{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"geography":["Asia-Pacific"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'Asia-Pacific' for facet 'geography' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":124,"relation":"eq"},"page":7,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?geography=Asia-Pacific&page=7","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"sei-001365","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/sei-001365","title":"INTEGRATING RIGHTS AND EQUALITY IN DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND CLIMATE RESILIENCE","publisher":{"name":"Stockholm Environment Institute","organization":"stockholm-environment-institute"},"document_type":"briefing","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/fire-brdr-implementation-brief.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document introduces the FIRE framework, which consists of six dimensions—fundamental rights and equality, non-discrimination, participation and access to information, governance systems and structures, agency and empowerment, and social norms and context—designed to guide decision-makers in integrating human rights and gender equality into disaster risk reduction (DRR) and climate resilience (CR). It argues that social inequality is a key driver of vulnerability and that standard data collection, such as sex-, age- and disability-disaggregated (SADD) data, is insufficient on its own to understand the root causes of risk. The brief provides specific guidance on applying these principles to risk assessments, risk-informed development and land-use planning, and emergency preparedness and response, including early warning, evacuation, and camp management.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001365#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The Framework for Integrating Rights and Equality (FIRE) is a six-dimensional guiding tool for national, sub-national, and local decision-makers to integrate human rights and gender equality into laws, policies, and practices for disaster risk reduction (DRR) and climate resilience (CR).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001365#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Current risk assessment practices often rely on a generic checklist approach or the collection of sex-, age- and disability-disaggregated (SADD) data, which the document asserts is insufficient for understanding the socio-economic root causes of vulnerability and exposure.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001365#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"To holistically assess risks, assessments must be reframed to examine root causes, including power dynamics in governance and the intersection of gender, age, disability, ethnicity, and socio-economic status.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001365#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Risk-informed development and land-use planning must move beyond infrastructural focus to prioritize access to services for disadvantaged groups and combat spatial and zoning inequalities.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001365#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A review of the Philippines' Comprehensive Land Use Planning Guidelines (CLUP) and Nepal's Local Disaster and Climate Resilience Plan (LDCRP) indicates that while these documents recognize social inclusion and vulnerable groups, they require further translation into guiding principles and affirmative policies to guarantee equality.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001365#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Emergency preparedness and response interventions—specifically early warning, evacuation, and camp management—must be rooted in local contexts and gender norms to prevent the marginalization of specific social groups.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001365#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["disaster risk reduction","climate resilience","human rights","gender equality","land-use planning","early warning system","intersectionality","Paris Agreement","Sustainable Development Goals"],"geography_discussed":["Philippines","Nepal","Cambodia","Myanmar","Pakistan","Sri Lanka"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["framework development","policy review","guideline provision"]},{"id":"sei-001366","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/sei-001366","title":"fire-infosheet-4a0cd6b112796e00.pdf","publisher":{"name":"Stockholm Environment Institute","organization":"stockholm-environment-institute"},"document_type":"fact sheet","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/fire-infosheet.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"This fact sheet introduces the Framework for Integrating Rights and Equality (FIRE), developed by the Building Resilience through Inclusive and Climate-adaptive Disaster Risk Reduction in Asia-Pacific (BRDR) Program. The framework provides a six-dimensional approach to integrate human rights and gender equality into disaster risk reduction (DRR) laws, policies, and practices from national to local levels.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001366#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The Framework for Integrating Rights and Equality (FIRE) was created by the Building Resilience through Inclusive and Climate-adaptive Disaster Risk Reduction in Asia-Pacific (BRDR) Program to address the tendency of DRR approaches to focus on either human rights or gender equality, but rarely both.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001366#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The FIRE approach consists of six dimensions designed to inform DRR law, policy, and practice: \n1. Fundamental rights and equality: Focuses on international standards and how gendered structures affect the enjoyment of rights and access to resources.\n2. Non-discrimination: Addresses inequality based on identities and socioeconomic characteristics, recognizing that these causes intersect.\n3. Participation and access to information: Promotes inclusive, gender-sensitive participation and the removal of barriers such as social norms and stereotypes.\n4. Governance systems and structures: Aims to improve DRR laws, accountability institutions, and civil society platforms to address institutionalized exclusion.\n5. Agency and empowerment: Focuses on strengthening the capacity of marginalized groups to exercise rights and influence policy.