{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"organization":["Changing Markets Foundation"]},"warnings":[]},"total":{"value":339,"relation":"eq"},"page":8,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?organization=changing-markets-foundation&page=8","next":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?organization=changing-markets-foundation&page=9","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"chanmar-000205","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/chanmar-000205","title":"Meat and dairy industry commitments and actions to address methane emissions","publisher":{"name":"Changing Markets Foundation","organization":"changing-markets-foundation"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2021-12-20","source_url":"https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Methane-Emissions_Letter-to-Bigard.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Changing Markets Foundation and partner organisations inform Groupe Bigard that it scored 0 out of 100 in a ranking of global meat and dairy companies' climate policies, specifically noting a lack of methane emission reporting and reduction targets. The letter demands disclosure of investments in methane abatement and meat alternatives and recommends the adoption of science-based targets aligned with a 1.5°C limit, including scope 3 emissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000205#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"An analysis of 20 major meat and dairy companies revealed that none report methane emissions separately and none have concrete targets or action plans to reduce methane emissions in their operations and supply chains.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000205#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Groupe Bigard was the lowest ranking company among all global meat and dairy companies assessed, receiving a score of 0 out of 100 due to a lack of action on climate and methane emission reductions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000205#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The authors state that methane is the second largest contributor to climate change, causing approximately 0.5 degrees of temperature increase, and argue that a 45% reduction in methane emissions is required this decade to limit global heating to 1.5°C.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000205#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The letter recommends that Groupe Bigard set science-based targets including scope 3 emissions, establish absolute methane reduction targets rather than intensity targets, and invest in alternative protein production.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000205#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["methane emissions","Scope 3","climate finance"],"geography_discussed":["London","Germany"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy assessment","corporate accountability"]},{"id":"chanmar-000206","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/chanmar-000206","title":"Meat and dairy industry commitments and actions to address methane emissions","publisher":{"name":"Changing Markets Foundation","organization":"changing-markets-foundation"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2021-12-20","source_url":"https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Methane-Emissions_Letter-to-Cargill.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Changing Markets Foundation and partner organisations wrote to Cargill on 20 December 2021, citing a report that found a \"complete lack of action\" among the 20 largest meat and dairy companies regarding methane emissions. The letter highlights that Cargill scored 15.2 out of 100 in the foundation's ranking and lacks specific methane reduction targets or separate reporting for methane emissions. The authors recommend that Cargill set science-based targets aligned with 1.5C, establish absolute methane reduction plans, invest in alternative proteins, and support policies promoting sustainable diets. The letter also requests specific data on investments in methane abatement and meat alternatives over the last five years.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000206#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"An analysis of 20 major meat and dairy companies revealed that none report methane emissions separately and none have concrete targets or action plans to reduce methane emissions in operations and supply chains.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000206#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Cargill received a score of 15.2 out of 100 in the ranking, indicating a lack of action toward reducing methane emissions and a failure to set specific commitments or report methane-specific emissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000206#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"While Cargill has invested in protein alternatives and technical methane abatement research, it does not disclose the percentage of revenue these investments represent.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000206#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"To limit global heating to 1.5C, methane emissions must be reduced by 45% within the current decade.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000206#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["methane emissions","livestock","Scope 3","food system"],"geography_discussed":["United States"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["corporate accountability","policy recommendation"]},{"id":"chanmar-000208","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/chanmar-000208","title":"Meat and dairy industry commitments and actions to address methane emissions","publisher":{"name":"Changing Markets Foundation","organization":"changing-markets-foundation"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2021-12-20","source_url":"https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Methane-Emissions_Letter-to-Danish-Crown.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Changing Markets Foundation and partner organisations critique Danish Crown for its lack of concrete methane reduction targets and reporting, scoring the company 9.6 out of 100 in a ranking of 20 meat and dairy companies. The letter demands disclosure of investments in methane abatement and alternative proteins and recommends the adoption of science-based targets aligned with a 1.5°C limit, including absolute emission reductions and a shift toward sustainable food systems.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000208#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"An analysis of 20 major meat and dairy companies found that none report methane emissions separately, and none have concrete targets or action plans to reduce methane emissions in their operations and supply chains.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000208#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Danish Crown received a score of 9.6 out of 100 in the ranking, indicating a lack of action toward reducing methane emissions and a failure to set specific commitments or report methane-specific emissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000208#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"While Danish Crown is involved in methane abatement research and has small investments in alternative proteins, it does not disclose the percentage of revenue these represent or support a broader transition to low-carbon food systems involving reduced meat and dairy production.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000208#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["methane emissions","Scope 3","food system"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["corporate accountability","policy recommendation"]},{"id":"chanmar-000210","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/chanmar-000210","title":"Meat and dairy industry commitments and actions to address methane emissions","publisher":{"name":"Changing Markets Foundation","organization":"changing-markets-foundation"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2021-12-20","source_url":"https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Methane-Emissions_Letter-to-Danone.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Changing Markets Foundation and partner organisations write to Danone to highlight the company's insufficient action on methane emissions, noting that Danone scored 30.2 out of 100 in a ranking of 20 meat and dairy companies. The letter demands disclosure of investments in methane abatement and alternative proteins and recommends that Danone set science-based targets for absolute methane reductions in line with a 1.5°C global heating limit.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000210#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"An analysis of 20 major meat and dairy companies found a total absence of separate methane emissions reporting and a lack of concrete targets or action plans to reduce methane in operations and supply chains.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000210#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Danone received a score of 30.2 out of 100 in a ranking of meat and dairy companies, indicating insufficient action to reduce methane emissions and a failure to set specific commitments or report methane-specific emissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000210#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"While Danone reports investments in alternative proteins and technical methane abatement research, it does not disclose the percentage of revenue these investments represent or support a broader transition to low-carbon food systems involving reduced meat and dairy production.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000210#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["methane emissions","Scope 3"],"geography_discussed":["France"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["corporate accountability","policy recommendation"]},{"id":"chanmar-000212","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/chanmar-000212","title":"Meat and dairy industry commitments and actions to address methane emissions","publisher":{"name":"Changing Markets Foundation","organization":"changing-markets-foundation"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2021-12-20","source_url":"https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Methane-Emissions_Letter-to-DFA.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Changing Markets Foundation and partner organisations inform the Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) that the company scored 12.8 out of 100 in a ranking of climate policies, indicating a lack of meaningful action to reduce methane emissions. The authors state that none of the 20 companies analysed in their 'Blindspot' report report methane emissions separately or have concrete targets to reduce them. The letter recommends that DFA set science-based targets aligned with 1.5°C, report CO2 and methane separately, invest in alternative proteins, and support policies that shift diets toward sustainable options.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000212#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"An analysis of 20 major meat and dairy companies revealed that none report methane emissions separately and none have concrete targets or action plans to reduce methane emissions in their operations and supply chains.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000212#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) received a score of 12.8 out of 100 in the ranking, reflecting a lack of meaningful action on methane reduction and a failure to set specific commitments or report methane-specific emissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000212#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"While DFA has made some investments in technical methane abatement research, it does not disclose what percentage of its revenue these investments represent and lacks support for transitioning to low-carbon food systems, including reducing meat and dairy production.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000212#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["methane emissions","Scope 3"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy assessment","corporate accountability"]},{"id":"chanmar-000215","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/chanmar-000215","title":"Meat and dairy industry commitments and actions to address methane emissions","publisher":{"name":"Changing Markets Foundation","organization":"changing-markets-foundation"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2021-12-20","source_url":"https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Methane-Emissions_Letter-to-Fonterra.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Changing Markets Foundation and partner organisations argue that major meat and dairy companies, specifically Fonterra, are failing to address methane emissions. They recommend the adoption of science-based targets, separate reporting for methane and CO2, and increased investment in alternative proteins to align with the 1.5°C global heating limit.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000215#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"An analysis of 20 major meat and dairy companies revealed a total absence of separate methane emissions reporting and a lack of concrete targets or action plans to reduce methane in operations and supply chains.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000215#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Fonterra received a score of 18.2 out of 100 in the 'Blindspot' report ranking, indicating a lack of action toward reducing methane emissions and a failure to set specific commitments or report methane-specific emissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000215#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"While Fonterra has invested in protein alternatives and technical methane abatement research, it does not disclose the percentage of revenue these investments represent nor support a transition to low-carbon food systems involving reduced meat and dairy production.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000215#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["methane emissions","Scope 3"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy recommendation","corporate accountability"]},{"id":"chanmar-000217","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/chanmar-000217","title":"Meat and dairy industry commitments and actions to address methane emissions","publisher":{"name":"Changing Markets Foundation","organization":"changing-markets-foundation"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2021-12-20","source_url":"https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Methane-Emissions_Letter-to-FrieslandCampina.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Changing Markets Foundation and partner organisations write to FrieslandCampina to highlight the company's lack of action on methane emissions, scoring it 8.8 out of 100 in a ranking of 20 meat and dairy companies. The letter demands disclosure of investments in methane abatement and alternative proteins and recommends setting absolute methane reduction targets aligned with a 1.5°C limit.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000217#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"An analysis of 20 major meat and dairy companies found that none report methane emissions separately and none have concrete targets or action plans to reduce methane emissions in their operations and supply chains.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000217#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"FrieslandCampina received a score of 8.8 out of 100 in the ranking, indicating a lack of action toward reducing methane emissions and a failure to set specific commitments or report methane-specific emissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000217#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"While FrieslandCampina has made minor investments in protein alternatives and technical methane abatement research, it does not disclose what percentage of its revenue these investments represent.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000217#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["methane emissions","Scope 3"],"geography_discussed":["Netherlands","London","Glasgow"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["corporate accountability","policy recommendation"]},{"id":"chanmar-000218","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/chanmar-000218","title":"Meat and dairy industry commitments and actions to address methane emissions","publisher":{"name":"Changing Markets Foundation","organization":"changing-markets-foundation"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2021-12-20","source_url":"https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Methane-Emissions_Letter-to-Itoham.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags"],"summary":{"text":"The Changing Markets Foundation and partner organisations inform Itoham Foods Inc. that it scored 1.6 out of 100 in a ranking of meat and dairy companies' climate policies, specifically noting a lack of methane-specific emissions reporting and targets. The letter demands disclosure of investments in methane abatement and alternative proteins and recommends the adoption of science-based targets aligned with a 1.5°C limit, including the reduction of absolute emissions and support for sustainable diets.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000218#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"An analysis of 20 major meat and dairy companies found that none report methane emissions separately and none have concrete targets or action plans to reduce methane emissions in their operations and supply chains.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000218#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Itoham Foods Inc. received a score of 1.6 out of 100 in the ranking, reflecting a lack of action on methane reduction, a failure to set specific commitments or targets, and a failure to report methane-specific emissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000218#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"While Itoham has made small investments in alternative proteins, it does not disclose the percentage of revenue these represent and lacks explicit support for transitioning to low-carbon food systems that reduce meat and dairy production and consumption.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000218#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["methane emissions","Scope 3"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":[]},{"id":"chanmar-000220","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/chanmar-000220","title":"Meat and dairy industry commitments and actions to address methane emissions","publisher":{"name":"Changing Markets Foundation","organization":"changing-markets-foundation"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2021-12-20","source_url":"https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Methane-Emissions_Letter-to-JBS.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Changing Markets Foundation and partner organisations write to JBS Foods to demand concrete action and transparency regarding methane emissions. Citing their 'Blindspot' report, the authors state that none of the 20 largest meat and dairy companies analysed report methane emissions separately or have meaningful targets to reduce them. JBS specifically scored 9.6 out of 100 in the ranking. The letter recommends that JBS set science-based targets aligned with 1.5°C, report absolute emissions rather than intensity, and invest in alternative proteins. It also requests specific data on investments in methane abatement and meat alternatives over the last five years.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000220#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"An analysis of 20 major meat and dairy companies revealed a systemic failure to address methane emissions, with none of the companies reporting methane separately or possessing concrete action plans for its reduction.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000220#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"JBS scored 9.6 out of 100 in the 'Blindspot' report ranking, indicating a lack of action toward reducing methane emissions and a failure to set specific commitments or report methane-specific emissions for its supply chains and operations.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000220#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The authors argue that methane is the second largest contributor to climate change, responsible for approximately 0.5 degree of temperature increase, and must be reduced by 45% this decade to limit global heating to 1.5°C.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000220#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The letter recommends that JBS shift its focus toward reducing absolute emissions rather than emissions intensity and avoid overreliance on unproven technical solutions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000220#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["methane emissions","Scope 3","tipping points in the climate system","food system"],"geography_discussed":["Brazil"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["corporate accountability","policy recommendation"]},{"id":"chanmar-000222","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/chanmar-000222","title":"Meat and dairy industry commitments and actions to address methane emissions","publisher":{"name":"Changing Markets Foundation","organization":"changing-markets-foundation"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2021-12-20","source_url":"https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Methane-Emissions_Letter-to-Lactalis.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Changing Markets Foundation and partner organisations wrote to Lactalis Group on 20 December 2021, citing a report that found a \"complete lack of action\" among the 20 largest meat and dairy companies regarding methane emissions. The letter highlights that Lactalis scored 3.2 out of 100 in their ranking and lacks specific methane targets or separate emissions reporting. The authors recommend that Lactalis set science-based targets aligned with a 1.5°C limit, establish absolute methane reduction plans, invest in alternative proteins, and support policies promoting sustainable diets. The letter also requests specific data on investments in methane abatement and dairy alternatives over the last five years.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000222#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"An analysis of 20 major meat and dairy companies revealed that none report methane emissions separately and none have concrete targets or action plans to reduce methane emissions in their operations and supply chains.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000222#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Lactalis scored 3.2 out of 100 in the analysis, indicating a lack of action toward methane emission reductions and a failure to set specific commitments or report methane-specific emissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000222#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"While Lactalis has made some investments in protein alternatives and technical methane abatement research, it does not disclose what percentage of its revenue these investments represent.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000222#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"To limit global heating to 1.5°C, methane emissions must be reduced by 45% within the current decade.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000222#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["methane emissions","Scope 3","food system"],"geography_discussed":["France"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["corporate accountability","policy recommendation"]},{"id":"chanmar-000224","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/chanmar-000224","title":"RE: Meat and dairy industry commitments and actions to address methane emissions","publisher":{"name":"Changing Markets Foundation","organization":"changing-markets-foundation"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2021-12-20","source_url":"https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Methane-Emissions_Letter-to-Marfrig.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Changing Markets Foundation and partner organizations write to Marfrig to highlight the company's lack of concrete methane reduction targets and to request specific data on investments in abatement technologies and meat alternatives.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000224#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"An analysis of 20 major meat and dairy companies found that none report methane emissions separately and none have concrete targets or action plans to reduce methane emissions in their operations and supply chains.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000224#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Marfrig received a score of 11.2 out of 100 in the 'Blindspot' report ranking, indicating a lack of action toward reducing methane emissions and a failure to set specific commitments or report methane-specific emissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000224#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"While Marfrig has invested in protein alternatives and technical methane abatement research, it does not disclose the percentage of revenue these investments represent and lacks explicit support for transitioning to low-carbon food systems that include reducing meat and dairy production.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000224#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["methane emissions","Scope 3"],"geography_discussed":["Brazil"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy assessment","corporate accountability"]},{"id":"chanmar-000225","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/chanmar-000225","title":"Meat and dairy industry commitments and actions to address methane emissions","publisher":{"name":"Changing Markets Foundation","organization":"changing-markets-foundation"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2021-12-20","source_url":"https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Methane-Emissions_Letter-to-Mengniu-Dairy.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Changing Markets Foundation and partner organisations inform Mengniu Dairy that it scored 4.0 out of 100 in a ranking of climate policies, noting the company has not set specific methane reduction targets or reported methane-specific emissions. The authors call for the company to adopt science-based targets aligned with a 1.5°C limit, report CO2 and methane separately, and invest in alternative proteins.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000225#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"An analysis of 20 major meat and dairy companies revealed that none report methane emissions separately and none have concrete targets or action plans to reduce methane emissions in their operations and supply chains.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000225#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Mengniu Dairy received a score of 4.0 out of 100 in the ranking, indicating a lack of action toward reducing methane emissions and a failure to set specific commitments or report methane-specific emissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000225#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"While Mengniu Dairy has invested in alternative proteins, it does not report on these investments and lacks explicit support for transitions to low-carbon food systems, including reducing meat and dairy production and consumption.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000225#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["methane emissions","Scope 3"],"geography_discussed":["Hong Kong"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy assessment","corporate accountability"]},{"id":"chanmar-000227","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/chanmar-000227","title":"Meat and dairy industry commitments and actions to address methane emissions","publisher":{"name":"Changing Markets Foundation","organization":"changing-markets-foundation"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2021-12-20","source_url":"https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Methane-Emissions_Letter-to-Nestle.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Changing Markets Foundation and partner organisations write to Nestlé CEO Mark Schneider to demand transparency and action on methane emissions. Referencing their 'Blindspot' report, the authors state that none of the 20 largest meat and dairy companies analysed report methane emissions separately or have concrete targets to reduce them. Nestlé specifically scored 34.6 out of 100 in the ranking, indicating insufficient action. The letter requests specific data on investments in methane abatement and meat alternatives over the last five years and recommends that Nestlé set science-based targets for absolute emissions reductions, including scope 3, and support policies that drive a shift toward sustainable diets.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000227#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"An analysis of 20 major meat and dairy companies revealed that none report methane emissions separately, and none have concrete targets or action plans to reduce methane emissions in their operations and supply chains.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000227#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Nestlé received a score of 34.6 out of 100 in the 'Blindspot' report ranking, which the authors describe as showing insufficient action toward reducing methane emissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000227#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"While Nestlé invests in alternative protein and technical methane abatement research, it does not disclose the percentage of revenue these investments represent, nor does it explicitly support policies for reducing meat and dairy production and consumption.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000227#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["methane emissions","Scope 3","food system","climate policy"],"geography_discussed":["Switzerland"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["corporate accountability","policy recommendation"]},{"id":"chanmar-000228","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/chanmar-000228","title":"Meat and dairy industry commitments and actions to address methane emissions","publisher":{"name":"Changing Markets Foundation","organization":"changing-markets-foundation"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2021-12-20","source_url":"https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Methane-Emissions_Letter-to-NH-Foods.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Changing Markets Foundation and partner organisations inform NH Foods Ltd that it scored 7.2 out of 100 in a ranking of meat and dairy companies' climate policies, citing a lack of specific methane reduction targets or separate emissions reporting. The authors demand disclosure of investments in methane abatement and alternative proteins over the last five years and recommend that the company set absolute methane reduction targets aligned with a 1.5°C global heating limit.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000228#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"An analysis of 20 major meat and dairy companies found that none report methane emissions separately and none have concrete targets or action plans to reduce methane emissions in their operations and supply chains.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000228#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"NH Foods Group received a score of 7.2 out of 100 in the ranking, reflecting a lack of action on methane emissions and a failure to set specific commitments or report methane-specific emissions for its supply chains and operations.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000228#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"While NH Foods Group has invested in alternative proteins and technical methane abatement research, it does not disclose the percentage of revenue these investments represent.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000228#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["methane emissions","Scope 3"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["corporate accountability","policy recommendation"]},{"id":"chanmar-000229","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/chanmar-000229","title":"Meat and dairy industry commitments and actions to address methane emissions","publisher":{"name":"Changing Markets Foundation","organization":"changing-markets-foundation"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2021-12-20","source_url":"https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Methane-Emissions_Letter-to-OSI.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed"],"summary":{"text":"The Changing Markets Foundation and partner organisations write to OSI Group to highlight the company's poor performance in methane emission reductions, scoring 4.0 out of 100 in a ranking of 20 meat and dairy companies. The letter notes that none of the analysed companies report methane emissions separately or have concrete targets to reduce them. It recommends that OSI Group set science-based targets aligned with 1.5°C, establish absolute methane reduction plans, invest in alternative proteins, and support policies promoting sustainable diets. The authors request specific data on investments in methane abatement and meat alternatives over the last five years.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000229#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"An analysis of 20 major meat and dairy companies revealed a systemic failure to address methane emissions, with none of the companies reporting methane emissions separately or possessing concrete action plans or targets for their reduction in operations and supply chains.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000229#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"OSI Group specifically scored 4.0 out of 100 in the ranking, indicating a lack of action toward reducing methane emissions and a failure to set specific commitments or report methane-specific emissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000229#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"While OSI Group has invested in alternative proteins, it does not disclose the percentage of revenue these represent and lacks explicit support for transitioning to low-carbon food systems that include reducing meat and dairy production and consumption.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000229#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["methane emissions","Scope 3"],"geography_discussed":["United States"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":[]},{"id":"chanmar-000231","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/chanmar-000231","title":"Meat and dairy industry commitments and actions to address methane emissions","publisher":{"name":"Changing Markets Foundation","organization":"changing-markets-foundation"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2021-12-20","source_url":"https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Methane-Emissions_Letter-to-Saputo.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Changing Markets Foundation and partner organisations inform Saputo Inc. that the company scored 8.0 out of 100 in a ranking of meat and dairy companies' climate policies, specifically noting a lack of methane-specific targets or reporting. The letter demands disclosure of investments in methane abatement and alternative proteins, and recommends that Saputo adopt science-based targets aligned with a 1.5°C limit, including scope 3 emissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000231#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"An analysis of 20 major meat and dairy companies found that none report methane emissions separately and none have concrete targets or action plans to reduce methane emissions in operations and supply chains.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000231#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Saputo Inc. received a score of 8.0 out of 100 in the ranking, reflecting a lack of action on methane emissions and a failure to set specific commitments or report methane-specific emissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000231#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"While Saputo has invested in alternative proteins, the company does not disclose the percentage of revenue these represent and lacks explicit support for transitions to low-carbon food systems, including reduced meat and dairy production.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000231#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["methane emissions","Scope 3"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["corporate accountability","policy recommendation"]},{"id":"chanmar-000233","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/chanmar-000233","title":"Meat and dairy industry commitments and actions to address methane emissions","publisher":{"name":"Changing Markets Foundation","organization":"changing-markets-foundation"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2021-12-20","source_url":"https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Methane-Emissions_Letter-to-Tyson.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Changing Markets Foundation and partner organisations write to Tyson Foods to demand the implementation of science-based methane reduction targets and the disclosure of investments in methane abatement and alternative proteins. The letter references a report, 'Blindspot', which found that none of the 20 largest meat and dairy companies analysed report methane emissions separately or have concrete action plans to reduce them. Specifically, Tyson Foods scored 11.2 out of 100 in the ranking, showing no action toward methane reduction. The authors recommend that Tyson set targets aligned with a 1.5°C limit, report absolute emissions rather than intensity, and support policies that shift diets toward sustainable, low-carbon food systems.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000233#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"An analysis of 20 major meat and dairy companies revealed a total absence of separate methane emissions reporting and a lack of concrete targets or action plans to reduce methane in operations and supply chains.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000233#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Tyson Foods received a score of 11.2 out of 100 in the 'Blindspot' report ranking, indicating a lack of action regarding methane emissions reduction and a failure to set specific commitments or report methane-specific emissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000233#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"While Tyson Foods invests in alternative proteins, it does not disclose the percentage of revenue these investments represent nor does it explicitly support transitions to low-carbon food systems that include reducing meat and dairy production.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000233#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["methane emissions","Scope 3"],"geography_discussed":["World"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy recommendation","corporate accountability"]},{"id":"chanmar-000234","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/chanmar-000234","title":"Meat and dairy industry commitments and actions to address methane emissions","publisher":{"name":"Changing Markets Foundation","organization":"changing-markets-foundation"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2021-12-20","source_url":"https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Methane-Emissions_Letter-to-Vion.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Changing Markets Foundation and partner organisations inform Vion Food Group that it scored 4.0 out of 100 in a ranking of meat and dairy companies' climate policies, specifically noting a lack of methane-specific emissions reporting and reduction targets. The authors recommend that Vion set science-based targets aligned with 1.5°C, report CO2 and methane emissions separately, and invest in alternative proteins. The letter requests specific data on investments in methane abatement and meat alternatives over the last five years.