{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"geography":["Uppsala"]},"warnings":[]},"total":{"value":3,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?geography=Uppsala","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"sei-002756","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/sei-002756","title":"Serious Game System – SELECT ECOTECH","publisher":{"name":"Stockholm Environment Institute","organization":"stockholm-environment-institute"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2020-02-14","source_url":"https://www.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/select-eco-tech.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document details the development of SELECT ECOTECH, a serious game system (SGS) designed as a learning platform for stakeholders in the Baltic Sea Region (BSR). The game aims to foster systemic awareness and adaptive capacity when selecting eco-technologies to reduce nutrient and carbon emissions while maximizing co-benefits. Co-designed with stakeholders from three case study catchments—Fyrisån (Sweden), Vantaanjoki (Finland), and Slupia (Poland)—the game uses a board game format to simulate 'wicked' situations, including system shocks and policy changes. The report outlines a three-phase participatory design process, the game's rules regarding baseline emissions and resource management, and the specific eco-technologies and developments integrated into the system. The findings suggest that the iterative, playful nature of the SGS allows stakeholders to cross knowledge boundaries and experiment with innovative technology constellations beyond technocratic solutions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002756#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"SELECT ECOTECH was developed through a participatory co-design process involving stakeholders from three specific river catchments: Fyrisån in Sweden, Vantaanjoki in Finland, and Slupia in Poland.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002756#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The serious game system is designed to help users navigate 'wicked' situations—characterized by high uncertainty, complexity, and controversy—by providing a safe space to explore the systemic impact of different eco-technology constellations.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002756#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The game's primary objectives for players are to reduce emissions from land use systems (urban, forestry, and agriculture), increase system productivity, and enhance adaptive capacity.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002756#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The game mechanics incorporate dynamic elements such as 'shock' cards and policy changes to simulate real-world uncertainties and the impact of the policy environment on eco-technology implementation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002756#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The co-development process revealed that the learning and knowledge co-production began at the start of the design phase and did not require a fully functional game to be effective.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002756#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["carbon sequestration","water management","adaptive capacity","land use","bioenergy"],"geography_discussed":["Finland","Poland","Vantaa River","Słupia","Uppsala","Helsinki","Słupsk"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["methodological description","process evaluation"]},{"id":"sei-002184","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/sei-002184","title":"Implications of new national policies on management of sewage sludge for a Swedish municipality","publisher":{"name":"Stockholm Environment Institute","organization":"stockholm-environment-institute"},"document_type":"policy brief","language":"en","date_published":"2020-02","source_url":"https://www.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/bonusreturn-policybrief2020-sweden-eng.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document examines two policy options recommended by a 2018 Swedish Government inquiry: a total ban on sewage sludge reuse or a limited ban allowing application only if strict quality standards are met. It highlights that while both aim to reduce environmental risks and improve phosphorus recycling, a total ban would render existing investments in certification programs like REVAQ obsolete and necessitate costly transitions to incineration and ash-based phosphorus recovery. Using Uppsala as an example, the brief argues that a limited ban is preferable as it protects upstream pollution reduction efforts and preserves the value of organic matter in sludge.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002184#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"A 2018 Swedish Government inquiry proposed two policy alternatives for sewage sludge management: a complete ban on all agricultural and other reuse options, or a limited ban that allows farmland spreading only if strict quality standards are met, while still prohibiting landscaping or landfill capping.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002184#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A total ban on agricultural reuse would likely force municipalities to adopt incineration and recover phosphorus from ash, a transition that requires significant investment and coordination. The document notes that Germany expects a similar transition to take 12 years, despite already having more incineration infrastructure in place.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002184#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"For frontrunner municipalities like Uppsala, which increased sludge spreading to 65% in 2018 with a target of 80% by 2020, a total ban would result in stranded investments in the REVAQ certification programme and supply chains.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002184#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The authors recommend the second policy option (limited ban) because it preserves the value of organic matter for soil improvement, which is lost during incineration, and protects existing 'upstream' work to reduce pollution at the source.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002184#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["circular economy","wastewater treatment","biogas","incineration"],"geography_discussed":["Germany","Finland","Poland"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy analysis","case study"]},{"id":"sei-001256","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/sei-001256","title":"Final water governance learning workshop Sassari, Italy 14-16 October 2015","publisher":{"name":"Stockholm Environment Institute","organization":"stockholm-environment-institute"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2015","source_url":"https://www.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/cadwago-final-learning-event-report.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The CADWAGO final workshop in Sassari, Italy, brought together 35 researchers and practitioners to discuss systemic water governance and climate adaptation. The event featured project findings on governance praxis and co-learning, external perspectives on catchment management in the UK and disaster management in Australia, and a field visit to Arborea, Sardinia. A central highlight was 'La Rasgioni' (the water court), a traditional conflict resolution process used to facilitate dialogue between dairy farmers and institutional authorities regarding nitrate pollution. Participants concluded that effective water governance requires moving beyond traditional stakeholder participation toward conscious co-learning and systemic designs that reconcile conflicting interests.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001256#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The CADWAGO project identifies four primary lenses for understanding water governance: the framing of water dilemmas, institutional norms and structures, governance praxis, and governance learning.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001256#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Research on flooding indicates a general preference for multisectoral leadership involving governments, industries, and non-governmental organisations, though individuals not directly affected by floods often overestimate their region's resilience.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001256#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Traditional governance is viewed as ill-suited for complex, ill-defined problems like climate change and food security because it lacks the adaptive capacity to handle changing conditions and contested knowledge.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001256#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The 'Robbing Peter to Pay Paul' idiom is used to analyze how pre-existing norms and power imbalances distort water governance, sometimes leading to the bypassing of official power holders or the exportation of negative side effects to other sectors or countries.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001256#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"In the UK, the 'Catchment Based Approach' piloted since 2011 emphasizes the need for a systemic perspective to integrate biophysical complexities with social, economic, and cultural frameworks, overcoming institutional silos.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001256#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The 'La Rasgioni' (water court) event in Arborea, Sardinia, demonstrated that traditional, informal conflict resolution can create spaces for dialogue between producers and institutions, though it also revealed gaps in representation, specifically the absence of women and fishermen in formal decision-making roles.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001256#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Analysis of the Arborea case study suggests that while the normative system for water governance is consistent with regulations, there is a critical need for better coordination between producers and institutions to improve competitiveness while respecting environmental rules.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001256#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["water-management","climate change adaptation","flood management","water security","ecosystem service"],"geography_discussed":["United Kingdom","Australia","Queensland","Sweden","Uppsala","West Kalimantan","Indonesia"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["workshop report","case study analysis","qualitative synthesis"]}]}