{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"geography":["global south"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'global south' for facet 'geography' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":154,"relation":"eq"},"page":7,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?geography=global+south&page=7","next":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?geography=global+south&page=8","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"catf-000725","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/catf-000725","title":"Land & Climate OVERVIEW","publisher":{"name":"Clean Air Task Force","organization":"clean-air-task-force"},"document_type":"fact sheet","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://cdn.catf.us/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/01162652/CATF_LandClimate_Overview.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Clean Air Task Force (CATF) has established a Land & Climate Program to address the complexities of land competition and its role as both a source and sink of greenhouse gas emissions. The program focuses on three pillars: Ecosystem-Based Carbon Removal, Climate-Beneficial Bioenergy, and Land-Smart Clean Energy Deployment. CATF intends to create a global hub of scholars and organizations to map land conflicts and develop solutions. While currently most active in the U.S., the program is expanding into Europe and focusing on forested areas in the Global South. To implement these strategies, CATF is seeking $2.5 million per year for the next three years.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000725#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"CATF's Land & Climate Program is structured around three primary pillars: Ecosystem-Based Carbon Removal, which focuses on transparency in nature-based offsets; Climate-Beneficial Bioenergy, which aims to ensure bioenergy is compatible with food production; and Land-Smart Clean Energy Deployment, which promotes landscape-scale energy planning through the Grounding Clean Energy initiative.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000725#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"To address land competition, CATF is exploring the establishment of a global hub comprising NGOs, international organizations, and scholars to use global scenarios to identify acute land conflicts and develop solutions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000725#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The program's current geographic activity is centered in the U.S., with plans to determine priorities for Europe in the coming year and a specific focus on forested areas in the Global South for natural climate solutions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000725#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"CATF requires $2.5 million annually for the next three years to fund staff leads for program pillars, policy experts, research, and international policy advocacy.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000725#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["land use","carbon dioxide removal","nature-based solutions","bioenergy","energy transition","carbon sink"],"geography_discussed":["Europe","Global South","World"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["programmatic overview","strategic planning"]},{"id":"ciel-000310","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/ciel-000310","title":"DECENTRALIZATION AND COMMUNITY-BASED PROPERTY RIGHTS","publisher":{"name":"Center for International Environmental Law","organization":"center-for-international-environmental-law"},"document_type":"briefing","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/cbpr.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed"],"summary":{"text":"The document advocates for the legal recognition of community-based property rights (CBPRs) in the Global South, arguing that such rights are distinct from Western individual property concepts and state-led decentralization. It posits that recognizing CBPRs—particularly for indigenous peoples—helps protect ancestral territories, prevents resource commodification, and fosters environmental justice. However, the text notes that property rights alone are insufficient for sustainable development and must be paired with technical assistance, credit programs, and strong procedural rights.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ciel-000310#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Community-based property rights (CBPRs) differ from Western property concepts, which rely on state-protected private individual rights or socialist state ownership. While some fear the term 'property rights' encourages commodification, the document argues that CBPRs are less prone to this because they are group-held and require collective decision-making for any sale.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ciel-000310#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Decentralization to local government units is distinct from the recognition of CBPRs and does not automatically support them; in some cases, local officials may use decentralization to maintain legal control of resources to fund government costs.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ciel-000310#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["environmental justice","natural resource management","indigenous rights","sustainable development"],"geography_discussed":["Indonesia"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":[]},{"id":"fftreaty-000020","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/fftreaty-000020","title":"HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, INCLUDING THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION, CALL FOR FOSSIL FUEL TREATY TO PROTECT LIVES OF CURRENT AND FUTURE GENERATIONS","publisher":{"name":"Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty Initiative","organization":"fossil-fuel-non-proliferation-treaty-initiative"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.fossilfueltreaty.org/health-letter","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"A coalition of health professionals, including the World Health Organization, advocates for a global Fossil Fuel Treaty to end the expansion of fossil fuel infrastructure and phase out existing production. The statement argues that burning fossil fuels causes millions of premature deaths via air pollution and drives a climate crisis that threatens healthcare systems, food security, and mental health. It emphasizes that these health burdens disproportionately affect the Global South, Indigenous peoples, and marginalized communities, and calls for a just transition supported by high-income countries.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000020#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The proposed Fossil Fuel Treaty would be a legally binding international agreement focused on three main goals: immediately ending the expansion of new fossil fuel infrastructure and production, phasing out existing production and use in line with the 1.5C goal, and ensuring a just transition for workers and communities that respects Indigenous rights.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000020#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Burning fossil fuels is linked to severe health crises, including over seven million premature deaths annually from air pollution, which contributes to cancers, respiratory conditions, and cardiovascular disease. Phasing out fossil fuels is estimated to prevent 3.6 million deaths from ambient air pollution worldwide every year.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000020#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The document identifies diverse health risks across the entire fossil fuel lifecycle, including respiratory ailments and poor birth outcomes for those near oil and gas extraction, lung disease and cancers for those near coal mines, and childhood asthma and hematological malignancies for those near petrochemical refineries.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000020#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Climate change driven by fossil fuels creates systemic health threats, such as increasing the transmission of vector-borne, food-borne, and water-borne diseases, exacerbating mental health issues like anxiety and depression in youth, and disrupting medical supply chains and healthcare facilities through extreme weather.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000020#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Health impacts are unequally distributed, falling most heavily on populations in the Global South, Indigenous peoples, and those experiencing poverty or racial discrimination, despite these groups being the least historically responsible for emissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000020#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["fossil-fuel phase-out","air pollution","climate change","just transition","public health","renewable energy","carbon capture and storage","indigenous rights","climate justice"],"geography_discussed":["Global South"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy recommendation","health impact assessment"]},{"id":"fftreaty-000021","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/fftreaty-000021","title":"Letter for a Fossil Fuel Treaty","publisher":{"name":"Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty Initiative","organization":"fossil-fuel-non-proliferation-treaty-initiative"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.fossilfueltreaty.org/faith-letter-archive","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"A coalition of 624 global faith institutions argues that the continued expansion of fossil fuels threatens the 1.5°C goal of the Paris Agreement and disproportionately harms vulnerable populations. The signatories call for a binding global treaty to end the expansion of coal, oil, and gas production and to facilitate a global just transition to 100% renewable energy, emphasizing the moral imperative of stewardship and equity.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000021#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The signatories assert that current fossil fuel production levels are incompatible with the Paris Agreement's 1.5°C target, noting that \"Too many coal mines and oil and gas wells are already under production, setting the world on course to fail to meet the Paris Agreement’s goal of 1.5°C.\"","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000021#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The document highlights a contradiction between government rhetoric regarding 'net zero' and their actual approvals for fossil fuel expansion, describing this as \"a dangerous veil to evade responsibility, delay action, and rely on unproven technologies.\"","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000021#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Citing the IPCC, the statement notes that fossil fuels (coal, oil, and gas) were responsible for 86% of CO2 emissions over the last decade, and that \"Just 100 companies account for more than 70% of emissions.\"","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000021#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The authors argue that the costs of fossil fuel extraction and combustion—including pollution and health impacts—are \"disproportionately paid by those who are most vulnerable to, and least historically responsible for, the consequences of climate change\".","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000021#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The faith institutions call for a binding global Fossil Fuel Treaty with two primary objectives: ending the expansion of new coal, oil, or gas production based on IPCC and UNEP science, and ensuring a \"global just transition to 100% access to renewable energy globally\".","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000021#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The call for a treaty is supported by 624 signatories, including global organizations such as the World Council of Churches, Islamic Relief Worldwide, and the Laudato Si' Movement, as well as numerous national and local faith institutions across Africa, Asia, Europe, North America, and Oceania.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000021#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["petroleum industry","coal","petroleum","natural gas","renewable energy","just transition","Paris Agreement","Net-zero emissions","carbon dioxide emissions","climate justice","fossil-fuel divestment"],"geography_discussed":["Global South"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy recommendation","moral appeal"]},{"id":"fftreaty-000042","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/fftreaty-000042","title":"A Global Just Transition From Fossil Fuels","publisher":{"name":"Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty Initiative","organization":"fossil-fuel-non-proliferation-treaty-initiative"},"document_type":"briefing","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.fossilfueltreaty.org/s/Concept-Note-A-Global-Just-Transition-From-Fossil-Fuels.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document details the third pillar of the Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty Initiative, focusing on a global just transition. It advocates for decentralized, people-centered renewable energy systems and the economic diversification of fossil-fuel-dependent nations. The text emphasizes that a successful transition requires wealthy nations to provide financial support and a 'fair share' of effort, while rejecting 'dangerous distractions' like carbon offsets and geoengineering. It calls for a fundamental shift from GDP-driven growth to 'well-being economies' to address the systemic root causes of the climate crisis.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000042#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty Initiative is based on three pillars: non-proliferation (ending exploration), fair phase-out (regulating supply and removing subsidies), and a global just transition to 100% renewable energy.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000042#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Future renewable energy systems must move away from centralized models toward distributed, decentralized provision with diversified ownership involving households, cooperatives, and public entities.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000042#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A just transition must protect workers in fossil fuel, industrial agriculture, and transportation sectors through social dialogue, skills development, and a proposed global social protection fund.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000042#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The transition to renewables risks creating new injustices, such as increased corporate power, labor exploitation, and environmental damage from mineral extraction in the Global South, specifically for cobalt, silver, and rare earth metals.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000042#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Economic diversification for fossil-fuel-dependent countries requires international support, including debt cancellation, tax reforms, and the transformation of state-owned corporations into renewable energy providers.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000042#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The document identifies 'dangerous distractions' that delay real action, including distant net-zero targets, carbon offsetting, and geoengineering technologies like BECCS and solar geoengineering.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000042#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Current global financial flows are described as extractive, with USD 2 trillion flowing annually from the poorest to the richest countries, which undermines the ability of developing nations to transition.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000042#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The IPCC's carbon budgets are characterized as overly optimistic, and the document argues that wealthy countries like the US, UK, and Sweden should target domestic reduction rates of 10-20% annually over the next decade.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000042#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["just transition","renewable energy","economic diversity","distributed generation","climate finance","carbon budget","carbon neutrality","carbon offset","geoengineering","bio-energy with carbon capture and storage","agroecology","social protection","critical minerals"],"geography_discussed":["Global South","United States","United Kingdom","Sweden","Tanzania"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy framework","strategic concept note"]},{"id":"fftreaty-000046","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/fftreaty-000046","title":"DEVELOPING A TRANSPARENCY ARRANGEMENT FOR INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION ON FOSSIL FUEL PRODUCTION","publisher":{"name":"Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty Initiative","organization":"fossil-fuel-non-proliferation-treaty-initiative"},"document_type":"policy brief","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.fossilfueltreaty.org/s/Developing-a-Transparency-Arrangement-for-Intergovernmental-Cooperation-on-Fossil-Fuel-Production.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The policy brief argues for a systematic intergovernmental mechanism to collect and review data on fossil fuel production to close the 'production gap'. It suggests a framework combining technical expert verification with political peer review, while allowing for differentiated reporting requirements based on a country's capacity or production share. The authors emphasize the need for capacity-building support for the Global South, formal roles for non-state actors to ensure accountability, and a staged approach to follow-up that moves from facilitative learning to goal-oriented accountability.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000046#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"A transparency arrangement is necessary because current information on fossil fuel production is \"incomplete, inconsistent and scattered across a range of transparency initiatives\", which hinders the ability to align production with the 1.5°C goal.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000046#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"To balance the need for comprehensive data with the varying capabilities of nations, the arrangement should use a \"bounded approach to differentiation\". This includes tiered reporting guidance—categorizing information as 'must have' (Tier 1), 'should have' (Tier 2), and 'nice to have' (Tier 3)—and varying the frequency of reviews based on a country's share of global production.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000046#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The proposed review process should be dual-tracked: technical experts would verify data for \"accuracy, completeness, consistency\" to ensure reliability, while a political peer review process would facilitate trust-building and the sharing of best practices.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000046#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Follow-up mechanisms should evolve through a staged process, beginning with a \"facilitative review\" focused on learning and information gathering, progressing to a global review for gap analysis, and concluding with \"goal-oriented accountability\" where states must respond to recommendations for behavioral change.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000046#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Non-state actors, including civil society, should have a formalized role in the process through the submission of \"comments and shadow reports\" to hold states and corporations accountable.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000046#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The authors warn against the \"corporate capture\" of the transparency mechanism by fossil fuel companies, suggesting that rules of engagement similar to the WHO's Framework for Engagement with Non-State Actors (FENSA) should be adopted to manage conflicts of interest.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000046#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The arrangement could be implemented as a stand-alone initiative or integrated into a broader international agreement, such as the \"proposed Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty\".","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000046#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["petroleum industry","Paris Agreement","climate finance","capacity building","fossil-fuel phase-out","transparency","just transition","Global stocktake","fossil fuel subsidy"],"geography_discussed":["Global South","United States","European Union"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy proposal"]},{"id":"fftreaty-000051","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/fftreaty-000051","title":"Why a truly Feminist Foreign Policy must confront the root cause of the climate crisis","publisher":{"name":"Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty Initiative","organization":"fossil-fuel-non-proliferation-treaty-initiative"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.fossilfueltreaty.org/s/Feminist-Foreign-Policy-Demands-a-Fossil-Fuel-Treaty-EN.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The statement asserts that a truly Feminist Foreign Policy (FFP) requires the phase-out of fossil fuels to dismantle exploitative power structures. It promotes the Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty as a justice-centered mechanism to complement the Paris Agreement by addressing fossil fuel supply. The document links the treaty to six FFP values: intersectionality, empathetic reflexivity, meaningful leadership, accountability, active peace commitment, and decolonial justice. It recommends that nations join the treaty discussions, participate in the First International Conference for the Phase-Out of Fossil Fuels in Colombia in April 2026, and implement the July 2025 International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion on climate harm.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000051#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty is presented as a binding legal instrument intended to complement the Paris Agreement by focusing on fossil fuel supply and accelerating the phase-out of oil, gas, and coal.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000051#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The document identifies a legal obligation for states to regulate fossil fuel production and subsidies following a July 2025 Advisory Opinion from the International Court of Justice regarding the prevention of significant climate harm.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000051#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Colombia is scheduled to host the First International Conference for the Phase-Out of Fossil Fuels in April 2026 to facilitate international cooperation and prepare for formal treaty negotiations.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000051#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The document argues that fossil fuel dependence is inextricably linked to structural violence and conflict, suggesting that cutting fossil fuels removes the \"life line\" of military activity.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000051#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A feminist approach to the energy transition requires Global North countries to lead the phase-out and finance loss and damage due to their historical responsibility for emissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"fftreaty-000051#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate justice","just transition","fossil-fuel phase-out","loss and damage","energy justice","Paris Agreement","human rights"],"geography_discussed":["Colombia","Global North","Global South"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy recommendation","advocacy"]},{"id":"foei-000038","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000038","title":"NO ES CERO: Cómo las metas de emisiones “cero neto” encubren la inacción frente al cambio climático","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"report","language":"es","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/es/publicaciones/no-es-cero-inaccion-cambio-climatico-informe/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"A technical report by a coalition of climate justice organizations arguing that \"net zero\" targets are used by governments and polluting corporations to mask inaction, avoid responsibility, and potentially increase fossil fuel emissions through the use of distant goals and unproven technologies.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000038#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The term \"net zero\" is utilized by major polluting companies and governments as a facade to avoid responsibility and hide inaction or harmful activities regarding climate change. The report asserts that \"net zero emissions\" is not equivalent to \"zero emissions.\"","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000038#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Net zero plans often rely on carbon removal technologies and tree plantations, such as Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), but the planet lacks sufficient land to support these projects at the scale proposed by governments and corporations. This reliance allows greenhouse gas emissions to continue increasing while waiting for future carbon removal.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000038#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The report characterizes many net zero targets as a form of \"carbon colonialism\" because they shift the burden of carbon capture to lands and plantations in the Global South, despite those regions contributing little to the climate crisis. Furthermore, targets set for distant dates, such as 2050, are described as insufficient and too late.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000038#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["net zero","carbon capture","beccs","carbon colonialism","climate justice"],"geography_discussed":["Global South"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy critique"]},{"id":"foei-000097","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000097","title":"En el décimo aniversario de Rana Plaza","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"statement","language":"es","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/es/video/decimo-aniversario-de-rana-plaza/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed"],"summary":{"text":"The statement marks the tenth anniversary of the 2013 Rana Plaza collapse in Bangladesh, which killed 1,138 people, 80% of whom were women. It argues that the disaster exemplifies the harm caused by transnational fast fashion companies pursuing profit at the expense of working-class, indigenous, and peasant women in the Global South. The author calls for binding norms to force companies to respect human rights and a shift toward an economic system that prioritizes people and life over profit.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000097#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The 2013 collapse of the Rana Plaza building in Bangladesh, which housed fast fashion textile workshops, resulted in 1,138 deaths, with women making up 80% of the casualties.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000097#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Rana Plaza disaster is cited as an example of the damage transnational companies cause in their pursuit of profit, particularly affecting working-class, indigenous, and peasant women in the Global South.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000097#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["human rights"],"geography_discussed":["Global South"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":[]},{"id":"foei-000245","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000245","title":"NOT ZERO: How ‘net zero’ targets disguise climate inaction","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"briefing","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/publication/not-zero-climate-inaction-briefing/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"A joint technical briefing by several climate justice organisations arguing that 'net zero' targets are used by governments and corporations to disguise climate inaction, greenwash business-as-usual, and shift the burden of carbon sequestration to the global South.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000245#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The term 'net zero' is employed by major polluting governments and corporations as a façade to avoid responsibility and mask inaction or harmful activities. These pledges often rely on distant targets that require no immediate action and depend on technologies that are unlikely to function at scale and may cause significant harm.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000245#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Current 'net zero' plans are physically unsustainable because there is insufficient land globally to support the combined requirements for offsets and Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) tree plantations. These targets allow greenhouse gas emissions to continue rising based on the hope that future technologies or plantations can remove carbon dioxide from the air.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000245#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The reliance on land and tree plantations in global South countries for carbon sequestration constitutes a form of 'carbon colonialism,' as these regions contributed little to the climate crisis. The briefing argues that targets such as 'Net zero by 2050' are insufficient and that plans should instead focus on 'Real Zero' through radical emissions reductions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000245#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["net zero","carbon sequestration","beccs","carbon colonialism","greenhouse gas emissions"],"geography_discussed":["global South"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy critique"]},{"id":"foei-000316","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000316","title":"The EU and the corporate impunity nexus","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/publication/the-eu-and-the-corporate-impunity-nexus/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","geography_discussed"],"summary":{"text":"This report argues that European transnational corporations frequently commit human rights and environmental violations globally while avoiding accountability, a process facilitated by EU trade, investment, and carbon permit policies that outsource negative impacts to the Global South.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000316#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"European transnational corporations are involved in environmental and human rights violations worldwide and generally avoid accountability, despite claims from European business leaders and politicians regarding their leadership in corporate responsibility.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000316#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"EU policies, specifically the focus on carbon permit trading and the pursuit of investment and trade agreements, facilitate or encourage a pattern where European multinationals outsource the most severe social and environmental impacts of their resource consumption to the Global South.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000316#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":[],"geography_discussed":["Europe","Global South"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":[]},{"id":"foei-000332","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000332","title":"ZERO PAS NET : Comment les objectifs à « zéro émission nette » dissimulent l’inaction politique","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"briefing","language":"fr","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/fr/publications/zero-pas-net-inaction-politique-climat-document/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"This technical briefing, produced by a coalition of climate justice organizations including Friends of the Earth International and Action Aid, argues that 'net zero' targets are used by governments and polluting companies to mask political inaction and justify continued fossil fuel extraction.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000332#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The term 'net zero emissions' is used by major polluters and governments as a smoke screen to hide inaction and harmful climate activities, allowing them to 'greenwash' their operations and continue polluting.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000332#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Net zero targets often rely on future technologies and forest plantations for carbon capture and storage (BECCS) that are physically impossible to implement at the required scale due to a lack of available land.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000332#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Many net zero goals operate as a form of 'carbon colonialism' by shifting carbon sequestration efforts to lands and forests in the Global South, despite these regions having minimal responsibility for the climate crisis.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000332#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The briefing asserts that targets such as 'net zero by 2050' are insufficient and too late, serving as a collective blank check to continue emitting greenhouse gases in the hope that future technologies can absorb CO2.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000332#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["net zero","carbon capture and storage","beccs","carbon colonialism","greenwashing"],"geography_discussed":["Global South"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["Policy Critique"]},{"id":"foei-000390","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000390","title":"COVAX, un órgano mundial de múltiples partes interesadas que puede acarrear riesgos sanitarios y políticos para los países en desarrollo y el multilateralismo","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"report","language":"es","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/es/publicaciones/covax-covid19-vacuna/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report criticizes COVAX as a commercial-style mechanism that prioritizes corporate interests and market stability over human rights and equitable vaccine distribution. It contends that the multi-stakeholder governance model used by COVAX obscures accountability, sidelines governments and the WHO, and risks allowing corporate interests to dictate global health decisions for the Global South.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000390#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"COVAX is characterized as a commercial-style entity that uses government capital to shape the vaccine manufacturing industry and consumer market in the Global South, operating without national medical approval or manufacturer accountability.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000390#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The multi-stakeholder governance structure of COVAX is intended to marginalize the World Health Organization (WHO) and avoid public accountability in global governance.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000390#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The report asserts that the primary motivation for creating COVAX was not to fight COVID-19 in the Global South, but to distribute vaccines without disrupting the global pharmaceutical market and by bypassing existing multilateral humanitarian emergency systems.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000390#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The multi-stakeholder regime is criticized for inserting corporate interests directly into global decision-making and lacking standards for responsibility or accountability, which complicates the identification of moral obligations despite the high stakes for millions of people.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000390#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":[],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy analysis","political critique"]},{"id":"foei-000399","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000399","title":"COVAX: A global multistakeholder group that poses political and health risks to developing countries and multilateralism","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/publication/covax-covid19-vaccine-report/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report criticizes COVAX as a multistakeholder initiative that functions more like a merchant bank than a humanitarian effort, arguing that it marginalizes the World Health Organization (WHO) and lacks public accountability. It contends that the mechanism is designed to protect the global pharmaceutical market and business interests rather than ensuring equitable, low-cost vaccine access for developing countries.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000399#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"COVAX is characterized as a multistakeholder group that functions similarly to a merchant bank, utilizing government capital to influence the global vaccine industry and the consumer market in the Global South, rather than prioritizing a human rights-based approach to vaccine distribution.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000399#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The operational structure of COVAX is designed to bypass traditional multilateral humanitarian relief systems and marginalize the World Health Organization (WHO) to avoid public accountability in global governance.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000399#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The multistakeholder model of governance used by COVAX is criticized for inserting business interests directly into global decision-making and obfuscating responsibility and liability, creating a risk that commercial self-interest will inappropriately influence vaccine decisions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000399#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["public health","human rights"],"geography_discussed":["Global South"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["political analysis","economic analysis"]},{"id":"foei-000998","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000998","title":"Agroecology vs ‘Nature Based Solutions’","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"fact sheet","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/FoEI-NBS-factsheet2.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The fact sheet contrasts agroecology with 'nature based solutions' (NBS), asserting that NBS serves as a tool for agribusinesses and the finance sector to commodify nature and carbon. It claims that NBS focuses on narrow carbon sequestration metrics and specific practices like no-till farming to preserve corporate control, whereas agroecology seeks systemic change, food sovereignty, and land redistribution. The document warns that NBS integrates nature into corporate profit chains and provides carbon credits that allow fossil fuel corporations to pursue 'net zero' instead of real zero emissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000998#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Corporate entities, including agribusinesses, fossil fuel corporations, and the finance industry, promote 'nature based solutions' (NBS) to maintain industrial farming models and create new income streams through financial speculation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000998#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"NBS is criticized for focusing on carbon reduction and a limited set of practices—such as cover cropping, fertiliser management, and no-till farming—which are compatible with corporate control and the use of pesticides and biotech products, rather than pursuing the systemic change associated with agroecology.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000998#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The document highlights a conflict between the history of NBS, which is linked to the displacement of local communities through 'protected areas', and the agroecological goals of agrarian reform and land redistribution, particularly in the global South.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000998#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The value of voluntary carbon markets increased fourfold between 2020 and 2021, partly due to the growth of NBS projects, which the document claims allows entities to prefer 'net zero' distractions over actual zero emissions targets.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000998#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["agroecology","nature-based solutions","carbon sequestration","Net-zero emissions","regenerative agriculture","natural capital"],"geography_discussed":["global South"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy analysis","critical review"]},{"id":"foei-001005","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-001005","title":"movilizar resistir transformar ‘Soluciones basadas en la naturaleza’","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"fact sheet","language":"es","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/FoEI-SBN-ficha2.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The fact sheet critiques the trend of presenting agroecology as a subset of 'nature-based solutions' (NbS), asserting that this framing serves the interests of fossil fuel companies, agribusiness, and the financial sector. It argues that while agroecology seeks systemic change and social justice, NbS focuses narrowly on carbon capture to create new financial assets and 'green' credentials for industrial actors. The document highlights the incompatibility between the emancipatory goals of agroecology and the market-driven approach of NbS, which it claims facilitates land displacement and the continuation of destructive business models.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-001005#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Corporate entities, including fossil fuel companies, agribusiness, and the World Economic Forum, are promoting 'nature-based solutions' (NbS) to co-opt agroecology and prioritize carbon capture over broader goals of environmental, social, and economic justice.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-001005#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The use of NbS allows the industrial agricultural sector to promote 'regenerative agriculture' through specific practices—such as no-till farming and digital technologies—that maintain corporate control and the use of pesticides and biotechnology rather than implementing systemic change.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-001005#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The financial sector and agribusiness view NbS as a means to generate new revenue streams and financial assets for speculation, contributing to a fourfold increase in the value of voluntary carbon markets between 2020 and 2021.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-001005#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is a fundamental conflict between NbS and agroecology: NbS is characterized as a tool for 'net zero' distractions and corporate profit that has historically led to community displacement, whereas agroecology advocates for land redistribution and a reduction in fossil fuel inputs.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-001005#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["nature-based solutions","agroecology","carbon capture and storage","regenerative agriculture","Net-zero emissions","climate finance"],"geography_discussed":["Global South"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["critical analysis","policy critique"]},{"id":"foei-001122","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-001122","title":"PRINCIPIOS DE ATI PARA UNA LA LEGISLACIÓN DE LA UE QUE REGULE EFECTIVAMENTE LA ACTIVIDAD DE LAS EMPRESAS A LO LARGO DE SUS CADENAS DE VALOR MUNDIALES","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"statement","language":"es","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Principios-de-ATI-para-una-legislación-de-la-UE-que-regule-efectivamente-la-actividad-de-las-empresas-a-lo-largo-de-sus-cadenas-de-valor-mundiales.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"Friends of the Earth International argues that the proposed EU corporate sustainability due diligence legislation must move beyond procedural requirements to establish substantive obligations and strict liability for companies. The document asserts that EU law should complement a legally binding UN instrument to end corporate impunity, ensuring that parent companies are held administratively, civilly, and criminally liable for damages caused by their subsidiaries and value chains globally. Key demands include the inversion of the burden of proof, the recognition of the right to free, prior and informed consent for affected communities, and the provision of effective legal remedies in EU courts for victims, including those in the Global South.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-001122#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The proposed EU directive on sustainable corporate governance should not be a substitute for, but rather a complement to, a legally binding UN instrument designed to close transnational gaps that enable corporate impunity.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-001122#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Due diligence must be treated as a substantive obligation to achieve results rather than a mere procedural 'tick-box' exercise, as procedural obligations alone are unlikely to prevent or repair violations.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-001122#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The legislation should establish strict liability for parent and outsourcing companies for damages caused by their subsidiaries and global value chains, including joint and several liability, and should not allow 'safe harbor' regimes to evade responsibility.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-001122#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"To improve access to justice in EU courts, the law should invert the burden of proof, requiring companies to prove they did not fail in their prevention duties or that they lack control over entities in their value chain.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-001122#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The framework must protect the rights of affected communities, specifically upholding the right to free, prior and informed consent under ILO Convention 169 and the right to reject projects.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-001122#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["human rights","climate impact","Free, Prior and Informed Consent"],"geography_discussed":["Global South"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy recommendation","legal analysis"]},{"id":"foei-001143","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-001143","title":"THE THREE COVID CRISES AND MULTISTAKEHOLDERISM","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Report_three-COVID-crises-and-multistakeholderism_Friends-of-the-Earth-International-and-Transnational-Institute_2022.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document argues that the 'COVID crisis' consists of three layers: a viral reality, a systemic crisis rooted in existing inequalities, and a 'power crisis' driven by the strategic responses of powerful actors. It contends that multistakeholderism (MSism)—exemplified by ACT-A and COVAX—serves as a tool for the Global North to maintain corporate profits and the rules of globalisation while bypassing the accountability of the UN system. The author identifies four responses by the powerful: expanding markets, protecting globalisation, a passive 'stand-back' approach that allows mass death in the Global South, and limited mitigation. The report concludes with recommendations to treat health as a global public good and return governance to multilateral frameworks.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-001143#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The author distinguishes between three types of COVID crises: the viral crisis (the biological spread), the systemic crisis (how the virus interacts with pre-existing social and economic inequalities), and the power crisis (the consequences of actions or inactions taken by powerful actors).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-001143#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Powerful actors have used the pandemic to expand the economic and political power of OECD governments and transnational corporations (TNCs), such as by demanding vaccine liability waivers from Global South governments as a condition for purchase.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-001143#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A primary goal for powerful actors has been to protect the rules of globalisation and intellectual property (IP) systems, resisting IP waivers for COVID technologies to prevent a precedent that could be applied to climate or hunger crises.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-001143#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The 'stand-back approach' is described as a passive strategy where Northern states protect pharmaceutical profits over saving lives in the Global South, which the author characterizes as a 'silent war' of inaction.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-001143#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Multistakeholderism (MSism) is presented as a governance tool that allows TNCs and powerful governments to exert power without the formal responsibility, obligations, or liabilities required of national states.