{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"geography":["Americas"]},"warnings":[]},"total":{"value":425,"relation":"eq"},"page":22,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?geography=Americas&page=22","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"iisd-001126","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/iisd-001126","title":"Global research partnerships for sustainable trade policy","publisher":{"name":"International Institute for Sustainable Development","organization":"international-institute-for-sustainable-development"},"document_type":"fact sheet","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/brochure_tkn_2008.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Trade Knowledge Network (TKN), coordinated by the International Institute for Sustainable Development since 1998, is a global collaboration of research institutions across Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas. It focuses on strengthening research capacity in developing countries to generate policy analysis on the impacts of trade and investment on sustainable development. The TKN operates through four pillars: strengthening Southern research capacity, generating innovative policy research, connecting with policy-makers, and building a global research network. Its approach is 'Southern-driven,' ensuring research is executed within the local contexts where it is applied. Recent projects have addressed regional trade integration, commodity price volatility, food security in Africa linked to climate change and land degradation, and foreign direct investment incentives in Southeast Asia. Since 1998, the TKN has partnered with over 35 institutions in 28 countries and published more than 80 reports.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-001126#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The Trade Knowledge Network (TKN) is structured around four primary pillars: developing research and communication capacity in the developing world, facilitating cross-regional collaborative research, implementing strategies to influence policy-makers, and establishing global networks of individuals and organizations focused on trade, investment, and sustainable development.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-001126#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The TKN employs a 'Southern-driven' methodology, based on the belief that sustainable trade and investment policies require intimate local knowledge. Consequently, research is developed and executed within the specific countries and regions where it is applied, with regional coordinators managing their own agendas.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-001126#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The network has conducted diverse research projects, including a multi-continent study on the impact of regional trade agreements on political stability, case studies on managing volatile commodity prices for the 2.5 billion people reliant on primary commodities, and an investigation into the costs and benefits of investment incentives in Southeast Asia.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-001126#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"TKN research has specifically addressed food security challenges in Africa, noting that the combination of climate change, land degradation, falling crop yields, and population growth creates significant threats to African agriculture.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-001126#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Since its inception in 1998, the TKN has collaborated with more than 35 institutions across 28 countries and produced over 80 reports in nine different languages.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-001126#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["sustainable development","trade policy","climate change","land degradation","food security"],"geography_discussed":["Africa","Asia","Europe","Americas","Vietnam","South Africa","Malawi","Indonesia","Ecuador","Argentina","Pakistan","Cambodia","Nepal","Uganda"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["programmatic overview"]},{"id":"iisd-002255","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/iisd-002255","title":"A New Mechanism for Hemispheric Cooperation on Environmental Sustainability and Trade?","publisher":{"name":"International Institute for Sustainable Development","organization":"international-institute-for-sustainable-development"},"document_type":"briefing","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/trade_aea_draft_proposal.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document argues that the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) requires a dedicated hemispheric framework to ensure trade liberalization supports sustainable development. It reviews sub-regional models—including Mercosur, CARICOM, the Andean Community, the Central American Alliance for Sustainable Development, and NAFTA—to identify best practices in environmental management and civil society participation. The authors propose a new Americas Environmental Accord (AEA) based on the 2001 Mercosur Framework Agreement on the Environment, suggesting it include shared objectives for environmental protection, dispute settlement mechanisms, and protocols for natural resource management. Additionally, the paper recommends conducting ex-ante sustainability impact assessments (SIA) for the FTAA and establishing a Public Advisory Committee to foster inclusive dialogue between governments and civil society.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002255#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The authors propose a new, stand-alone Americas Environmental Accord (AEA) to provide a coherent ecological cooperation agenda and financing for the Western Hemisphere, using the 2001 Mercosur Framework Agreement on the Environment as a substantive starting point.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002255#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"To prevent policy inconsistency in the FTAA, the document recommends using sustainability impact assessments (SIA) ex-ante to identify negative environmental effects and develop liberalization sequencing options.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002255#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The 2001 Mercosur Framework Agreement on the Environment is highlighted as an integrated instrument that seeks sustainable development through economic, social, and environmental dimensions, including provisions for upward harmonization of management systems.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002255#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The North American Agreement for Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC) is cited as a strong model for openness due to its mandates for public reports on the state of the environment and requirements for the Council to hold public meetings.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002255#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Caribbean Community (CARICOM) is noted for its advanced formal mechanisms for civil society participation, specifically through the ratification of a Civil Society Charter in 1997.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002255#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The document suggests establishing a Standing Conference or Public Advisory Committee to facilitate dialogue between senior government officials, NGOs, and the private sector to build consensus on a trade and sustainability agenda.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002255#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["sustainable development","biodiversity","renewable energy","environmental impact assessment","natural resource management","climate finance"],"geography_discussed":["Mercosur","Caribbean Community","Andean Community","Central America","North America","Canada","Chile","Mexico","United States","Costa Rica"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy proposal","comparative analysis"]},{"id":"prio-001298","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/prio-001298","title":"Conflict trends: A global overview, 1946–2025","publisher":{"name":"Peace Research Institute Oslo","organization":"peace-research-institute-oslo"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/6f3c619f-6267-4d6b-be19-7bb16dfad782/Conflict trends A global overview 1946-2025 - PRIO Paper 2026.pdf?inline=true","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report finds that 2025 was the third most violent year since 1989, with 245,000 battle-related deaths. It highlights a record high of 65 state-based conflicts and a concerning doubling of international conflicts to eight in 2025. While non-state conflicts decreased slightly, one-sided violence surged to 76,500 fatalities, primarily driven by massacres in Sudan.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001298#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"In 2025, total battle-related deaths reached approximately 245,000, making it the third most violent year since 1989. This level of violence was primarily driven by the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the bombardments of Gaza, and political violence in Sudan, specifically the massacre in El Fasher.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001298#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The number of state-based conflicts reached an all-time high of 65 in 2025 across 35 countries. There is a growing trend of conflict complexity, where individual countries host multiple simultaneous conflicts; for example, Myanmar had five civil conflicts and Israel had two civil and three international conflicts in 2025.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001298#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Interstate conflicts have increased substantially, doubling from four in 2024 to eight in 2025, the highest number recorded since 1946. These are categorized as border conflicts (e.g., India and Pakistan), regional escalatory conflicts in the Middle East, and invasions (Russia's invasion of Ukraine and Israel's invasion of Syria).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001298#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"One-sided violence against civilians saw a dramatic increase from 14,200 fatalities in 2024 to 76,500 in 2025, the highest since the 1994 Rwandan genocide. This surge was largely due to the RSF takeover of El Fasher in Sudan, where approximately 60,000 people were killed in the last week of October 2025.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001298#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Non-state conflicts decreased slightly from 79 in 2024 to 75 in 2025, with battle-related deaths falling to approximately 14,500. This decline was partly due to reduced lethal violence between drug cartels in Mexico, although other forms of violence like extortion and abductions increased.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001298#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Regional analysis shows Africa as the most affected area, with the number of state-based conflicts nearly doubling from 15 in 2013 to 29 in 2025. Other notable regional trends include a record high of 13 conflicts in the Middle East and a surge in violence in Haiti, where battle deaths rose from 200 in 2024 to over 1,200 in 2025.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001298#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":[],"geography_discussed":["Ukraine","Sudan","Palestine","Myanmar","Israel","Afghanistan","Cameroon","Mali","Nigeria","Pakistan","Mexico","Africa","Americas","Brazil","Colombia","Tanzania","Ethiopia","Democratic Republic of the Congo","Syria","India","Thailand","Cambodia","Haiti","Russia","Middle East","Asia","Europe"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["statistical analysis","trend analysis","regional comparison"]},{"id":"prio-001506","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/prio-001506","title":"Justice during armed conflict: A new dataset on government and rebel strategies","publisher":{"name":"Peace Research Institute Oslo","organization":"peace-research-institute-oslo"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/6b139e81-28a9-4f2f-92e6-ac563715f2a1/Justice during Armed Conflict A New Dataset on Government and Rebel Strategies.pdf?inline=true","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The authors present the During-Conflict Justice (DCJ) dataset, which catalogues 2,205 justice processes across 204 internal armed conflicts in 108 countries between 1946 and 2011. The research identifies that DCJ is a common tool, appearing in over 60% of conflicts since WWII, with governments being the primary adopters (70.4%). The study finds that democratic governments are more likely to use DCJ, particularly trials, truth commissions, and reparations, compared to autocracies. Rebel groups tend to use DCJ more frequently when fighting democracies and as their own relative military strength increases. Analysis suggests that government-initiated DCJ is correlated with a reduction in battle deaths in the following year and a higher likelihood of the conflict ending in a negotiated settlement rather than a military victory.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001506#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The During-Conflict Justice (DCJ) dataset covers 2,205 justice processes across 204 internal armed conflicts in 108 countries from 1946 to 2011, revealing that over 60 percent of conflicts since the Second World War included at least one DCJ process.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001506#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Governments are the dominant users of DCJ, initiating 70.4% of all processes, while rebel groups are responsible for 10.3%. Rebels are more likely to employ trials, purges, and amnesties than capacity-intensive processes like reparations and truth commissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001506#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Democratic governments are more likely to utilize DCJ than anocracies or autocracies, particularly in the use of trials, truth commissions, and reparations to investigate and remedy wrongdoings involving civilians.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001506#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The use of trials has increased significantly since 1946, with a notable rise in the mid-1990s that exceeds the overall increase in the number of ongoing armed conflicts, aligning with the 'justice cascade' theory.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001506#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is an inverse relationship between rebel strength and government DCJ use; as rebels become stronger, government use of DCJ decreases. Conversely, rebel use of DCJ increases as they gain strength and capacity.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001506#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Government-initiated DCJ is associated with a decrease in conflict intensity; 38% of conflict years with government DCJ saw a reduction in battle deaths the following year, compared to 19% for years without such processes.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001506#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The likelihood of a conflict ending in a negotiated settlement doubles when the government initiates at least one DCJ process, while the likelihood of a military victory decreases from 37% to 23%.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001506#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":[],"geography_discussed":["Uganda","Sri Lanka","Thailand","Israel","Peru","Guatemala","Ethiopia","Bangladesh","India","Haiti","Angola","Liberia","Rwanda","Nepal","Middle East","Europe","Asia","Africa","Americas"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["quantitative analysis","dataset introduction","cross-national study"]},{"id":"prio-001633","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/prio-001633","title":"Conflict Trends in the Middle East, 1989–2019","publisher":{"name":"Peace Research Institute Oslo","organization":"peace-research-institute-oslo"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/b48895e9-5c53-487e-ab23-b2f12c227725/Palik Rustad Harpviken Methi - Conflict Trends in the Middle East 1989-2019 PRIO Paper 2020.pdf?inline=true","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","geography_discussed"],"summary":{"text":"The Middle East has hosted the world's deadliest conflicts over the last decade, with Syria being the deadliest since 1989. While state-based conflicts and battle-related deaths declined in 2019, internationalized civil wars reached record levels since 2015. Non-state conflicts peaked in 2014 and have since declined, though they remain higher than pre-2011 levels. One-sided violence fatalities doubled from 2018 to 2019, driven by IS, Syrian insurgents, and Iran. Despite an increase in ceasefires, peace agreements are rare in the region compared to Africa and Asia, with only one full peace agreement recorded between 1989 and 2018.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001633#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The Middle East has been the site of the world's deadliest conflicts over the last ten years, with Syria specifically being the deadliest conflict globally since 1989.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001633#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"State-based conflicts in the Middle East saw a relative increase over the last six years, though 2019 marked the first decrease in such conflicts since 2007, with 10 conflicts recorded compared to 12 in 2018.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001633#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Battle-related deaths in the region have steadily declined since 2014, largely due to de-escalation in Iraq and Syria, falling from 18,971 in 2018 to 10,625 in 2019.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001633#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Internationalized civil wars, involving foreign governments with troops, have reached their highest level since 2015, with four out of five civil wars in 2019 experiencing external interventions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001633#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Conflicts fought over government incompatibility increased substantially after 2004, peaking in 2018 and 2019 with six wars, the highest number since 1946.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001633#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Ceasefires in the Middle East peaked in 2016 with 48 recorded, primarily in Syria and Yemen, including a record 25 humanitarian ceasefires in 2015.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001633#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Peace agreements are rare in the Middle East compared to other regions; only one full peace agreement was recorded between 1989 and 2018, which was the 1990 unification of North and South Yemen.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001633#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Non-state conflicts peaked in 2014 with 37 conflicts and have since declined to 8 in 2019, though they remain significantly higher than pre-2011 levels.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001633#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Fatalities from one-sided violence in the Middle East doubled from 54 in 2018 to 108 in 2019, primarily caused by the Government of Iran, IS, and Syrian insurgents.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001633#insight-9","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":[],"geography_discussed":["Syria","Afghanistan","Iran","Egypt","Israel","Lebanon","Africa","Asia","Americas","Europe"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":[]}]}