Notice of Intent Regarding Conditional Registrations under the Pest Control Products Regulations, January 19, 2016

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment (CAPE) supports the decision to discontinue new conditional registrations for pesticides effective June 1, 2016, but argues that the Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) must also end existing conditional registrations by a set date. CAPE highlights that 80 pesticide products currently hold conditional registrations, including neonicotinoids linked to pollinator decline and ecosystem damage. Additionally, the document cites a Federal Commissioner's report identifying PMRA failings in assessing cumulative health effects, re-evaluating pre-1995 pesticides, cancelling high-risk products, and maintaining transparency with the public.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • CAPE supports the Federal Government's decision to stop granting new conditional registrations for pesticides starting June 1, 2016, but argues the policy is insufficient because it does not address pesticides that already have conditional approvals.
  • There are currently 80 pesticide products on the market under conditional registrations, with 29 held for over five years and nine for over ten years; eight of the longest-held registrations are for neonicotinoid pesticides.
  • Neonicotinoid pesticides are linked to increased bee mortality and broader ecosystem harm, which may threaten global food security; a loss of all insect pollinators could decrease global fruit supplies by 23%, vegetables by 16%, and nuts and seeds by 22%, potentially increasing annual global deaths from nutrition-related diseases by 1.42 million.
  • The Federal Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development identified several failures in the PMRA's registration process, including inconsistent assessment of cumulative health effects, slow re-evaluation of pesticides registered before 1995, delays in cancelling high-risk products, and a lack of transparency regarding data requested from proponents.

Cite the original document

APA
Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment (2016). Notice of Intent Regarding Conditional Registrations under the Pest Control Products Regulations, January 19, 2016. https://cape.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/2.Let-PMRA-Conditional-Registrations-Mar-2016.pdf
Chicago
Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment. Notice of Intent Regarding Conditional Registrations under the Pest Control Products Regulations, January 19, 2016. 2016. https://cape.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/2.Let-PMRA-Conditional-Registrations-Mar-2016.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite press release |author=Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment |title=Notice of Intent Regarding Conditional Registrations under the Pest Control Products Regulations, January 19, 2016 |date=18 March 2016 |url=https://cape.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/2.Let-PMRA-Conditional-Registrations-Mar-2016.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@misc{canadianassociationofphysiciansfortheenvironment2016notice, author = {{Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment}}, title = {{Notice of Intent Regarding Conditional Registrations under the Pest Control Products Regulations, January 19, 2016}}, publisher = {Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment}, year = {2016}, month = mar, url = {https://cape.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/2.Let-PMRA-Conditional-Registrations-Mar-2016.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated