{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"geography":["United Nations"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'United Nations' for facet 'geography' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":5,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?geography=United+Nations","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"wacc-000183","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/wacc-000183","title":"WACC Strategic Plan","publisher":{"name":"World Association for Christian Communication","organization":"world-association-for-christian-communication"},"document_type":"report","language":"fr","date_published":"2022","source_url":"https://waccglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/SP2022-26-draft12.7.2021.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The WACC Strategic Plan 2022-2026 establishes a framework to promote communication rights as inherent to all human rights. The organization identifies five priority programme areas: digital communication rights, migrants and refugees, Indigenous rights, climate change, and gender equality. WACC emphasizes 'effective access'—which integrates technology with literacy and education—to combat the digital divide and the influence of 'surveillance capitalism'. The plan also details organizational goals for financial sustainability, network expansion, and increased visibility within international bodies like the United Nations.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wacc-000183#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"WACC defines communication rights as essential to democracy and human dignity, asserting that these rights are \"inherent in all other human rights\" and necessary for \"transparent, informed and democratic debate\".","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wacc-000183#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The organization identifies a critical need to move beyond simple internet access toward \"effective access\", which requires the interrelationship of media with \"literacy, language, and education\".","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wacc-000183#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"WACC highlights systemic inequalities in the digital sphere, noting that over 50% of the world's population lacks internet access and that the current model of \"surveillance capitalism\" allows major media companies to operate \"outside of the realm of public accountability\".","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wacc-000183#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The strategic plan prioritizes digital communication rights by promoting digital media literacy for marginalized groups, supporting \"community-managed telecommunication initiatives (\"community networks\")\", and encouraging open-source software.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wacc-000183#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Regarding forced migration, WACC aims to counter xenophobia and \"dominant narratives about migration\" by establishing networks of citizen journalists composed of migrants and host communities.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wacc-000183#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"For Indigenous peoples, WACC focuses on the right to access community media, specifically \"community radio\", as a means to realize the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wacc-000183#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"WACC links communication rights to the climate crisis, arguing that marginalized communities must be enabled to \"tell their own stories, organize for change, and advance their own solutions\" to combat disproportionate climate impacts.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wacc-000183#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Global Media Monitoring Project (GMMP) is a central initiative used to provide evidence that women's communication rights are \"ignored, denied or diminished\", serving as a tool for international advocacy for gender equality.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wacc-000183#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The organization's operational goals for 2022-2026 include diversifying revenue sources to achieve financial sustainability and increasing its representation in international forums, specifically the \"United Nations\".","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wacc-000183#insight-9","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["digital divide","indigenous rights","climate change","gender equality","human rights"],"geography_discussed":["United Nations"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["strategic plan"]},{"id":"costratri-000081","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/costratri-000081","title":"The Responsibility to Prepare and Prevent (R2P2): A Climate Security Governance Framework for the 21st Century","publisher":{"name":"The Council on Strategic Risks","organization":"the-council-on-strategic-risks"},"document_type":"executive summary","language":"en","date_published":"2019-11-06","source_url":"https://councilonstrategicrisks.org/2019/11/06/report-the-responsibility-to-prepare-and-prevent-a-new-climate-security-governance-framework/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report argues that current global governance structures are inadequate for the security risks posed by climate change despite advanced predictive capabilities. It identifies three primary gaps: a lack of standardized global information, a disconnect between climate messengers and security audiences, and a lack of coordination between climate and security policy. To resolve these, the authors propose the R2P2 framework, which includes the creation of an International Climate Security Assessment Panel (ICSAP), the appointment of a UN Permanent Representative for Climate and Security to lead a Climate Security Center (CSC), and the establishment of a UN-level Climate Security Coordination Mechanism (CSCM).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"costratri-000081#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The authors identify three critical gaps in the international governance of climate security risks: the absence of a standardized global information hub and accepted future projections; a disconnect between climate change messengers and the security audiences required for action; and a lack of global governance mechanisms to align international climate policy with security actions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"costratri-000081#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"To address the information gap, the report proposes the 'Assessment & Anticipation' principle, which involves creating standardized and credible global climate security assessments. This would be implemented through the establishment of an International Climate Security Assessment Panel (ICSAP) responsible for regular reporting.