{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"geography":["Słupia"]},"warnings":[]},"total":{"value":6,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?geography=S%C5%82upia","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"sei-002182","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/sei-002182","title":"Decision support toolbox","publisher":{"name":"Stockholm Environment Institute","organization":"stockholm-environment-institute"},"document_type":"guide","language":"en","date_published":"2020-03-31","source_url":"https://www.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/bonus-return-decision-support-toolbox-d5.2.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The BONUS RETURN decision-support toolbox offers 16 tools to help decision-makers transition to a circular economy by adopting eco-technologies for nutrient and carbon recovery. It covers the entire innovation lifecycle, from identifying criteria through social innovation and multi-criteria analysis to promoting existing technologies via sustainable and circular public procurement. The guide also details methods for supporting pre-commercial innovation, such as innovation competitions, market surveys, independent comparative analyses, and testbed trials. It concludes by framing these tools within a Technological Innovation Systems (TIS) approach to create long-term strategic incentives and co-benefits for the Baltic Sea Region.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002182#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The transition to a circular economy requires shifting mindsets regarding waste and by-products through dialogue between decision-makers and the public to enable the recovery of resources from wastewater and agricultural streams.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002182#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Social innovation is essential for creating solutions that are economically feasible for providers, provide suitable properties for buyers, and are socio-culturally accepted by consumers.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002182#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Multi-criteria analysis (MCA) allows for the transparent assessment of eco-technologies across five sustainability dimensions: environmental, economic, socio-cultural, technical function, and health and hygiene.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002182#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The project developed a Readiness Level (RL) framework, ranging from RL 1 to RL 9, to help buyers identify whether to use ordinary procurement (for RL 9) or innovation procurement (for RL 8 and below).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002182#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Public procurement is a significant driver for the circular economy, with the potential to pull high-sustainability and circular performance products into the market by moving beyond a focus on the lowest cost.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002182#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Innovation procurement includes Pre-Commercial Procurement (PCP) for early-stage research and development, and Public Procurement of Innovation (PPI) for market-ready solutions (RL 8) that need a first public customer.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002182#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"An innovation competition was used to identify and support emerging eco-technologies, resulting in three winners: RAVITA (developed by HSY), TerraNova® Ultra (developed by TerraNova Energy), and BiOPhree® (developed by Aquacare).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002182#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Market surveys for the RAVITA process indicated that while there is interest in phosphorus recovery, implementation is dependent on regulations such as mandatory phosphorus recovery or a ban on sewage sludge spreading.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002182#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Independent comparative analysis of TerraNova® Ultra against sewage sludge mono-incineration showed that TerraNova® Ultra produced fewer waste streams and had a less complicated treatment scheme, though mono-incineration had a better energy balance and higher phosphorus recovery rate (95% vs 80%).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002182#insight-9","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Testbed trials for BiOPhree® at the Knivsta WWTP validated that the technology could achieve less than 10 µg TP/l in treated effluent, but revealed that routine maintenance needs were higher than the developer's technical documentation stated.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002182#insight-10","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Technological Innovation Systems (TIS) approach helps identify structural barriers and drivers by analyzing actors, institutions, networks, and technological factors to create long-term strategic collaboration.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002182#insight-11","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Conceptualizing co-benefits—where a single policy measure addresses multiple goals—can open 'windows of opportunity' to advance environmental goals as side effects of higher-priority political agendas.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002182#insight-12","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["circular economy","wastewater treatment","agriculture","resource efficiency"],"geography_discussed":["Finland","Sweden","Poland","Vantaa River","Słupia","Fyris","Germany","Denmark","Netherlands","Helsinki","Düsseldorf","'s-Hertogenbosch","Knivsta"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["guide","framework","case study"]},{"id":"sei-001961","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/sei-001961","title":"Free access to functioning SWAT application of the three river basins","publisher":{"name":"Stockholm Environment Institute","organization":"stockholm-environment-institute"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2020-02-29","source_url":"https://www.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/swat-application-of-the-three-river-basins-1.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The BONUS RETURN project has released three baseline SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) model applications for the Vantaanjoki (Finland), Fyrisån (Sweden), and Słupia (Poland) river basins. These models, which have undergone calibration and validation, are hosted in the Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE) open data repository to allow researchers and practitioners to utilize existing parameterizations or develop new scenarios for these and similar target areas.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001961#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The BONUS RETURN project developed three baseline SWAT applications for specific case study catchments: Vantaanjoki in Finland, Fyrisån in Sweden, and Slupia in Poland.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001961#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The SWAT model applications are designed to help other modelers by providing ready-made parameterizations for areas similar to the case studies, reducing the laborious process of building a model from scratch.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001961#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The three model applications have been compressed into zip-files and made available through the Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE) open data repository.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001961#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Vantaanjoki catchment in Finland covers 1,688 km2 and utilized data from sources including the National Land Survey of Finland (MML), the Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI), and the Finnish Geological Survey (GTK).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001961#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Fyrisån catchment in Sweden covers 2,005 km2 and incorporated data from Lantmäteriet, the Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI), and the Swedish Board of Agriculture (SBoA).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001961#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Słupia catchment in Poland covers 1,621 km2 and used data from the Centre for Geodetic and Cartographic Data (CODGIK), the Institute of Meteorology and Water Management (IMGW), and the Regional Water Management Authority (RZGW).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001961#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["water management","bioenergy"],"geography_discussed":["Finland","Sweden","Poland","Vantaa River","Fyris","Słupia"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["technical documentation","data repository guide"]},{"id":"sei-002756","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/sei-002756","title":"Serious Game System – SELECT ECOTECH","publisher":{"name":"Stockholm Environment Institute","organization":"stockholm-environment-institute"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2020-02-14","source_url":"https://www.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/select-eco-tech.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document details the development of SELECT ECOTECH, a serious game system (SGS) designed as a learning platform for stakeholders in the Baltic Sea Region (BSR). The game aims to foster systemic awareness and adaptive capacity when selecting eco-technologies to reduce nutrient and carbon emissions while maximizing co-benefits. Co-designed with stakeholders from three case study catchments—Fyrisån (Sweden), Vantaanjoki (Finland), and Slupia (Poland)—the game uses a board game format to simulate 'wicked' situations, including system shocks and policy changes. The report outlines a three-phase participatory design process, the game's rules regarding baseline emissions and resource management, and the specific eco-technologies and developments integrated into the system. The findings suggest that the iterative, playful nature of the SGS allows stakeholders to cross knowledge boundaries and experiment with innovative technology constellations beyond technocratic solutions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002756#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"SELECT ECOTECH was developed through a participatory co-design process involving stakeholders from three specific river catchments: Fyrisån in Sweden, Vantaanjoki in Finland, and Slupia in Poland.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002756#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The serious game system is designed to help users navigate 'wicked' situations—characterized by high uncertainty, complexity, and controversy—by providing a safe space to explore the systemic impact of different eco-technology constellations.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002756#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The game's primary objectives for players are to reduce emissions from land use systems (urban, forestry, and agriculture), increase system productivity, and enhance adaptive capacity.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002756#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The game mechanics incorporate dynamic elements such as 'shock' cards and policy changes to simulate real-world uncertainties and the impact of the policy environment on eco-technology implementation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002756#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The co-development process revealed that the learning and knowledge co-production began at the start of the design phase and did not require a fully functional game to be effective.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002756#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["carbon sequestration","water management","adaptive capacity","land use","bioenergy"],"geography_discussed":["Finland","Poland","Vantaa River","Słupia","Uppsala","Helsinki","Słupsk"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["methodological description","process evaluation"]},{"id":"sei-001227","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/sei-001227","title":"CBA analysis of selected eco-technologies in the BSR","publisher":{"name":"Stockholm Environment Institute","organization":"stockholm-environment-institute"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2019-12-31","source_url":"https://www.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/assesment-of-costs-and-benefits.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report evaluates the economic viability of various eco-technologies in the Fyrisån (Sweden), Słupia (Poland), and Vantaanjoki (Finland) river basins using a combined Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) and Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) approach. It finds that most technologies currently yield a negative net present value (NPV) due to high investment costs, with the notable exceptions of anaerobic digestion and thermal treatment in the Vantaanjoki basin.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001227#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The study concludes that most evaluated eco-technologies are not currently economically viable, as only a few provide a positive net present value (NPV) at the current stage of the project.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001227#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"In the Vantaanjoki catchment area in Finland, anaerobic digestion is identified as the most promising alternative with an NPV of 67 million EUR, followed by thermal treatment with an NPV of 12 million EUR.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001227#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The analysis utilized a combined methodology where Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) results were incorporated into a Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) to provide decision-makers with an initial ranking of eco-technologies linked to Baltic Sea policy goals.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001227#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"While alternative scenarios provided additional market benefits (such as biogas and fertilizers) and non-market benefits (such as GHG emission mitigation and eutrophication reduction), these were generally insufficient to offset the required capital and operational expenditures.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001227#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["wastewater treatment","biogas","biochar","circular economy"],"geography_discussed":["Sweden","Poland","Finland","Fyris","Słupia","Vantaa River"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["cost-benefit analysis","multi-criteria analysis"]},{"id":"sei-001545","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/sei-001545","title":"Report from the multi-criteria analysis from workshop 2 with comparisons of the different alternatives in each case study and selection of eco-technologies for further use in WP5","publisher":{"name":"Stockholm Environment Institute","organization":"stockholm-environment-institute"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2019-04-15","source_url":"https://www.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/report-from-the-multicriteria-analysis.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report evaluates different systems for nutrient and carbon recovery in the Vantaanjoki (Finland), Fyrisån (Sweden), and Słupia (Poland) catchment areas. Using a multi-criteria analysis (MCA) involving stakeholder weighting, the study compares baseline management against alternatives such as anaerobic digestion, pyrolysis, and source-separation. In Vantaanjoki, anaerobic digestion scored highest. In Fyrisån, source-separation was the most sustainable. In Słupia, nutrient extraction performed best, while source-separation was found to be potentially less sustainable than the baseline due to local context and low adoption rates.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001545#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"In the Vantaanjoki case study, the anaerobic digestion system alternative achieved the highest sustainability score, followed closely by the Pyrolysis + urea hygienization system; both outperformed the composting baseline.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001545#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"For the Fyrisån case study, the source-separation system was the most sustainable, followed by nutrient extraction and incineration, with all recovery systems scoring higher than the baseline.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001545#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"In the Słupia case study, the nutrient extraction system received a considerably higher score than other alternatives, while the source-separation system scored the lowest and could potentially be less sustainable than the baseline.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001545#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The divergent results for source-separation between the Fyrisån and Słupia cases, despite using similar technologies, highlight the critical role of local context and stakeholder participation in sustainability assessments.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001545#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Anaerobic digestion in Vantaanjoki was found to be economically superior to composting, generating a projected yearly profit of 1 MEuro compared to an annual cost of 3 MEuro for composting.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001545#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Pyrolysis in the Vantaanjoki case was identified as having the highest annual cost at 8 MEuro, though this may be an overestimation due to the use of data from smaller plants.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001545#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"In the Fyrisån case, the nutrient extraction system (Alt 2F) demonstrated the best performance for global warming potential, eutrophication potential, and nutrient recovery.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001545#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Słupia case study revealed that a low fraction of source-separation (14%) is not a relevant choice as it provides small nutrient recovery benefits while increasing costs by approximately 30%.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001545#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["biochar","global warming potential","carbon sequestration","biogas","wastewater treatment"],"geography_discussed":["Finland","Sweden","Poland","Baltic region"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["multi-criteria analysis","sustainability assessment","cost-benefit analysis","substance flow analysis"]},{"id":"sei-002208","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/sei-002208","title":"Historical Review Report","publisher":{"name":"Stockholm Environment Institute","organization":"stockholm-environment-institute"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2018-06-27","source_url":"https://www.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/circularity-from-concept-to-practice.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report examines the transition from linear to circular resource use in wastewater management, focusing on the socio-cultural barriers to recycling sewage sludge as fertilizer. It analyzes historical practices in the EU and provides detailed case studies from three river basins in Sweden, Poland, and Finland, highlighting how perceptions of risk and regulatory gaps hinder the adoption of eco-technologies.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002208#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The transition to a circular economy is hindered by deeply engrained linear resource utilization models, including tax structures that burden human labor while remaining lenient toward the use of finite resources.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002208#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Sewage sludge application on farmland is the most common disposal method in the EU-27, used for almost half of all volumes, while incineration accounts for slightly less than 25%.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002208#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"EU sewage sludge management is fragmented due to the outdated 'Sludge Directive' (86/278/EEC), which has not been revised in over 30 years and only limits heavy metals, ignoring modern concerns like pharmaceuticals and microplastics.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002208#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"In Sweden, the Revaq certification program launched in 2008 aims to limit contaminants in wastewater to enable sludge use on farms, but it has not fully resolved the issue as some grain mills still reject sludge-fertilized crops due to fear of consumer backlash.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002208#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Słupsk wastewater treatment plant in Poland successfully produces a certified organic fertilizer called 'BIOTOP' through composting, which is in high demand by large farms (75% of production) and is an alternative to the national trend toward incineration.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002208#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"In Finland, the Helsinki Region Environmental Services Authority (HSY) produces 'Metsäpirtin multa', a sludge-based fertilizer mixed with peat and sold for lawns and gardens, as agricultural use was largely abandoned following opposition from farmers' organizations in the 1980s and 1990s.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002208#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Technical recovery of nutrients from sewage sludge is complicated by the 'blending and mixing' of wastewater, where desired substances like phosphorus and nitrogen are intermingled with pharmaceuticals, industrial effluents, and street runoff.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002208#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is a recurring pattern where new contaminants are identified just as previous ones are mitigated; for example, after heavy metals were reduced, flame retardants (PFAS), pharmaceuticals, and microplastics emerged as new risk factors.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002208#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["circular economy","wastewater treatment","bioenergy"],"geography_discussed":["European Union","Sweden","Poland","Finland","Fyris","Słupia","Vantaa River"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["historical review","case study","socio-cultural analysis"]}]}