{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"geography":["Kutai Kartanegara"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'Kutai Kartanegara' for facet 'geography' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":2,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?geography=Kutai+Kartanegara","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"trendas-000128","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/trendas-000128","title":"#BersihkanIndonesia","publisher":{"name":"Trend Asia","organization":"trend-asia"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://trendasia.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/FA-IKN-REPORT-INGGRIS-digital2.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report critiques the Indonesian government's plan to move its capital to East Kalimantan, specifically in the Penajam Paser Utara and Kutai Kartanegara regencies. It argues that the project is a 'political commodity' designed to benefit oligarchs and corporations who hold extensive mining, forestry, and plantation concessions in the area. The document highlights significant environmental threats, including the destruction of mangrove ecosystems in Balikpapan Bay, the risk of floods, and continued reliance on coal power. It also warns of the marginalization and potential eviction of indigenous peoples, such as the Balik tribe, and criticizes the lack of transparency in financing and public participation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"trendas-000128#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The new capital city area (IKN) is divided into three zones: a 5,644-hectare central core (ring one), a 42,000-hectare national capital area (ring two), and a 180,965-hectare expansion area (ring three).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"trendas-000128#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The project area is not vacant land but is dominated by 162 concessions for mining, forestry, oil palm plantations, and coal power plants, many of which are linked to political figures and their families.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"trendas-000128#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Prominent figures linked to concessions in the IKN area include Sukanto Tanoto, Hashim Djojohadikusumo (brother of Prabowo Subianto), and Luhut Binsar Pandjaitan, whose companies have left 50 abandoned coal mining pits.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"trendas-000128#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The relocation threatens the indigenous Balik tribe in the first ring, who face potential displacement and the loss of traditional ways of life, similar to the historical displacement of the Betawi in Jakarta.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"trendas-000128#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The project risks destroying the mangrove ecosystem of Balikpapan Bay, which covers 12,418.75 hectares and serves as a critical protector against floods and tsunamis.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"trendas-000128#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Despite government claims of a 'green city' independent of fossil fuels, coal power plants continue to be constructed in East Kalimantan, and the new capital will likely be exposed to air pollution from these plants and forest fires.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"trendas-000128#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The total estimated cost of the project is Rp466 trillion, with the government exploring the sale or leasing of state assets in Jakarta, valued at Rp1,123 trillion, to help fund the relocation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"trendas-000128#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The report argues that the government's use of 'land freezing' and state-ownership claims may lead to forced evictions of villagers who lack formal land certificates.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"trendas-000128#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["energy transition","coal-fired power station","renewable energy","deforestation","land use","climate risk","air pollution","extractive industry","mining","forestry","environmental degradation"],"geography_discussed":["Jakarta","Balikpapan","Samarinda","Malaysia","Brazil"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["investigative report","policy critique","environmental impact assessment"]},{"id":"trendas-000132","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/trendas-000132","title":"RUANG SESAK OLIGARK DAN “PEMUTIHAN”","publisher":{"name":"Trend Asia","organization":"trend-asia"},"document_type":"report","language":"id","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://trendasia.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/FINAL-IKN-REPORT-BAHASA-34-Hal.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report argues that the relocation of Indonesia's capital to East Kalimantan is a 'mega project' designed to benefit political oligarchs and corporations rather than the public. It highlights that the proposed 180,965-hectare site is not empty land but is already occupied by numerous mining, forestry, and plantation concessions linked to high-ranking politicians and their families. The document warns of severe ecological risks, including the destruction of mangrove ecosystems in Balikpapan Bay, the persistence of coal-fired power plants (PLTU), and the displacement of indigenous groups like the Suku Balik. It further criticizes the lack of public participation and the financial instability of the project, which estimates a cost of Rp 466 trillion.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"trendas-000132#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The proposed New Capital City (IKN) area of 180,965 hectares is already heavily occupied by 162 concessions, including mining, forestry, palm oil, and coal-fired power plants (PLTU).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"trendas-000132#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The report identifies significant oligarchic control over the IKN land, specifically naming Sukanto Tanoto and Hashim Djojohadikusumo as dominant concession holders in the first and second rings.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"trendas-000132#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The project is suspected of serving as a mechanism for 'whitewashing' corporate environmental crimes, particularly regarding the failure to reclaim 94 coal mining pits within the IKN area.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"trendas-000132#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The relocation threatens the Suku Balik indigenous community in the first ring and risks repeating the historical displacement of the Betawi people from Jakarta.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"trendas-000132#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Despite government claims of a 'green city' powered by renewable energy, the report notes the continued construction of coal-fired power plants in East Kalimantan and the presence of PLTU Ridlatama Power in the third ring.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"trendas-000132#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The project poses a high risk to the Balikpapan Bay mangrove ecosystem, which is critical for carbon absorption and flood protection, with some areas of the first ring categorized as high-risk flood zones.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"trendas-000132#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The estimated cost of Rp 466 trillion is viewed as financially precarious, with the government considering the sale or lease of state assets in Jakarta (valued at Rp 1,123 trillion) to fund the project.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"trendas-000132#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Public sentiment is divided or negative, with surveys showing 39.8% of respondents nationwide and 95.7% of respondents in DKI Jakarta disagreeing with the relocation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"trendas-000132#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["renewable energy","coal-fired power station","deforestation","environmental degradation","climate risk","flood risk","extractive industry"],"geography_discussed":["Jakarta","North Paser of Penajam","Kutai Kartanegara","Balikpapan","Sepaku","Samboja","Muara Jawa","Loa Kulu"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy analysis","environmental impact assessment","political economy analysis"]}]}