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-001143#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Access to COVID-19 Tools Accelerator (ACT-A) and its pillars (diagnostics, therapeutics, vaccines, and health systems) are viewed as mechanisms that marginalise the UN system and prioritise market-based solutions over public health as a global good.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-001143#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"COVAX is critiqued for failing to meet its minimalist target of vaccinating 10% of the population in 92 target countries and for operating on the assumption that medical care must be purchased.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-001143#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The World Economic Forum's (WEF) COVID Action Platform is cited as an example of using the crisis to expand specific commercial markets, including fintech, digital services, and consumer wearables.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-001143#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The report highlights a severe disparity in vaccination rates, noting that 74% of people in high-income economies were fully vaccinated compared to 16% in the 28 lower-income economies.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-001143#insight-9","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate crisis"],"geography_discussed":["South Africa","India","Mexico","Brazil","Jordan","Nigeria","Pakistan","Zimbabwe"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy analysis","governance critique"]},{"id":"glorespar-000083","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/glorespar-000083","title":"Global Resilience Partnership Enabling Logic Model","publisher":{"name":"Global Resilience Partnership","organization":"global-resilience-partnership"},"document_type":"fact sheet","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.globalresiliencepartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/grp-enabling-logic-model.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Global Resilience Partnership (GRP) aims to support 15 million people and leverage $100 million for resilience initiatives by 2030. Its strategy focuses on transforming food and financial systems, scaling collaborations between formal and informal stakeholders, and embedding resilience within the private sector. Short-term targets for 2024-2027 include leveraging US$25 million, supporting five million people, and establishing 100 urban labs in informal settlements led by women's collectives.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glorespar-000083#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The Global Resilience Partnership has set a long-term impact goal for 2030 to support 15 million people and leverage $100 million in resilience initiatives and programmes.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glorespar-000083#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The organization's long-term outcomes for 2030 include transforming food and financial systems, scaling formal-informal collaborations, increasing transdisciplinary learning, and embedding resilience in the financial and private sectors.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glorespar-000083#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Specific programme indicator targets for 2027 include leveraging US$25 million, supporting five million people, and training 5,000 MBA students.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glorespar-000083#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The partnership aims to establish 100 urban labs in informal settlements that are led by women's collectives as part of its 2027 targets.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glorespar-000083#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Short-term outcomes for 2024-2027 focus on improving locally-led adaptation in the Global South, advancing knowledge on resilient food systems in vulnerable areas, and amplifying Global South expertise.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glorespar-000083#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate resilience","Community based adaptation","climate finance"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["strategic planning","logic model"]},{"id":"glorespar-000101","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/glorespar-000101","title":"Recommendations for inclusive virtual meetings","publisher":{"name":"Global Resilience Partnership","organization":"global-resilience-partnership"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.globalresiliencepartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/key-recommendations-from-survey-monkey-_-final-1.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Global Resilience Partnership conducted a survey of 88 stakeholders to identify barriers to virtual engagement for grassroots and community-based organisations (CBOs). The findings highlight four primary challenges: lack of access to stable internet and hardware, platform unfamiliarity, language and time zone barriers, and inequitable power dynamics in agenda-setting. To address these, the report recommends financing data and equipment, using consistent platforms like Zoom, offering staggered meeting times, and co-creating agendas with local partners. It also identifies key best practices for successful engagement, including timely preparatory materials, inclusive agendas, and interactive formats.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glorespar-000101#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The primary barriers to virtual engagement for partners in the Global South are lack of stable internet connectivity and a lack of physical hardware such as laptops and smartphones.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glorespar-000101#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"While various platforms are used, Zoom, Skype, GoToMeeting, and Microsoft Teams are the most familiar and easy to use. The report suggests that consistent use of a single platform is more important than the specific software chosen to avoid user frustration.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glorespar-000101#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Virtual meetings often exclude non-English speakers and those in different time zones because they are typically hosted in English, follow Europe-centric time zones, and adhere to Northern seasonal schedules.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glorespar-000101#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is a lack of equity in virtual engagement power dynamics, as agendas are frequently set by formal organisations based in the Global North rather than the grassroots organisations they engage.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glorespar-000101#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Successful virtual engagements depend on three main pillars: thorough preparation and follow-up, the co-creation of inclusive agendas with diverse stakeholders, and the use of interactive formats.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glorespar-000101#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate risk","nature-based solutions"],"geography_discussed":["Global North","Europe"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["survey analysis","policy recommendations"]}]}