2024}, month = mar, url = {https://www.catf.us/resource/risk-allocation-regulation-co2-infrastructure/}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated