{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"organization":["Yale Program on Climate Change Communication"]},"warnings":[]},"total":{"value":294,"relation":"eq"},"page":6,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?organization=yale-program-on-climate-change-communication&page=6","next":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?organization=yale-program-on-climate-change-communication&page=7","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"commyale-000102","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/commyale-000102","title":"Climate migration needs personal stories","publisher":{"name":"Yale Program on Climate Change Communication","organization":"yale-program-on-climate-change-communication"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2021-01-05","source_url":"https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/news-events/climate-migration-needs-personal-stories/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The text examines the link between climate change and mass migration from Central America's Northern Triangle to the U.S., highlighting how droughts and crop failures drive food insecurity and displacement. It asserts that personal narratives are more effective than data alone in shifting public perception and overcoming climate skepticism. The author calls for the U.S. government to integrate climate change into national security and immigration policies and urges communicators to use human-centric storytelling to justify international climate funding and compassionate treatment of migrants.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000102#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Climate change in Central America is characterized by increased heat, dryness, and intensified floods and tropical storms, which have led to severe food insecurity. In Honduras, a 2018 drought likely destroyed more than 80% of bean and maize crops.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000102#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There was a massive increase in families from Guatemala, El Salvador, and Honduras seeking asylum in the U.S., rising from fewer than 2,000 in 2012 to nearly 375,000 in 2019. In 2019, families and unaccompanied children from these three nations constituted 80% of migrants reaching the U.S.-Mexico border.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000102#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Personal stories are a powerful communication tool that can trigger worry and compassion, potentially persuading climate skeptics that climate change is currently impacting people and ecosystems.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000102#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Trump Administration's approach to migration included removing climate change from national security priorities, cutting climate adaptation and agricultural training funds for Central America, and implementing 'zero-tolerance' policies that separated parents and children.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000102#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Biden administration has signaled a shift by appointing a U.S. Climate Envoy and pledging $3 billion to the Green Climate Fund, a mechanism designed to mitigate climate impacts that displace people in developing nations.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000102#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate migration","food security","climate change adaptation","climate finance","Green Climate Fund","national security","climate change communication","drought","tropical cyclone"],"geography_discussed":["Honduras","Guatemala","El Salvador","Mexico"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy analysis","communication strategy"]},{"id":"commyale-000181","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/commyale-000181","title":"Climate Activism: A Six Americas Analysis","publisher":{"name":"Yale Program on Climate Change Communication","organization":"yale-program-on-climate-change-communication"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2020-12","source_url":"https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/app/uploads/2021/03/climate-activism-six-americas-december-2020.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report analyzes climate activism in the U.S. using the 'Six Americas' framework, finding that while many Americans—particularly those in the 'Alarmed' segment—express a willingness to participate in climate campaigns and political actions, actual participation rates remain low. Consumer activism, such as rewarding or punishing companies based on their climate records, is more common than direct political advocacy. The study also notes a trend toward increased alarm regarding global warming over a five-year period and highlights that perceived collective efficacy is higher for local than for national decision-makers.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000181#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The American public's attitude toward global warming has shifted toward the 'Alarmed' segment over five years; in October 2015, the Alarmed (17%) outnumbered the Dismissive (10%) by seven percentage points, but by December 2020, they outnumbered them by more than 3 to 1 (26% vs. 8%).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000181#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Americans generally feel more confident in their collective ability to influence local entities than national ones. 51% are at least \"moderately confident\" that people like them can affect local businesses, compared to 43% for the federal government and 43% for corporations.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000181#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is a significant gap between the willingness to participate in climate campaigns and actual participation. While 29% of Americans say they would definitely or probably participate in a campaign to convince elected officials to take action, only 1% report currently doing so.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000181#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A minority of Americans are open to non-violent civil disobedience; 25% would support an organization engaging in such activities against corporate or government actions that worsen global warming, and 15% would personally engage in it.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000181#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Direct political engagement in the past 12 months has been low, with only 9% of Americans contacting an elected official to urge action on global warming, though this rises to 24% among the Alarmed segment.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000181#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Consumer-based activism is more prevalent than political activism. 36% of Americans have rewarded companies taking steps to reduce global warming by buying their products, and 30% have punished companies opposing such steps by not buying them.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000181#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["survey analysis","behavioral analysis"]},{"id":"commyale-000195","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/commyale-000195","title":"Climate Change in the American Mind","publisher":{"name":"Yale Program on Climate Change Communication","organization":"yale-program-on-climate-change-communication"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2020-12","source_url":"https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/app/uploads/2021/02/climate-change-american-mind-december-2020.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The December 2020 survey reveals that 72% of Americans believe global warming is happening, with 58% attributing it to human activity. While 66% express worry and 65% feel a personal responsibility to help, social engagement remains low, as 62% rarely or never discuss the issue with family and friends. The report also highlights a gap in scientific literacy, with only 20% aware that over 90% of climate scientists agree on human-caused warming. Americans primarily view global warming as an environmental (80%) and scientific (73%) issue, and a majority believe it is already harming people in the U.S. and affecting national weather.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000195#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"A significant majority of Americans believe global warming is occurring, with 72% stating it is happening compared to 13% who believe it is not. Half of the population (50%) are 'extremely' or 'very' sure of its occurrence.