{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"organization":["Friends of the Earth International"]},"warnings":[]},"total":{"value":1174,"relation":"eq"},"page":49,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?organization=friends-of-the-earth-international&page=49","next":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?organization=friends-of-the-earth-international&page=50","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"foei-000016","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000016","title":"Nota informativa sobre la Meta 8 en el Primer Borrador del Marco Mundial de la Diversidad Biológica Posterior a 2020","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"briefing","language":"es","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/es/publicaciones/nota-informativa-sobre-la-meta-8-diversidad-biologica-posterior-a-2020/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"A briefing by Friends of the Earth International criticizing the climate-related goals in the first draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework, specifically the target of mitigating 10 gigatonnes of CO2 equivalent.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000016#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The author argues that the initial draft of the Global Biodiversity Framework erroneously introduced \"nature-based solutions\" as a response to the interconnected climate and biodiversity crises.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000016#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The briefing criticizes Target 8 of the new draft for proposing that biodiversity be responsible for mitigating 10 gigatonnes of CO2 equivalent, asserting that this prioritizes climate goals over biodiversity conservation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000016#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The document claims that the proposed target of 10 gigatonnes of CO2 equivalent would lead to an increase in tree monoculture plantations and BECCS projects, which result in land grabbing, human rights violations, and a failure to achieve genuine emission reductions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000016#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["biodiversity","nature-based solutions","carbon sequestration","beccs","monoculture plantations"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy critique"]},{"id":"foei-000019","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000019","title":"Double Jeopardy report: how nature based solutions threaten food sovereignty and agroecology","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/publication/double-jeopardy-report-nature-based-solutions/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights"],"summary":{"text":"This report critiques corporate 'net-zero' strategies, arguing that 'nature based solutions' and carbon offsetting lead to land grabbing and dispossession of Indigenous and rural peoples. It highlights the extreme land requirements of companies like Nestlé and Shell and warns that soil carbon sequestration serves corporate interests over small-scale farmers. The report advocates for agroecology as a transformative, people-led alternative to these 'false climate solutions'.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000019#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Corporate 'net-zero' pledges relying on 'nature based solutions' and carbon offsetting pose significant threats to the territories, rights, and livelihoods of rural communities, peasant farmers, and Indigenous Peoples due to massive land requirements. Specifically, Nestlé's offsetting plans could necessitate planting trees on at least 4.4 million hectares of land annually, while Shell's nature-based solutions could require an area nearly the size of Brazil.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000019#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The rise of soil carbon sequestration for carbon credits enables agri-food, tech, and fossil fuel corporations to engage in land and data grabs, potentially forcing small-scale and peasant producers into intensive farming practices for several decades.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000019#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Agroecology is presented as a transformative approach to food production that cools the planet and increases biodiversity through principles of social equity, environmental responsibility, resilience, and resource efficiency. The report asserts that these principles are incompatible with 'nature based solutions' and warns that agroecology risks being coopted by these 'false solutions'.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000019#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":[],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":[]},{"id":"foei-000022","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000022","title":"Rights for Indigenous Peoples and local communities to ensure the well-being of forests and biodiversity","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"policy brief","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/publication/rights-for-indigenous-peoples-and-biodiversity/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights"],"summary":{"text":"This policy brief by Friends of the Earth International argues that forests managed by Indigenous Peoples and local communities (IPLC) are essential for biodiversity conservation and climate justice, but are threatened by extractive industries and certain conservation schemes. The document outlines a framework for public policy recommendations focused on self-determination, land rights, and the protection of traditional knowledge.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000022#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Forests traditionally managed by Indigenous Peoples and local communities (IPLC) are critical for preventing biodiversity extinction and are central to climate justice efforts.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000022#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"IPLC territories face constant threats from mining, logging, underground extraction, and conservation schemes that result in the displacement of people, often because public policies fail to recognize the importance of IPLC forest management or protect collective rights to territories.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000022#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The document's analysis and recommendations center on Community-Conserved Territories and Areas (ICCAs) and Community Forest Management, emphasizing rights related to autonomy, decision-making, land, ecosystem restoration, traditional knowledge, well-being, and gender justice.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000022#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":[],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":[]},{"id":"foei-000026","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000026","title":"El mercado de biodiversidad: un espejismo","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"report","language":"es","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/es/publicaciones/el-mercado-de-biodiversidad-un-espejismo/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document critiques the use of biodiversity offsets and certificates, asserting that these financial mechanisms allow for the destruction of nature in one area to be compensated elsewhere, thereby serving capitalist interests rather than solving the biodiversity crisis.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000026#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Biodiversity offsets and certificates are presented as solutions to the biodiversity crisis but are characterized as market-based strategies that assign financial value to nature and normalize the idea that ecological loss in one location can be offset in another.