\n6. Social norms and context: Focuses on transforming the social and gender norms that produce inequality and vulnerability.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001366#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The BRDR program utilizes the FIRE framework to investigate how inclusive, rights-based, and gender-equal approaches are understood across different contexts to reduce gendered risk and ensure protection for all.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001366#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["disaster risk reduction","climate resilience","gender equality","human rights"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["framework"]},{"id":"sei-001398","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/sei-001398","title":"Guidance note: Integrating gender equality and human rights in SCF2 events","publisher":{"name":"Stockholm Environment Institute","organization":"stockholm-environment-institute"},"document_type":"guide","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/guidance-note-for-scf-events.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document outlines an integrated approach for SCF2 events that combines a human rights-based approach—divided into substantive and procedural rights—with intersectional gender analysis. It provides guiding questions for event proposals, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation to ensure that marginalized groups are included and that power dynamics are addressed to avoid reinforcing existing inequalities.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001398#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The document proposes a conceptual framework that mainstreams intersectional gender analysis into a human rights-based approach. This approach categorizes human rights into 'substantive rights', which relate to the 'substance and dignity of human beings', and 'procedural rights', which encompass 'Transparency, accountability, participation and access to justice'.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001398#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"To redress context-specific constraints, the guidance emphasizes a gender analysis of four specific components: the division of labour, access and control over resources, participation in decision-making, and the norms, rules, and dominant discourses that cause inequality.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001398#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The guidance warns that climate action and development projects that ignore human rights and gender equality risk strengthening existing social disparities, noting that marginalized groups are more vulnerable to environmental degradation and often excluded from decision-making.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001398#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The monitoring and evaluation (M&E) framework for SCF2 events requires data disaggregation by target groups, including gender (men/women/non-binaries), age, disability, and urban/rural status. Evaluation is conducted at two levels: the program level managed by SEI Asia and the event level managed by the grantees using pre- and post-event surveys to establish baseline and end-line data.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001398#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["gender equality","intersectionality","environmental governance","climate change mitigation","sustainable development"],"geography_discussed":["Bangkok","Sweden"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["guidance","framework"]},{"id":"wri-001057","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/wri-001057","title":"Locally Led Adaptation: From Principles to Practice","publisher":{"name":"World Resources Institute","organization":"world-resources-institute"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.wri.org/research/locally-led-adaptation-principles-practice","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The paper examines 21 examples of locally led adaptation (LLA) across Africa, Asia-Pacific, and the Caribbean and Latin America to provide strategies for financing and implementing resilience efforts. It argues that LLA redresses power imbalances by prioritizing the agency of local organizations and Indigenous peoples, who are often best positioned to identify adaptation solutions. The document recommends that funders and governments increase the volume and flexibility of climate finance, integrate social equity into standard processes, and shift governance to center local priorities.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-001057#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Locally led adaptation (LLA) aims to provide equitable access to financing and decision-making for local actors and communities, particularly those disproportionately vulnerable to climate change, while leveraging local knowledge and innovation for resilience.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-001057#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Implementing LLA is often complex because it requires significant departures from standard practices to redress historical power imbalances and prioritize local agency in governance and financing.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-001057#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A review of 21 LLA interventions across Africa, Asia-Pacific, and the Caribbean and Latin America demonstrates various successful mechanisms for delivering finance to local actors, including microfinance, loan funds, grants facilities, savings schemes, social protection schemes, domestic finance programs, national planning policies, and community-led early warning and emergency response systems.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-001057#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"To advance LLA, the paper recommends that institutions increase the amount, accessibility, and flexibility of climate finance, apply LLA principles holistically, invest in research to fill evidence gaps, and integrate social equity into standard decision-making processes.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-001057#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["Community based adaptation","climate finance","climate resilience","social equity","governance","indigenous people","early warning system","microfinance"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["review","policy recommendations"]}]}