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000195#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"While 58% of Americans recognize that global warming is mostly human-caused, there is a notable lack of understanding regarding the strength of the scientific consensus; only 20% know that more than 90% of climate scientists agree on this point.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000195#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Emotional responses are varied, with 66% of Americans reporting they are at least 'somewhat worried' about global warming. Other common emotions include feeling 'hopeful' (43%), 'disgusted' (42%), or 'helpless' (41%).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000195#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Perceptions of harm are increasing, with 47% of Americans believing people in the U.S. are being harmed by global warming 'right now.' Additionally, 42% report having personally experienced its effects.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000195#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Social engagement with the topic is low; 62% of Americans rarely or never discuss global warming with friends and family, and only 21% hear people they know talk about it at least once a month.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000195#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Most Americans feel a personal connection to the issue, with 66% stating it is personally important and 65% feeling a personal responsibility to help reduce global warming.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000195#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Americans conceptualize global warming primarily as an environmental (80%) and scientific (73%) issue, though majorities also view it as agricultural (68%), severe weather (66%), economic (66%), and health (62%) related.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000195#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is a strong link between global warming and weather perceptions in the U.S., with 63% believing it is affecting U.S. weather and 35% stating it is affecting it 'a lot.'","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000195#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A majority of Americans associate specific extreme weather events with global warming, including 55% for 2020 Gulf Coast hurricanes and tropical storms, and 54% for western U.S. wildfires.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000195#insight-9","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Local environmental hazards cause significant concern, with the highest levels of worry directed at water pollution (73%) and air pollution (73%).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000195#insight-10","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change","extreme weather event","wildfire","climate change communication"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["public opinion survey"]},{"id":"commyale-000268","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/commyale-000268","title":"Engaging Global Warming's Six Americas","publisher":{"name":"Yale Program on Climate Change Communication","organization":"yale-program-on-climate-change-communication"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2020-12","source_url":"https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/app/uploads/2014/03/Messaging-for-Six-Americas-2021.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document identifies six distinct audience segments in the U.S. population—Alarmed, Concerned, Cautious, Disengaged, Doubtful, and Dismissive—based on their level of concern and engagement with climate change. It argues that effective communication requires tailoring messages to these groups' specific psychological and cultural profiles. For highly involved groups (Alarmed, Concerned), the paper suggests focusing on efficacy and opinion leadership. For low-involvement groups (Cautious, Disengaged), it recommends non-effortful strategies like narratives and social norms. For skeptical groups (Doubtful, Dismissive), it advises non-confrontational framing aligned with conservative values, such as patriotism and free-market solutions, to avoid the 'boomerang effect' of motivated reasoning.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000268#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The U.S. population is divided into six audience segments based on a spectrum of concern and engagement: the Alarmed (most concerned/motivated), Concerned, Cautious, Disengaged, Doubtful, and Dismissive (least concerned/motivated).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000268#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Alarmed segment is characterized by high issue involvement, strong belief in human-caused climate change, and a tendency toward egalitarian values; they are most likely to be liberal Democrats and are highly attentive to environmental news.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000268#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Dismissive segment represents the opposite of the Alarmed, characterized by high issue involvement but a strong rejection of climate science, high individualism, and a lack of trust in scientists.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000268#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Low-involvement segments, specifically the Cautious and Disengaged, are less likely to exert cognitive effort to process complex information and are best reached through non-effortful strategies such as visual imagery, humor, narratives, and the promotion of positive social norms.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000268#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"For the Alarmed and Concerned, communication should focus on building efficacy—the belief that action is effective and possible—to translate high risk perceptions into actual behavior, and leveraging them as opinion leaders within their social networks.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000268#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Skeptical audiences (Doubtful and Dismissive) often engage in motivated reasoning and counter-arguing when challenged; therefore, effective engagement requires non-confrontational framing that aligns with conservative values, such as patriotism, respect for authority, and free-market solutions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000268#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change communication","environmental policy"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["audience analysis","communication strategy"]},{"id":"commyale-000278","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/commyale-000278","title":"Politics & Global Warming","publisher":{"name":"Yale Program on Climate Change Communication","organization":"yale-program-on-climate-change-communication"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2020-12","source_url":"https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/app/uploads/2021/01/politics-global-warming-december-2020b.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"A December 2020 survey of 949 registered U.S. voters reveals broad support for clean energy development and various climate policies, though significant partisan divides remain regarding the urgency of global warming and specific regulatory measures. While majorities support transitioning to 100% clean energy by 2050 and participating in the Paris Climate Agreement, support for fossil fuel expansion remains higher among Republicans. The report also highlights a general consensus on the importance of infrastructure investment and climate education in schools.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000278#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"A majority of registered voters view clean energy and global warming as government priorities, with 66% stating that developing clean energy sources should be a \"high or very high priority for the president and Congress\" and 53% saying the same for global warming.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000278#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is strong bipartisan support for several clean energy and efficiency policies, including tax rebates for energy-efficient vehicles or solar panels (82%), funding for renewable energy research (82%), and stronger energy efficiency standards for new buildings (86%).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000278#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Registered voters show significant support for transitioning the U.S. economy to 100% clean energy by 2050 (72%) and for the U.S. to participate in the Paris Climate Agreement (75%).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000278#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Public opinion on fossil fuel production is divided; while 40% support drilling and mining fossil fuels on public land and 47% support offshore drilling, only 28% support drilling in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000278#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A majority of registered voters (66%) support the Green New Deal, although only 18% of respondents report having heard \"a lot\" about the proposal.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000278#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Regarding the economic impact of the energy transition, 56% of voters believe clean energy policies will improve economic growth and create jobs, and 61% believe clean energy production will create more new jobs than fossil fuel production.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000278#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is broad support for government investment in infrastructure (68%), with the highest priorities being roads, bridges, and highways (93%) and public water supply systems (90%).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000278#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A majority of registered voters (64%) believe the U.S. should reduce greenhouse gas emissions regardless of the actions of other countries, and 70% believe corporations and industry should do more to address global warming.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000278#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is strong support (78%) for schools teaching children about the causes, consequences, and potential solutions to global warming.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000278#insight-9","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Global warming was an important factor in the 2020 election for 48% of registered voters, though this was heavily split by party, with 74% of Democrats and only 24% of Republicans citing it as important.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000278#insight-10","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["clean energy","renewable energy","carbon dioxide emissions","carbon tax","energy efficiency","electric vehicle","fossil fuel","Paris Agreement","Green New Deal","greenhouse gas emissions","climate education","infrastructure investment","climate finance"],"geography_discussed":["People's Republic of China","Alaska"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["public opinion survey"]},{"id":"commyale-000078","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/commyale-000078","title":"Shifting Views of an Ideal Society in the U.S.","publisher":{"name":"Yale Program on Climate Change Communication","organization":"yale-program-on-climate-change-communication"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2020-11-11","source_url":"https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/shifting-views-of-an-ideal-society-in-the-u-s/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report finds a growing divide in cultural worldviews between U.S. Democrats and Republicans. Since 2008, Democrats, particularly liberal Democrats, have become more egalitarian and less individualistic, increasing their support for government-guaranteed basic needs and wealth redistribution. In contrast, Republicans have remained highly individualistic, favoring individual liberty and opposing government intervention. This divergence suggests that building a bipartisan consensus on climate change is becoming more difficult as the two parties hold increasingly opposite views on the role of government in solving societal problems.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000078#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Since 2008, Democrats—especially liberal Democrats—have shifted toward a more egalitarian worldview and away from individualism, while Republicans' views have remained largely static.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000078#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Support for the government guaranteeing all basic human needs (food, housing, health care, and education) for everyone reached 47% of registered voters in 2020, with a significant divide between liberal Democrats (83%) and conservative Republicans (11%).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000078#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is an increasing partisan gap regarding global wealth distribution; in 2020, 46% of registered voters believed the world would be more peaceful if wealth were divided more equally among nations, a view held by majorities of Democrats but minorities of Republicans.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000078#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Registered voters are increasingly divided on the role of government in fixing problems; 50% of voters in 2020 agreed that society would be better off if the government spent less time trying to fix everyone's problems, a sentiment strongly supported by conservative Republicans (80%) but rejected by liberal Democrats (22%).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000078#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The divergence in cultural worldviews between the two major political parties may hinder the ability to reach a bipartisan consensus on climate change solutions due to opposing views on government's role.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000078#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change","environmental regulation"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["public opinion survey","longitudinal analysis"]},{"id":"commyale-000128","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/commyale-000128","title":"New study: Building support for electric vehicles","publisher":{"name":"Yale Program on Climate Change Communication","organization":"yale-program-on-climate-change-communication"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2020-10-20","source_url":"https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/new-study-building-support-for-electric-vehicles/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"An experiment with 912 American adults found that listening to real-world stories about EV success in Norway and Greensboro, North Carolina, significantly increased participants' perceptions of EV reliability, affordability, and practicality. These stories also led to stronger support for national charging networks, electric buses, and tax rebates, suggesting that narrative-based communication is an effective tool for accelerating the transition to electric vehicles.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000128#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Listening to audio stories about electric vehicles (EVs) significantly improved participants' beliefs that EVs are reliable, practical, affordable, and beneficial for the environment compared to a control group.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000128#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The EV stories increased public support for specific policies, including the creation of a national charging station network, the adoption of electric buses, and the provision of tax rebates for EV buyers.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000128#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The experiment demonstrated that communicating real-world examples—such as high EV adoption in Norway and cost savings from electric buses in Greensboro, North Carolina—makes consumers more likely to consider purchasing an EV in the future.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000128#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["electric vehicle","transportation","climate change communication","electric vehicle charging network","carbon dioxide emissions"],"geography_discussed":["Norway","Greensboro","North Carolina"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["experiment"]},{"id":"commyale-000157","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/commyale-000157","title":"Global Warming’s Six Americas in 2020","publisher":{"name":"Yale Program on Climate Change Communication","organization":"yale-program-on-climate-change-communication"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2020-10-11","source_url":"https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/global-warmings-six-americas-in-2020/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report identifies six segments of the U.S. adult population based on climate change attitudes: Alarmed, Concerned, Cautious, Disengaged, Doubtful, and Dismissive. As of 2020, 54% of Americans are either Alarmed or Concerned, while the Alarmed group has more than doubled in size over five years. Despite this growth, many in the Concerned and Cautious groups still perceive climate change as a future problem rather than a current threat.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000157#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"As of 2020, a majority of Americans (54%) are categorized as either 'Alarmed' or 'Concerned', while the 'Doubtful' and 'Dismissive' groups together make up 18% of the population. The Alarmed group (26%) now outnumbers the Dismissive group (7%) by nearly 4 to 1.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000157#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Over a five-year period, the 'Alarmed' segment more than doubled from 11% to 26% of the U.S. adult population, while the 'Dismissive' segment decreased by nearly half, falling from 12% to 7%.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000157#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is a persistent misunderstanding among the 'Concerned' and 'Cautious' groups, who represent nearly half of U.S. adults, regarding the current impacts of global warming; they tend to view it as a future issue and are often unaware of existing harms to human health, economic disasters from storms and fires, and dangerous weather.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000157#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is an increasing consensus across political party lines that transitioning to 100% clean energy is the correct path for the prosperity of the United States.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000157#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["clean energy"],"geography_discussed":["America"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["public opinion survey"]},{"id":"commyale-000010","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/commyale-000010","title":"Black Lives Matter in the Climate Movement","publisher":{"name":"Yale Program on Climate Change Communication","organization":"yale-program-on-climate-change-communication"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2020-09-02","source_url":"https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/news-events/black-lives-matter-in-the-climate-movement/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document asserts that Black Americans are disproportionately affected by climate change and environmental hazards, noting a historical lack of attention to environmental racism in the mainstream environmental movement. It highlights a significant funding disparity, where environmental justice non-profits receive only slightly more than one percent of the funding awarded to environmental non-profits by 12 national foundations. The author calls for the climate movement to dismantle structural racism by allocating more resources to organizations led by Black individuals and prioritizing diversity and inclusion within advocacy spaces.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000010#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Black Americans experience higher levels of concern regarding climate change and are more likely to suffer its impacts, such as extreme weather, compared to non-Hispanic White Americans. This is partly due to the disproportionate location of polluting industries in Black neighborhoods.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000010#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Climate change and air pollution are linked to increased pregnancy risks—including premature, underweight, or stillborn babies—which affect Black mothers at a higher rate.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000010#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The environmental justice movement is traced back to a 1982 protest against a PCB Landfill in Warren County, North Carolina, where a predominantly Black community felt targeted for hazardous waste based on demographics.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000010#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is a severe funding gap for environmental justice non-profits; of $1.34 billion awarded to environmental non-profits by 12 national foundations, only $18 million—slightly more than one percent—went to environmental justice organizations.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000010#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Environmental non-profits lack transparency regarding diversity; only 3.7% of 12,054 studied organizations released diversity data, and only 2.1% revealed racial/ethnic data, though environmental justice organizations were more likely to do so.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000010#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change","environmental justice","environmental racism","climate change mitigation","climate finance","public health"],"geography_discussed":["Warren County"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy analysis","social analysis"]},{"id":"commyale-000127","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/commyale-000127","title":"Does climate change increase risk of conflict?","publisher":{"name":"Yale Program on Climate Change Communication","organization":"yale-program-on-climate-change-communication"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2020-09-02","source_url":"https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/news-events/does-climate-change-increase-risk-of-conflict/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The research paper examines the relationship between climate change and global instability, asserting that while climate change may not cause conflict in isolation, it intensifies problems like food and water insecurity, economic loss, and ethnic tensions. It highlights that the risk of conflict is heavily dependent on regional sociopolitical contexts, such as government corruption and historical grievances. The document also notes a correlation in the U.S. between residents of disaster-prone areas and higher levels of concern regarding climate change, suggesting that these insights should inform government policies on mitigation and conflict prevention.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000127#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Climate change functions as a \"threat multiplier\" that does not necessarily cause conflict on its own but increases risk by intensifying existing societal problems, such as food and water insecurity, which can lead to income loss and motivate people to riot or rebel.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000127#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The likelihood of climate-induced conflict is contingent upon regional sociopolitical and economic factors, including the presence of corrupt or weak governments, histories of past conflict, and pre-existing ethnic discrimination or colonialist histories.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000127#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Climate change can create a feedback loop where environmental changes make societies more vulnerable to structural violence, and that violence in turn reduces a society's capacity to cope with extreme weather and resource scarcity.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000127#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Climate-driven instability can spill over into other regions through the disruption of nearby economies, the inflow of arms and mercenaries, and distress migration that exacerbates resource scarcity or identity conflicts in host regions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000127#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Data from the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication indicates that people living in U.S. counties more affected by natural disasters, specifically in coastal Florida (around Miami), Texas, and North Carolina, express higher levels of worry about climate change.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000127#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change","food insecurity","climate migration","natural disaster","climate change mitigation"],"geography_discussed":["United States","Florida","Miami","Texas","North Carolina","sub-Saharan Africa","India","Kenya","Sudan","Somalia","Syria","Lake Chad"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["literature review","policy analysis"]},{"id":"commyale-000141","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/commyale-000141","title":"How does the American public perceive climate disasters?","publisher":{"name":"Yale Program on Climate Change Communication","organization":"yale-program-on-climate-change-communication"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2020-08-24","source_url":"https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/how-does-the-american-public-perceive-climate-disasters/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"Based on 2018 and 2019 survey data, the study finds that 64% of Americans believe global warming affects U.S. weather. Risk perceptions are heavily influenced by local geography, with residents in the West fearing droughts and wildfires, those in the Midwest fearing flooding, and those in the East and Southeast fearing hurricanes. While 56% of Americans view extreme weather as a high or moderate risk to their community over the next decade, the specific concerns vary by state, often reflecting local experiences with 'Billion Dollar Disaster Events'.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000141#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Approximately 64% of Americans believe that global warming is affecting weather in the United States, with 32% stating it affects it 'a lot', 25% 'some', and 7% 'a little'.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000141#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Public risk perceptions of extreme weather are strongly tied to geographic region: residents in the Midwest are most concerned with flooding, those in the East and Southeast with hurricanes, and those in southern and western states with heat-related events such as wildfires, droughts, and water shortages.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000141#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Specific state-level data shows high concentrations of concern: 85% of California respondents are most worried about droughts, 76% of North Carolina respondents about hurricanes, and 96% of Floridians about hurricanes.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000141#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A majority of Americans (56%) perceive extreme weather as posing a 'High' or 'Moderate risk' to their community over the next 10 years, while 37% perceive it as a 'Low' (31%) or 'No' (7%) risk.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000141#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change","extreme weather event","drought","wildfire","flood","hurricane","water scarcity","extreme heat"],"geography_discussed":["California","Washington","Michigan","Illinois","North Carolina","Virginia","Florida","Midwestern United States","Southwest"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["public opinion survey"]},{"id":"commyale-000068","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/commyale-000068","title":"Exploring Gender Differences in the American Diet","publisher":{"name":"Yale Program on Climate Change Communication","organization":"yale-program-on-climate-change-communication"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2020-08-03","source_url":"https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/exploring-gender-differences-in-the-american-diet/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document examines the relationship between gender and climate-related food choices in the US, finding that women generally have higher risk perceptions and a greater willingness to adopt plant-based diets and reduce food waste than men, though they also report more uncertainty regarding specific dietary impacts on global warming.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000068#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Women in the United States generally exhibit higher levels of worry and stronger pro-climate beliefs than men, which may motivate them to make more climate-conscious consumer choices.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000068#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Women are more likely than men to believe that reducing food waste and composting can mitigate global warming, with 48% of women believing reducing waste helps and 52% believing composting helps, compared to 41% and 37% of men respectively.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000068#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Despite higher general concern, women report more uncertainty than men regarding the specific impact of certain dietary choices on global warming, such as the effect of plant-based diets and the use of clean cookstoves.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000068#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Women show a greater willingness to adopt plant-based meat alternatives (58% vs 52%), reduce red meat consumption (28% vs 20%), and use dairy alternatives (24% vs 17%) than men, driven largely by environmental and animal protection motivations.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000068#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Men are more likely than women to be open to eating cell-culture grown meat, with 29% of men expressing willingness compared to 22% of women.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000068#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["food system","food waste","greenhouse gas emissions"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["comparative analysis","behavioral analysis"]},{"id":"commyale-000009","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/commyale-000009","title":"Do Americans support voting by mail to limit the spread of coronavirus infections?","publisher":{"name":"Yale Program on Climate Change Communication","organization":"yale-program-on-climate-change-communication"},"document_type":"fact sheet","language":"en","date_published":"2020-07-10","source_url":"https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/do-americans-support-voting-by-mail-to-limit-the-spread-of-coronavirus-infections/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"A survey conducted in April 2020 found that 78% of Americans nationally support ensuring all citizens can vote by mail to limit COVID-19 infections. Support remained high across the United States, with more than three quarters of the public supporting the measure in 46 states. The lowest levels of support were found in Kentucky, Tennessee, Alabama, and Mississippi, while the highest were in states that already utilized vote-by-mail systems, such as Hawaii, Colorado, Washington, Oregon, and California.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000009#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Nationally, 78% of Americans support the option for all U.S. citizens to vote by mail in the November 2020 election to limit the spread of coronavirus infections.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000009#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Public support for voting by mail is high across most of the country, with over 75% support in 46 states. The range of support across all 50 states varied by no more than 9 percentage points.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000009#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The lowest levels of support for voting by mail were recorded in Kentucky (73%), and Tennessee, Alabama, and Mississippi (each 74%).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000009#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"States that had already implemented vote-by-mail systems prior to the pandemic showed some of the highest support levels, including Hawaii (82%), Colorado (78%), and Washington, Oregon, and California (each 80%).