{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"geography":["Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States' for facet 'geography' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":2,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?geography=Organisation+of+Eastern+Caribbean+States","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"geconco-000067","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/geconco-000067","title":"EASTERN CARIBBEAN GREEN ECONOMY BAROMETER 2018","publisher":{"name":"Green Economy Coalition","organization":"green-economy-coalition"},"document_type":"briefing","language":"en","date_published":"2018","source_url":"https://www.greeneconomycoalition.org/assets/reports/Barometers-2018/East-Caribbean-GE-Barometer-2018-WEB.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The 2018 Eastern Caribbean Green Economy Barometer evaluates the transition to a green economy (GE) in the OECS, concluding that progress is \"below average.\" While member governments generally acknowledge the GE concept, the report finds that definitions remain narrow, often lacking focus on equity and inclusion. Key barriers include a lack of structured fiscal policies, the absence of finance ministries in GE dialogues, and a failure to integrate natural capital valuation into national policies. Despite these gaps, the report identifies \"green shoots\" such as renewable energy commitments in Dominica, Antigua and Barbuda, and Saint Lucia, as well as the Caribbean Regional Oceanscape Project (CROP).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"geconco-000067#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The overall progress of the transition to a green and fair economy in the Eastern Caribbean is rated as below average, characterized by narrow definitions of GE that typically ignore equity and inclusion.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"geconco-000067#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is a significant lack of natural capital valuation and a dearth of policies that value ecological systems and biodiversity across the OECS.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"geconco-000067#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Progress in greening priority economic sectors is uneven; while there are renewable energy investments, the region still relies disproportionately on fossil fuels.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"geconco-000067#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Specific renewable energy targets have been set by some members: Dominica and Antigua and Barbuda aim for over 50% renewable power in 5-10 years, and Saint Lucia committed to a 35% threshold by 2020.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"geconco-000067#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The green finance landscape in the OECS is disjointed, lacking structured fiscal policies to support the GE transition and suffering from low public awareness.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"geconco-000067#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A critical gap in GE governance is the absence of Ministries of Finance and Planning from the transition dialogue, which limits the mainstreaming of GE into national economic planning.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"geconco-000067#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is very little evidence of a socially inclusive approach to the GE transition, with few public stances or efforts to promote equality and access to green jobs.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"geconco-000067#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["green economy","renewable energy","blue economy","climate resilience","sustainable finance","Low carbon development","waste management","ecotourism","sustainable agriculture","climate change","social inclusion","geothermal energy"],"geography_discussed":["Antigua and Barbuda","Dominica","Grenada","Saint Kitts and Nevis","Saint Lucia","Saint Vincent and the Grenadines","Anguilla","British Virgin Islands","Martinique","Montserrat"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy assessment","regional barometer"]},{"id":"sei-001601","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/sei-001601","title":"Climate finance to the Small Islands of the Eastern Caribbean: An overview of financial support provided from 2010 to 2015","publisher":{"name":"Stockholm Environment Institute","organization":"stockholm-environment-institute"},"document_type":"policy brief","language":"en","date_published":"2017","source_url":"https://www.sei.org/mediamanager/documents/Publications/SEI-2017-PB-caribbean-finance-atteridge.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document analyzes climate finance commitments to OECS Member States between 2010 and 2015, finding that while US$ 101 million was committed, actual disbursement rates were extremely low (under 10% for most countries). The funding was dominated by multilateral sources and focused heavily on disaster-related adaptation, primarily delivered through short-term projects.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001601#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Between 2010 and 2015, total climate finance commitments to OECS Member States reached US$ 101 million, which accounted for approximately 9% of the total official development aid provided to these nations. The majority of these funds began flowing after 2013, with the largest shares going to Dominica, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Grenada, and Antigua and Barbuda.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001601#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Climate finance for the OECS was heavily skewed toward adaptation, representing about 73% of the total, while mitigation accounted for 20% and 7% addressed both. The most funded sectors were disaster risk reduction and disaster response, followed by energy policy and renewable energy.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001601#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Multilateral climate funds provided approximately 70% of the total climate finance to OECS countries, a pattern that differs from Pacific SIDS and the wider Caribbean SIDS region, where bilateral sources were more dominant. The World Bank’s Climate Investment Funds were the largest single source, providing over half of the total finance.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001601#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The delivery of climate finance was primarily through grants (68%) and short-term projects, with only 32% coming as concessional loans. A significant portion of the funding consisted of very small project budgets, with 17 of 34 recorded allocations being less than US$ 1 million.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001601#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is a severe gap between committed funds and actual spending; disbursement rates for Dominica, Saint Lucia, Antigua and Barbuda, and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines were all below 10%. This suggests significant challenges in the programming and execution of climate projects compared to non-climate aid.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001601#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate finance","climate change adaptation","climate change mitigation","disaster risk reduction","renewable energy","energy policy","Small Island Developing States"],"geography_discussed":["Caribbean","Pacific Ocean"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["financial analysis","policy review"]}]}