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000026#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The report contends that these market-based regimes are 'false solutions' driven by neoliberal economic interests focused on monetization and financialization.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000026#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["nature-based solutions","indigenous rights"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy critique"]},{"id":"foei-000030","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000030","title":"Conservación y áreas protegidas – posición","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"statement","language":"es","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/es/publicaciones/conservacion-y-areas-protegidas/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights"],"summary":{"text":"Friends of the Earth International outlines its position on conservation and protected areas, advocating for a rights-based approach to protect biodiversity and the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities within the framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000030#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The document identifies a conflict between human activity and biodiversity, driven by increasing consumption, growth, and the exploitation of natural habitats and resources.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000030#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"While protected areas can be beneficial, the document asserts that many interpretations of them cause irreversible harm to both biodiversity and the people responsible for its protection.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000030#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Friends of the Earth International proposes a conservation model for protected areas based on rights to ensure the protection of biodiversity alongside the rights of local communities and indigenous peoples.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000030#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":[],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":[]},{"id":"foei-000038","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000038","title":"NO ES CERO: Cómo las metas de emisiones “cero neto” encubren la inacción frente al cambio climático","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"report","language":"es","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/es/publicaciones/no-es-cero-inaccion-cambio-climatico-informe/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"A technical report by a coalition of climate justice organizations arguing that \"net zero\" targets are used by governments and polluting corporations to mask inaction, avoid responsibility, and potentially increase fossil fuel emissions through the use of distant goals and unproven technologies.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000038#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The term \"net zero\" is utilized by major polluting companies and governments as a facade to avoid responsibility and hide inaction or harmful activities regarding climate change. The report asserts that \"net zero emissions\" is not equivalent to \"zero emissions.\"","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000038#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Net zero plans often rely on carbon removal technologies and tree plantations, such as Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), but the planet lacks sufficient land to support these projects at the scale proposed by governments and corporations. This reliance allows greenhouse gas emissions to continue increasing while waiting for future carbon removal.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000038#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The report characterizes many net zero targets as a form of \"carbon colonialism\" because they shift the burden of carbon capture to lands and plantations in the Global South, despite those regions contributing little to the climate crisis. Furthermore, targets set for distant dates, such as 2050, are described as insufficient and too late.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000038#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["net zero","carbon capture","beccs","carbon colonialism","climate justice"],"geography_discussed":["Global South"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy critique"]},{"id":"foei-000048","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000048","title":"Justicia climática y la liberación de Palestina: Un mapeo de la complicidad","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"statement","language":"es","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/es/publicaciones/la-liberacion-de-palestina-un-mapeo-de-la-complicidad/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"Friends of the Earth International argues that climate justice is inseparable from the liberation of Palestine, asserting that both the climate crisis and the genocide in Palestine are driven by the same systems of imperialism, neoliberalism, and colonialism.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000048#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Friends of the Earth International claims that the climate collapse and the ongoing occupation and genocide in Palestine are enabled by the same systems of imperialism, neoliberalism, and colonialism, with wealthy governments and transnational corporations profiting from the destruction of ecosystems and lives in both contexts.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000048#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The organization calls on governments to use diplomatic and economic mechanisms to stop Israeli attacks on Gaza and the West Bank, specifically requesting a comprehensive military and energy embargo that includes the cessation of imports and exports of weapons, military assistance, dual-use technology, spare parts, and fuel to Israel.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000048#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The document identifies corporate climate criminals—specifically Chevron, Total, Shell, ENI, and Exxon—and their financiers as complicit in the destruction of Palestinian lives and lands, linking their business models to the suffering of climate-affected communities.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000048#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The statement demands the immediate opening of Gaza's borders for unrestricted entry of food, medicine, and fuel, and insists that Israel comply with the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruling that the occupation of the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip is illegal and must end.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000048#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["climate justice","energy transition","corporate accountability"],"geography_discussed":["Israel"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy statement"]},{"id":"foei-000053","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000053","title":"Concentración de poder en el sistema alimentario mundial y la amenaza de los Grandes Datos","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"report","language":"es","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/es/publicaciones/concentracion-de-poder-en-el-sistema-alimentario-mundial-y-la-amenaza-de-los-grandes-datos/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report warns that mega-mergers and the adoption of big data in the agro-industrial sector are intensifying the concentration of power, which harms the environment, public health, and small-scale farmers who produce over 70 percent of the world's food.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000053#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The global industrial food chain is experiencing unprecedented power concentration due to mega-mergers and acquisitions, a trend that is further intensified by the use of big data in production, distribution, and retail.