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000009#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":[],"geography_discussed":["Colorado","Hawaii","Oregon","Utah","Washington","Kentucky","Tennessee","Alabama","Mississippi","California"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["public opinion survey"]},{"id":"commyale-000087","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/commyale-000087","title":"Who do Americans trust most for information about COVID-19?","publisher":{"name":"Yale Program on Climate Change Communication","organization":"yale-program-on-climate-change-communication"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2020-06-04","source_url":"https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/who-do-americans-trust-most-for-information-about-covid-19/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The study finds that a vast majority of Americans across all 50 states trust their own doctors, infectious disease experts, the CDC, and family and friends for COVID-19 information. While trust in media and government varies—with local TV and local/state officials being more trusted than national networks and federal figures—there is very little geographic variation in these trust levels, with a maximum range of 4 percentage points across states.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000087#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"In every U.S. state, there is an overwhelming level of trust in medical professionals and public health authorities, with over 90% of Americans trusting their own doctors and over 87% trusting infectious disease experts and the Center for Disease Control (CDC).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000087#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Personal networks are highly trusted, with more than 80% of Americans in every state trusting their family and friends for COVID-19 information.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000087#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Trust in media and government sources is more fragmented; local TV is the most trusted media source (82%), while national networks like CNN (57%), MSNBC (52%), and FOX News (52%) have lower trust levels. Local (74%) and state (72%) government officials are more trusted than Members of Congress (55%) and President Trump, who is the only source trusted by fewer than half of Americans (48%).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000087#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Despite general political partisanship, there is minimal geographic variation in trust for COVID-19 information, with the range of variability across all 50 states not exceeding 4 percentage points for any source.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000087#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change disinformation"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["survey","geographic analysis"]},{"id":"commyale-000045","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/commyale-000045","title":"Young Adults & Climate Activism","publisher":{"name":"Yale Program on Climate Change Communication","organization":"yale-program-on-climate-change-communication"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2020-04-28","source_url":"https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/young-adults-climate-activism/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document analyzes a November 2019 survey of 1,303 U.S. adults to compare climate activism across generations. It finds that Millennials and younger adults (aged 18-38) are more likely than Generation X and Baby Boomers to support climate activists, engage in political action, and believe in collective efficacy. These trends are observed across political lines, with notable shifts among younger Republicans who are more likely than older Republicans to support climate activism and accept that climate change is human-caused.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000045#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Millennials and younger adults (aged 18-38) demonstrate higher levels of support for and identification with climate activists urging government action compared to older generations. They are also more willing to volunteer, donate, and engage in non-violent civil disobedience, such as sit-ins or blockades, against entities that exacerbate global warming.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000045#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The most significant generational gaps appear in voting and public activism. Specifically, 59% of adults aged 18-38 would vote for a candidate based on their position on global warming, whereas only 48% of Generation X and 46% of Baby Boomers or older adults would do the same.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000045#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Younger generations possess a stronger sense of collective efficacy than older generations across the political spectrum, meaning they have more confidence that citizens working together can influence business and government decision-makers.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000045#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Generational divides are particularly evident among Republicans. Younger Republicans are more likely than older Republicans to support climate activists, join campaigns to influence elected officials, share information on social media, and attend political rallies or protests.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000045#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Data from the Democracy Fund’s Views of the Electorate Survey indicates that since 2011, younger Republicans have become more accepting of the fact that climate change is human-caused, while older Republicans have shown little to no change.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000045#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["environmental justice"],"geography_discussed":["Sweden"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["public opinion survey","generational analysis"]},{"id":"commyale-000062","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/commyale-000062","title":"Race and Climate Change","publisher":{"name":"Yale Program on Climate Change Communication","organization":"yale-program-on-climate-change-communication"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2020-04-15","source_url":"https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/race-and-climate-change/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report finds that Hispanics/Latinos and African Americans in the U.S. are more likely to be 'Alarmed' or 'Concerned' about global warming and more willing to engage in climate activism than Whites. While a majority of Hispanics/Latinos view global warming as 'very important' to their 2020 vote, it ranks lower in priority for African Americans. The analysis suggests these differences are partly driven by higher exposure to environmental hazards and differences in political party identification.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000062#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Hispanics/Latinos and African Americans exhibit higher levels of concern regarding global warming compared to Whites. Specifically, 69% of Hispanics/Latinos and 57% of African Americans are categorized as 'Alarmed' or 'Concerned', whereas only 49% of Whites fall into these categories. Conversely, Whites are more likely to be 'Doubtful' or 'Dismissive' (27%) than African Americans (12%) or Hispanics/Latinos (11%).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000062#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"People of color report a higher willingness to participate in climate activism to influence elected officials. Approximately 37% of Hispanics/Latinos and 36% of African Americans stated they would 'definitely' or 'probably' join such a campaign, compared to 22% of Whites.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000062#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Global warming's importance as a voting issue for the 2020 Presidential Election varies by racial/ethnic group. For registered voters, 57% of Hispanics/Latinos rank it as 'very important' (6th overall), and 53% of African Americans rank it as 'very important' (though it is 16th in their priority list), while 35% of Whites rank it as 'very important' (17th overall).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000062#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Differences in climate concern are linked to both environmental vulnerability and political affiliation. People of color may be more concerned due to higher exposure to environmental hazards, such as air pollution. Furthermore, when controlling for party identification, the gap in concern between African Americans and Whites disappears, although Hispanics/Latinos remain more Alarmed or Concerned than Whites.