{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"geography":["Schengen Area"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'Schengen Area' for facet 'geography' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":1,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?geography=Schengen+Area","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"prio-001505","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/prio-001505","title":"‘Just’ Research","publisher":{"name":"Peace Research Institute Oslo","organization":"peace-research-institute-oslo"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/57195d7c-575a-46d5-903e-098d14072765/Just Research A Case Study of EU-funded Research with Experimental Artificial Intelligence Technology for Border Control.pdf?inline=true","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document examines the iBorderCtrl project, an EU-funded initiative that developed an AI-based 'lie detector' (ADDS) to identify deceitful third-country nationals at Schengen borders. The author argues that the project is not 'just research' but is driven by the securitisation of migrants, who are framed as security threats to justify the use of high-risk, experimental technology. The thesis finds that the project operated in a weakly regulated legal space where fundamental rights were treated as barriers rather than guiding principles. It further contends that migrants are treated as 'rights-optional' test subjects due to power imbalances and a lack of thorough ethical assessments, which the author describes as a 'rushed process'.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001505#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The iBorderCtrl project was justified by the EU through the perceived need to manage migration, combat terrorism, and maintain a leading position in AI innovation, reflecting a 'securitised' view of migrants as threats.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001505#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Automated Deception Detection System (ADDS) is based on scientifically contested assumptions that micro-expressions are universal indicators of deceit, leading critics to label it 'pseudo-scientific'.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001505#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The EU's proposed AI Act categorizes emotion detection and polygraphs used in migration and border management as 'high-risk AI systems', yet it does not explicitly prohibit them, which may indirectly legitimize their use.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001505#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is a systemic trend where third-country nationals and migrants are treated as viable test subjects for experimental technologies because they lack the same legal protections as EU citizens.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001505#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The ethical assessment process for iBorderCtrl was inadequate and rushed, contradicting the belief of some EU agencies that it was thoroughly conducted.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001505#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The project promotes 'digital externalisation' by moving border control processes to the traveler's home via automated interviews, potentially increasing the difficulty for asylum seekers to access the EU.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001505#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The use of machine learning in ADDS creates a 'black box' effect, making the reasoning behind automated decisions opaque and hindering the ability of travelers to seek redress.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001505#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["human rights"],"geography_discussed":["Hungary","Greece","Latvia"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["case study","legal analysis","ethical analysis","qualitative research"]}]}