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000053#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Small-scale food producers, who are responsible for more than 70 percent of global food production, face worsening conditions as power concentration in the industrial food chain increases.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000053#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The ability of corporations to collect and monopolize vast amounts of data—including weather conditions, market prices, yields, and soil information—facilitates corporatization by allowing companies to block competition and increase profits.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000053#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["biodiversity loss","deforestation","food security"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy analysis","socio-economic assessment"]},{"id":"foei-000058","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000058","title":"¡No más violencia, no más silencio!","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"statement","language":"es","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/es/publicaciones/compromiso-contra-violencia-acoso-sexual/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"Friends of the Earth International has established a commitment and a corresponding institutional policy to eliminate sexual violence and harassment within its federation. The organization views violence as a tool of patriarchal control that disproportionately affects marginalized groups, including Black, Indigenous, migrant, and LGBTQ+ women. To combat this, the federation adopts a 'zero tolerance' approach based on five core principles: zero tolerance, prevention, survivor-centricity, confidentiality/protection, and transparency. The document emphasizes prevention through political training and the creation of safe spaces to dismantle patriarchal power structures and ensure an environment where violence is neither normalized nor tolerated.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000058#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Friends of the Earth International defines violence and the threat of violence as mechanisms of control used to maintain patriarchal power dynamics, noting that women face institutionalized, domestic, sexual, verbal, and psychological violence, as well as harassment and persecution, when they deviate from naturalized roles.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000058#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The organization highlights that violence is particularly acute for specific marginalized groups, including Black women, Indigenous women, working-class women, migrants, lesbians, bisexuals, and trans and non-binary people.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000058#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The federation's institutional Policy on Sexual Violence and Harassment is built upon five fundamental guiding principles: zero tolerance for violence, prevention, a survivor-centered approach, confidentiality and protection, and transparency, effectiveness, and established deadlines.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000058#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Prevention is identified as the primary method for responding to sexual violence and harassment, utilizing political training, capacity building, the creation of safe spaces, and institutional practices to dismantle the patriarchy and challenge power relations within the federation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000058#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["environmental justice","human rights"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy statement"]},{"id":"foei-000064","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000064","title":"Justicia de género y manejo comunitario del bosques","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"policy brief","language":"es","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/es/publicaciones/genero-manejo-comunitario-del-bosques/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document argues that community forest management must be viewed through a feminist lens to address the structural violence and oppression women face. It highlights that women possess diversified, holistic knowledge of forests—including agriculture, food, and conservation—and asserts that gender justice is essential for the defense of life and biodiversity. The framework advocates for women's full participation in social, political, and economic life, including autonomous access to water and seeds.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000064#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Women possess a diverse and holistic understanding of forests, specifically regarding species used for health, home, soil fertility, food, and firewood, as well as general species diversity.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000064#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The document identifies racism, colonialism, and patriarchy as integrated systems of oppression that deny rights to women, youth, and sexual minorities.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000064#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Applying a feminist perspective to community forest management allows for the inclusion of emotions, sensitivity, and spiritual practice in the care of forests.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000064#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The framework seeks to ensure women's rights to full social, political, and economic participation, including autonomous access to seeds, water, and production and sale conditions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000064#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["biodiversity"],"geography_discussed":["Guatemala","Malaysia"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy framework"]},{"id":"foei-000077","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000077","title":"Compensaciones y créditos de biodiversidad: preguntas frecuentes","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"fact sheet","language":"es","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/es/publicaciones/compensaciones-y-creditos-de-biodiversidad-preguntas-frecuentes/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"A fact sheet by Friends of the Earth International critiquing biodiversity offsets and credits as ineffective and harmful mechanisms for biodiversity protection and financing.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000077#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Biodiversity offsets and credits are promoted as ways to direct financial resources toward biodiversity protection, but evidence suggests offsets—which are based on carbon markets—can cause significant environmental and social harm. Bio-credit systems are viewed as unlikely to be effective in protecting ecosystems or providing reliable additional funding for conservation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000077#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"These market-driven mechanisms are associated with several risks, including greenwashing, human rights violations, land grabbing, tenure disputes, community displacement, and negative impacts on food sovereignty and ecosystem integrity, often providing little to no economic benefit to local communities.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000077#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The document argues that biodiversity offsets and credits are 'false solutions' and advocates instead for a transformative change that addresses the root causes of biodiversity destruction.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000077#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["biodiversity offsets","biodiversity credits","nature-based solutions","greenwashing","conservation finance"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["critique"]},{"id":"foei-000078","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000078","title":"Friends of the Earth International’s proposal for the new Global Biodiversity Framework","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"briefing","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/publication/cbd-cop15-proposal-for-draft-1/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"Friends of the Earth International provides policy recommendations and targets for the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) to be determined at the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) COP15 meeting in December 2022.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000078#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) is a legally binding agreement whose 2011-2020 framework for action, consisting of 20 \"Aichi targets,\" was not achieved.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000078#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Parties to the CBD are scheduled to meet in Montreal, Canada, in December 2022 for COP15 to establish the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000078#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Friends of the Earth International, contributing to a dedicated open-ended working group and collaborating with the CBD Alliance, has developed a list of 'Dos and Don’ts' and specific policy recommendations and targets for COP15.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000078#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["biodiversity","international agreements","conservation policy"],"geography_discussed":["Montreal","Canada"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy proposal"]},{"id":"foei-000079","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000079","title":"The right to organise and cultural rights essential to community forest management","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/publication/the-right-to-organise-and-cultural-rights-essential-to-community-forest-management/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"This analysis by Friends of the Earth International argues that cultural rights and the right to organise are essential but underdeveloped components of community-based forest management (CFM) at a global level.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000079#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Cultural rights and the right to organise are identified as two essential rights for community-based forest management (CFM) that remain underdeveloped on a global scale. These rights are seen as critical for making the collective and historical practice of CFM a reality and increasing its positive effects.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000079#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"This document is the third in a series of analyses regarding essential rights for community forest management. Previous works in the series focused on providing political substance to identified essential rights and analyzing the treatment of these rights across 17 international agreements.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000079#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["community forest management","cultural rights","right to organise"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["Policy Analysis"]},{"id":"foei-000080","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000080","title":"The EU’s double agenda on globalisation: corporate’s rights vs people’s rights","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"briefing","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/publication/the-eus-double-agenda-on-globalisation-corporates-rights-vs-peoples-rights/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights"],"summary":{"text":"This briefing by Friends of the Earth International examines the European Union's contradictory approach to globalisation, contrasting the EU's support for enforceable corporate investor rights with its reluctance to support binding human rights protections for citizens.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000080#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The European Union and its Member States are significant influencers of globalisation, maintaining a dual approach that empowers corporations through treaties while obstructing mechanisms to hold those companies accountable.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000080#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The EU's double agenda is demonstrated by its opposition to a binding and enforceable UN Treaty on Business and Human Rights, contrasted with its expansion of a system of legally binding investor rights that give corporations significant power over communities and governments.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000080#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":[],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":[]},{"id":"foei-000086","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000086","title":"People Power Now manifesto","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/publication/people-power-now-manifesto/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The 'People Power Now' manifesto by Friends of the Earth International advocates for a systemic shift away from capitalist logic toward a just energy transition. It emphasizes the leadership of indigenous peoples and frontline communities in implementing sustainable initiatives and proposes ten demands to accelerate the transition to a climate-just world.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000086#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The manifesto argues that the scale of current crises necessitates a complete system change to create sustainable societies and new relationships between humans and nature based on reciprocity and equality, expanding existing initiatives that already challenge capitalist logic.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000086#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Friends of the Earth International identifies indigenous peoples and frontline communities as the primary practitioners of the values needed for a just transition and intends to use the manifesto's ten demands as a tool to ensure these communities lead the discourse on solutions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000086#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["energy transition","climate justice"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy statement"]},{"id":"foei-000088","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000088","title":"Resisting the Growing Power of Transnational Corporations in Latin America and the Caribbean","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/publication/resisting-the-growing-power-of-transnational-corporations-in-latin-america-and-the-caribbean/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights"],"summary":{"text":"This report provides a compilation and summary of eight national assessments conducted by Friends of the Earth Latin America and the Caribbean (ATALC) member organisations. It examines the increasing power of transnational corporations within the energy and agriculture sectors and the neoliberal policy frameworks that enable this concentration of power.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000088#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The report synthesises eight national assessments focusing on the increasing influence of transnational corporations in the energy and agriculture sectors, highlighting how specific legislative and policy changes have enabled this concentration of power.