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000062#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change","air pollution","environmental justice"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["public opinion survey","demographic analysis"]},{"id":"commyale-000173","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/commyale-000173","title":"American Public Responses to COVID-19","publisher":{"name":"Yale Program on Climate Change Communication","organization":"yale-program-on-climate-change-communication"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2020-04","source_url":"https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/app/uploads/2020/04/american-public-responses-covid19-april-2020b.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report finds that a large majority of Americans prioritize public health over economic recovery, trust medical experts and local news, and have adopted protective behaviors such as handwashing and social distancing. However, significant gaps remain in knowledge regarding certain false claims, and there is a widespread desire for more information and increased action from government leaders and citizens.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000173#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"A vast majority of Americans prioritize stopping the spread of the coronavirus over preventing economic decline, with 84% favoring public health and 16% favoring the economy. This priority holds across all demographic groups, including Republicans, Trump voters, and those seeking work.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000173#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Most Americans believe that the U.S. Congress, President Trump, and citizens themselves should do more to limit the epidemic. Specifically, 38% believe President Trump and 36% believe citizens should be doing \"much more.\"","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000173#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"As of April 7, 2020, there was a prevailing expectation that both the pandemic and the economy would worsen over the following month, with 64% expecting the epidemic to get worse and 70% expecting the economy to get worse.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000173#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"While 94% of Americans followed coronavirus news closely, 80% reported needing more information. The need for \"a lot more information\" was particularly high among African Americans, liberal/moderate Republicans, and urban residents.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000173#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Medical professionals and health organizations are highly trusted sources of information, with approximately 90% of Americans trusting doctors, infectious disease experts, the CDC, and the NIH.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000173#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Public trust in information sources is polarized by party. Democrats show higher trust in national newspapers, national network news, CNN, and MSNBC, while Republicans show higher trust in Fox News.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000173#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Americans demonstrate high knowledge of key COVID-19 facts, such as the effectiveness of handwashing (92%), the risk of large gatherings (92%), and asymptomatic spread (91%). However, knowledge is lower regarding false claims, such as the belief that antibiotics can kill the virus (62% know this is false).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000173#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A large majority of Americans adopted protective behaviors: 90% increased handwashing, 87% maintained 6-foot distancing, and 84% stopped shaking hands. Mask usage was significantly lower, with only 44% wearing a mask in public.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000173#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Younger Americans (18-29) are less likely than other adults to adopt protective measures or perceive social pressure to do so, including lower rates of avoiding gatherings and reducing attendance at places of worship.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000173#insight-9","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Strong social norms exist regarding the pandemic; 92% of Americans believe their family and friends are making a moderate to great deal of effort to limit the spread, and 93% believe it is important to their social circle that they take action.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000173#insight-10","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["public health","economic impact"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["public opinion survey","demographic analysis"]},{"id":"commyale-000175","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/commyale-000175","title":"Americans’ Risk Perceptions and Emotional Responses to COVID-19","publisher":{"name":"Yale Program on Climate Change Communication","organization":"yale-program-on-climate-change-communication"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2020-04","source_url":"https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/app/uploads/2020/04/americans-risk-perceptions-and-emotional-responses-to-covid-19-april-2020.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"A scientific national survey of 3,933 adults conducted in April 2020 reveals that approximately 70% of Americans experienced daily life disruptions due to COVID-19. While majorities feel compassion (64%) and hope (54%), there is widespread worry regarding the healthcare system (85%) and the economy (84%). Risk perceptions are highest for vulnerable populations, such as adults aged 65+ and those with chronic health conditions, while fewer individuals perceive the virus as a great deal of personal harm.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000175#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Approximately 70% of Americans reported that the spread of the coronavirus disrupted their daily life, with 38% stating it disrupted their life \"a lot\" and 34% saying \"some\".","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000175#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Significant portions of the population experienced specific hardships: 18% filed for unemployment, 17% lost a job, 17% were unable to get adequate medical care, and 30% were unable to get groceries.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000175#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The highest levels of concern are focused on systemic failures, with 85% of Americans worried about the healthcare system being overwhelmed and 84% worried about a global economic depression.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000175#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A majority of Americans (54%) reported that worry about the coronavirus has harmed their mental health, though this effect was less pronounced among older adults (60+) and conservative Republicans.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000175#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Positive emotions are prevalent, with 64% of respondents feeling compassionate and 54% feeling hopeful, although 46% also feel anxious.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000175#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Risk perception is skewed toward vulnerable groups; 77% believe the virus will do a \"great deal\" of harm to adults 65+ and those with chronic health conditions, compared to only 25% who believe it will do a \"great deal\" of harm to themselves personally.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000175#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"As of April 7, 2020, the most common estimates for the end of the U.S. epidemic were 2-3 months (35%) or 4-6 months (29%).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000175#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Hispanics/Latinos and liberal/moderate Republicans are more likely than other groups to report experiencing economic consequences such as job or income loss.