{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"climate_tags":["ocean economy"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'ocean economy' for facet 'climate_tags' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":2,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?climate_tags=ocean+economy","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"glorespar-000046","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/glorespar-000046","title":"Indicator-based tools for assessing ocean risks and vulnerabilities","publisher":{"name":"Global Resilience Partnership","organization":"global-resilience-partnership"},"document_type":"briefing","language":"en","date_published":"2022-12-19","source_url":"https://www.globalresiliencepartnership.org/resource/indicator-based-tools-for-assessing-ocean-risks-and-vulnerabilities/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"This briefing provides an overview of indicator-based tools used to assess ocean risks and vulnerabilities, based on a systematic review of grey literature and peer-reviewed articles. It highlights a tendency to focus on climate change over other risks and notes significant data gaps in specific developing regions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glorespar-000046#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The systematic review of indicator-based tools revealed that there is an uneven focus on specific risks, with climate change being disproportionately emphasized compared to other ocean risks. Furthermore, most studies fail to account for the cumulative impacts and complex interlinkages between different risk types.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glorespar-000046#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Significant data gaps hinder the assessment of risks in coastal least developed countries (LDCs) and small island developing states (SIDS) within Sub-Saharan Africa.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glorespar-000046#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Future research priorities include developing methods to understand cumulative impacts from multiple stressors, implementing regular socioeconomic and environmental surveys in data-poor areas, and utilizing data-poor assessment methods like fuzzy logic to address data challenges.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glorespar-000046#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["climate change","ocean economy","risk assessment","vulnerability"],"geography_discussed":["sub-Saharan Africa"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["Systematic Review"]},{"id":"cer-000097","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/cer-000097","title":"181030mandates-539bf707550ad7ef.pdf","publisher":{"name":"Centre for Environmental Rights","organization":"centre-for-environmental-rights"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/181030mandates.pdf?x21779","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"This document consists of negotiating mandates and reports from several South African provincial legislatures—Free State, Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal, Mpumalanga, North West, and Western Cape—regarding the Marine Spatial Planning Bill [B 9D-2017]. The provinces generally support the Bill, which aims to establish a framework for marine spatial planning, coordinate ocean use across multiple sectors, and promote a sustainable ocean economy, while proposing various amendments related to governance, definitions, and inclusivity.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000097#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The Marine Spatial Planning Bill [B 9D-2017] aims to create a coordinated system for managing South Africa's ocean economy, including territorial waters (12 nautical miles from the baseline), the Exclusive Economic Zone (200 nautical miles from the baseline), and the extended continental shelf, including areas around the Prince Edward Islands.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000097#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The Gauteng Provincial Legislature identifies significant potential economic benefits from the Bill, estimating that the ocean economy could contribute R177 billion to the national economy by 2023 and create between 800,000 and 1 million job opportunities.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000097#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Parliament proposes that the National Working Group on Marine Spatial Planning be expanded beyond government officials to include representatives from the environmental private sector and independent civil society to ensure a better balance of representation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000097#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The Western Cape Provincial Parliament suggests that the Bill lacks necessary definitions for 'Marine Spatial Planning', 'freshwater bodies' (to clarify the Bill's non-applicability to inland waters), and 'Knowledge and information system'.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000097#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Several provinces expressed concerns regarding the inclusivity of the Bill's governance structures. The Western Cape argues that the Directors-General Committee lacks provincial and municipal representation, which is essential since terrestrial areas adjacent to the ocean are directly affected by marine spatial planning.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000097#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The Mpumalanga Provincial Legislature's public hearings revealed community concerns regarding security, the protection of the marine environment from waste, and the need for a state-owned entity to prevent bias in the allocation of business rights.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000097#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Parliament recommends shortening the review period for marine area plans from five years to three years.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000097#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["ocean economy","marine spatial planning","environmental governance","sustainable resource use"],"geography_discussed":["Prince Edward Islands","Johannesburg","Margate","St Lucia","Durban"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["Legislative Review","Public Consultation Report","Policy Mandate"]}]}