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000088#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The concentration of corporate power, supported by government complicity and neoliberal economic models, results in various negative consequences for people, with women experiencing more significant violations of their rights.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000088#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Civil society movements and organisations are advocating at the United Nations for a new, legally-binding human rights treaty to regulate the conduct of transnational corporations.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000088#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":[],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":[]},{"id":"foei-000092","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000092","title":"Documento informativo COP27: ¿Qué está en juego con las falsas soluciones?","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"briefing","language":"es","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/es/publicaciones/documento-informativo-cop27-falsas-soluciones/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"A briefing document by Friends of the Earth International regarding the COP27 climate summit in Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt, which critiques 'false climate solutions' and proposes alternatives for a just energy transition.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000092#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The document identifies several 'false solutions' promoted by the fossil fuel industry, high-emitting industries, and financial institutions to avoid actual emission reductions. These include net zero, carbon markets, offsets, removals, nature-based solutions, and geoengineering, which the author claims allow polluters to continue their activities.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000092#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The briefing specifically highlights REDD/+ and soil carbon farming as examples of nature-based solutions that cause harm to communities, particularly those located in the Global South.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000092#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Friends of the Earth International proposes 'real solutions' to the climate crisis, which include accelerating the transition to a just energy system based on renewables, supporting community forest management and food sovereignty, and establishing binding rules to limit the power of transnational corporations.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000092#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["energy transition","carbon markets","nature-based solutions","net zero","cop27"],"geography_discussed":["Glasgow"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy critique","advocacy"]},{"id":"foei-000095","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000095","title":"Exposing corporate capture of the UN Food Systems Summit through multistakeholderism","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/publication/corporate-capture-un-food-systems-summit-multistakeholderism/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"This report by Friends of the Earth International examines how the UN Food Systems Summit (UNFSS) facilitates 'corporate capture' by shifting from state-led multilateralism to a multistakeholder governance model.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000095#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The UN Food Systems Summit (UNFSS) represents a shift from multilateralism, where States lead decision-making, to multistakeholderism, which incorporates corporations, business associations, donors, academics, and civil society into the formulation and implementation of responses to food system problems.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000095#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Multistakeholderism enables transnational corporations and their associated platforms and associations to influence national and international governance, financing, and policy-making, while advocating for 'false solutions' to food system crises that favor corporate interests.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000095#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["food systems","governance","corporate influence"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy analysis"]},{"id":"foei-000096","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000096","title":"Si no es feminista, no es justa","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"report","language":"es","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/es/publicaciones/si-no-es-feminista-no-es-justa/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"This report outlines a feminist perspective on the energy transition, arguing that current global discourses on a 'just transition' fail to address systemic injustices, including patriarchal oppression, and emphasizes the central role of women in creating lasting solutions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000096#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The current global discourse on a 'just transition' in the context of climate change does not sufficiently address the interconnected systemic injustices inherent in the fossil fuel-based energy system, specifically including patriarchal oppression.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000096#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Women have historically led resistance and developed alternatives to fossil fuel industries, while simultaneously bearing the negative social, economic, health, and political impacts of these industries.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000096#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The Covid-19 pandemic highlighted systemic injustices and gendered vulnerabilities, particularly affecting Black and Indigenous women, LGBTQ women, peasant women, and working-class women, despite their role in supporting communities during the crisis.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000096#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["energy transition","gender justice","fossil fuels","systemic injustice"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy analysis","feminist analysis"]},{"id":"foei-000097","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000097","title":"En el décimo aniversario de Rana Plaza","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"statement","language":"es","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/es/video/decimo-aniversario-de-rana-plaza/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed"],"summary":{"text":"The statement marks the tenth anniversary of the 2013 Rana Plaza collapse in Bangladesh, which killed 1,138 people, 80% of whom were women. It argues that the disaster exemplifies the harm caused by transnational fast fashion companies pursuing profit at the expense of working-class, indigenous, and peasant women in the Global South. The author calls for binding norms to force companies to respect human rights and a shift toward an economic system that prioritizes people and life over profit.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000097#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The 2013 collapse of the Rana Plaza building in Bangladesh, which housed fast fashion textile workshops, resulted in 1,138 deaths, with women making up 80% of the casualties.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000097#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Rana Plaza disaster is cited as an example of the damage transnational companies cause in their pursuit of profit, particularly affecting working-class, indigenous, and peasant women in the Global South.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000097#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["human rights"],"geography_discussed":["Global South"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":[]}]}