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"costratri-000081#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"To bridge the gap between climate information and security decision-makers, the report suggests the 'Elevation & Translation' principle. This involves appointing a UN Permanent Representative for Climate and Security to lead a new Climate Security Center (CSC) and provide recommendations for international action.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"costratri-000081#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The report proposes a 'Coordination & Alignment' principle to synchronize international climate and security policy windows. The recommended mechanism for this is the creation of an intergovernmental 'Climate Security Coordination Mechanism (CSCM)' at the UN level.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"costratri-000081#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate governance"],"geography_discussed":["United Nations"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy proposal","governance framework"]},{"id":"natjust-000066","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/natjust-000066","title":"e-learning module on the United Nations Human Rights System","publisher":{"name":"Natural Justice","organization":"natural-justice"},"document_type":"guide","language":"en","date_published":"2015-09-28","source_url":"https://naturaljustice.org/publication/e-learning-module-on-the-united-nations-human-rights-system/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights"],"summary":{"text":"This e-learning module provides an introduction to the United Nations human rights system, focusing on its general structure and its specific application to Indigenous peoples and local communities.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"natjust-000066#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The module serves as an introductory guide to the UN human rights system, covering the general UN system and its relationship to local communities and Indigenous peoples, while providing context for a separate module on the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"natjust-000066#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The content explores the history of the international human rights system, specifically the 'International Bill of Rights' and other primary treaties, as well as the mechanisms and bodies that support these treaties.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"natjust-000066#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The module distinguishes between human rights mechanisms that are available to any individual suffering an abuse and those specifically reserved for Indigenous peoples.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"natjust-000066#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":[],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":[]},{"id":"foei-000095","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000095","title":"Exposing corporate capture of the UN Food Systems Summit through multistakeholderism","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/publication/corporate-capture-un-food-systems-summit-multistakeholderism/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"This report by Friends of the Earth International examines how the UN Food Systems Summit (UNFSS) facilitates 'corporate capture' by shifting from state-led multilateralism to a multistakeholder governance model.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000095#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The UN Food Systems Summit (UNFSS) represents a shift from multilateralism, where States lead decision-making, to multistakeholderism, which incorporates corporations, business associations, donors, academics, and civil society into the formulation and implementation of responses to food system problems.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000095#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Multistakeholderism enables transnational corporations and their associated platforms and associations to influence national and international governance, financing, and policy-making, while advocating for 'false solutions' to food system crises that favor corporate interests.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000095#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["food systems","governance","corporate influence"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy analysis"]},{"id":"foei-000343","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000343","title":"Cómo el enfoque de múltiples partes interesadas ayuda al agronegocio a controlar la Cumbre de la ONU sobre los Sistemas Alimentarios","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"report","language":"es","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/es/publicaciones/multiples-partes-interesadas-agronegocio-la-cumbre-onu-sistemas-alimentarios/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"This report critiques the UN Food Systems Summit for replacing state-led multilateralism with a multi-stakeholder approach, which the authors argue enables transnational corporations to dominate food systems governance and promote corporate-friendly solutions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000343#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The UN Food Systems Summit represents a shift from multilateralism, where decision-making is led by States, toward a multi-stakeholder approach. This new governance practice incorporates corporations, corporate platforms, business associations, donors, academics, and civil society agents into dialogue, decision-making, and the implementation of responses to shared problems.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000343#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The transition from multilateralism to a multi-stakeholder approach within the United Nations system allows powerful transnational corporations and their associations to influence national and international policy, funding, narratives, and governance. This shift is used to promote corporate-friendly 'false solutions' for food systems in crisis.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000343#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["food systems","governance","corporate influence"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["summary"]}]}