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000234#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"An analysis of 20 major meat and dairy companies revealed that none report methane emissions separately or have concrete targets and action plans to reduce methane emissions in their operations and supply chains.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000234#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Vion Food Group received a score of 4.0 out of 100 in the ranking, indicating a lack of action toward reducing methane emissions and a failure to set specific commitments or report methane-specific emissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000234#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"While Vion has invested in alternative proteins, it does not disclose the percentage of revenue these represent and lacks explicit support for transitioning to low-carbon food systems that include reducing meat and dairy production and consumption.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000234#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["methane emissions","Scope 3"],"geography_discussed":["Netherlands"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy assessment","corporate accountability"]},{"id":"chanmar-000237","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/chanmar-000237","title":"Meat and dairy industry commitments and actions to address methane emissions","publisher":{"name":"Changing Markets Foundation","organization":"changing-markets-foundation"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2021-12-20","source_url":"https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Methane-Emissions_Letter-to-Yili.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Changing Markets Foundation and partner organisations write to Yili Industrial Group highlighting that the company scored 3.2 out of 100 in a ranking of climate policies, indicating a lack of action on methane emissions. The authors demand disclosure of investments in methane abatement and protein alternatives, and recommend that Yili set absolute methane reduction targets and support policies for sustainable diets.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000237#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"An analysis of 20 major meat and dairy companies revealed that none report methane emissions separately and none have concrete targets or action plans to reduce methane emissions in their operations and supply chains.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000237#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Inner Mongolia Yili Industrial Group CO. Ltd. was identified as one of the lowest scoring dairy companies in the analysis, receiving a score of 3.2 out of 100.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000237#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Yili has not set specific commitments or action plans for methane reduction, nor does it report methane-specific emissions for its supply chains and operations.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000237#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"While Yili has made some investments in protein alternatives, it does not disclose the percentage of revenue these represent and lacks explicit support for transitioning to low-carbon food systems that reduce meat and dairy production.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000237#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["methane emissions","Scope 3"],"geography_discussed":["World"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["corporate accountability","policy recommendation"]},{"id":"chanmar-000136","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/chanmar-000136","title":"Microsoft Word - European Commission letter_Global methane pledge_December21_CLEAN_v2.docx","publisher":{"name":"Changing Markets Foundation","organization":"changing-markets-foundation"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2021-12-16","source_url":"https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/European-Commission-letter_Global-methane-pledge.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Changing Markets Foundation and other organisations urge the European Commission to strengthen the 2020 EU Methane Strategy by setting specific EU-wide and national targets for the agriculture sector. They highlight that agriculture accounts for 53% of anthropogenic methane emissions in the EU, with the vast majority coming from enteric fermentation and manure management. The authors call for binding monitoring, reporting, and reduction measures for large meat and dairy corporations, noting that none of the 20 largest EU-headquartered firms in this sector currently report their methane emissions. They specifically recommend targeting large farms with more than 50 livestock units, which are responsible for approximately 40% of all methane emissions in the EU.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000136#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The authors argue that the European Commission must increase methane reduction ambitions to align with the 2021 UNEP Global Methane Assessment, which states that at least 45% of global methane reductions by 2030 are necessary to maintain the 1.5°C target of the Paris Climate Agreement.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000136#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Agriculture is identified as a primary source of emissions in the EU, accounting for 53% of anthropogenic methane emissions, with 98% of those originating from manure management and enteric fermentation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000136#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The letter reports a lack of transparency among major food corporations, stating that none of the 20 largest meat and dairy companies headquartered in the EU report their methane emissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000136#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The authors suggest that the European Commission implement specific measures for large farms with more than 50 livestock units, as these entities account for roughly 40% of all methane emissions in the EU and 70% of agricultural methane emissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000136#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["methane emissions","livestock","agriculture","Paris Agreement","Scope 3"],"geography_discussed":["World"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy recommendation","advocacy"]}]}