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000175#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["mental health","economic impact"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["public opinion survey"]},{"id":"commyale-000184","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/commyale-000184","title":"Climate Change in the American Mind","publisher":{"name":"Yale Program on Climate Change Communication","organization":"yale-program-on-climate-change-communication"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2020-04","source_url":"https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/app/uploads/2020/05/climate-change-american-mind-april-2020b.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The April 2020 survey indicates that public engagement with climate change in the U.S. remains at historic highs, with 73% of Americans believing global warming is happening and 62% attributing it to human causes. Despite high levels of personal concern and a sense of responsibility, social norms for action remain weak, and most Americans rarely discuss the issue with family and friends. The report also highlights a significant gap in understanding the strength of the scientific consensus, with only 21% recognizing that over 90% of climate scientists agree on human-caused warming.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000184#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"A record-tying 73% of Americans believe global warming is happening, with 54% expressing extreme or very high certainty, the highest level since surveys began in 2008.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000184#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"While 62% of Americans believe global warming is mostly human-caused, there is a significant gap in understanding the scientific consensus; only 21% know that more than 90% of climate scientists agree on human-caused warming.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000184#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Emotional engagement is high, with 66% of Americans reporting they are at least 'somewhat worried' about global warming, and 26% being 'very worried'.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000184#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Perceptions of immediate harm are increasing, with 45% of Americans believing people in the U.S. are being harmed by global warming 'right now' and 44% stating they have personally experienced its effects.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000184#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Americans perceive the highest risks of harm from global warming to plant and animal species (73%) and future generations (73%), followed by the world's poor (67%) and people in developing countries (66%).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000184#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Social engagement remains low despite personal concern; 64% of Americans 'rarely' or 'never' discuss global warming with family and friends, and fewer than half perceive social norms expecting them to take action.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000184#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Americans conceptualize global warming primarily as an environmental (82%) and scientific (74%) issue, though majorities also view it as agricultural (67%), severe weather (64%), and economic (64%) issues.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000184#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is strong public support for state and local governments to prioritize the protection of agriculture, public water supplies, and public health (all 55%) from global warming effects over the next decade.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000184#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Most Americans (68%) disagree that it is too late to act on global warming, and 47% believe new technologies can solve the problem without requiring individuals to make significant life changes.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000184#insight-9","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change","climate risk","climate change adaptation","extreme weather event","climate change communication"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["public opinion survey"]},{"id":"commyale-000276","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/commyale-000276","title":"Politics & Global Warming","publisher":{"name":"Yale Program on Climate Change Communication","organization":"yale-program-on-climate-change-communication"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2020-04","source_url":"https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/app/uploads/2020/06/politics-global-warming-april-2020c.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report finds that 75% of registered U.S. voters believe global warming is happening, with strong bipartisan support for renewable energy research and the Paris Climate Agreement. However, significant polarization remains regarding the causes of global warming and the Green New Deal, with Democrats viewing climate change as a much higher voting priority than Republicans.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000276#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"A large majority of registered voters believe global warming is occurring, reaching the highest level since 2008. This belief is nearly universal among liberal Democrats (98%) but significantly lower among conservative Republicans (47%).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000276#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is a partisan divide on the cause of global warming: 61% of all registered voters believe it is mostly human-caused, including 92% of liberal Democrats, compared to only 30% of conservative Republicans.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000276#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Global warming is a significant voting issue for Democrats, ranking as the 2nd most important issue for liberal Democrats. In contrast, it is ranked near the bottom of priorities for Republicans.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000276#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is broad, bipartisan support for clean energy policies, including funding renewable energy research (87%), generating renewable energy on public land (86%), and providing tax rebates for energy-efficient vehicles or solar panels (83%).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000276#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A majority of registered voters support carbon pricing mechanisms, with 68% supporting a revenue-neutral carbon tax and 60% supporting a 'Fee and Dividend' policy.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000276#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Green New Deal has substantial overall support at 72%, though this is heavily polarized, with 95% support among Democrats and 37% among conservative Republicans.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000276#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"U.S. participation in the Paris Climate Agreement is supported by 77% of registered voters, and 63% oppose the decision to withdraw from the agreement.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000276#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Voters are split on fossil fuel production: 50% support expanding offshore drilling and 45% support drilling/mining on public lands, while only 30% support drilling in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000276#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is a strong consensus that the private sector should take more action, with 72% of registered voters stating that corporations and industry should do more to address global warming.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000276#insight-9","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Public opinion on climate adaptation is mixed; 39% of voters believe the federal government should help communities move to safer ground nearby, while 24% believe these communities should take care of themselves.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000276#insight-10","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change","renewable energy","carbon tax","carbon dioxide emissions","Green New Deal","Paris Agreement","petroleum industry","climate change adaptation","climate change mitigation","energy efficiency","solar energy","wind power"],"geography_discussed":["Alaska"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["public opinion survey","partisan analysis"]}]}