{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"climate_tags":["judicial review"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'judicial review' for facet 'climate_tags' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":2,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?climate_tags=judicial+review","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"natjust-000067","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/natjust-000067","title":"Block 5 6 7 off Western Cape coast between Cape Town and Cape Agulhas","publisher":{"name":"Natural Justice","organization":"natural-justice"},"document_type":"fact sheet","language":"en","date_published":"2025-05-02","source_url":"https://naturaljustice.org/publication/factsheet-block-5-6-7-off-western-cape-coast-between-cape-town-and-cape-agulhas/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"A factsheet detailing a judicial review application filed by The Green Connection and Natural Justice to challenge the environmental authorisation granted to Total Energies EP South Africa (TEEPSA) Block 567 (Pty) Ltd for oil and gas exploration drilling off the Western Cape coast.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"natjust-000067#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"In March 2024, The Green Connection and Natural Justice applied for a judicial review in the Western Cape High Court to contest the environmental authorisation given to Total Energies EP South Africa (TEEPSA) Block 567 (Pty) Ltd (Total) for oil and gas exploration drilling between Cape Town and Cape Agulhas.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"natjust-000067#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The environmental authorisation being challenged was issued by the Director-General: Mineral Resources and Energy in April 2023 and subsequently upheld by the Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment, who dismissed 18 appeals regarding the decision.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"natjust-000067#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["oil and gas exploration","environmental authorisation","judicial review","western cape"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["Legal challenge summary"]},{"id":"cer-000224","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/cer-000224","title":"RICHARDS BAY GAS POWER 2 (PTY) LTD – ENVIRONMENTAL AUTHORISATION AMENDMENT","publisher":{"name":"Centre for Environmental Rights","organization":"centre-for-environmental-rights"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2022-02-18","source_url":"https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/20220218-Letter-to-the-DFFE.pdf?x21779","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Centre for Environmental Rights, acting for groundWork, has requested an extension of the time period to institute judicial review proceedings against the Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment's decision to grant an Environmental Authorisation Amendment for Richards Bay Gas Power (Pty) Ltd.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000224#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The Centre for Environmental Rights, representing the non-profit environmental justice organisation groundWork, is seeking an extension under section 9(1) of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 (PAJA) to file for judicial review of a decision made by Minister Barbara Creecy.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000224#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The request for extension is based on the delayed receipt of the Air and Climate Change Report (ACCR), which was furnished to the client on 09 February 2022. This report was used by the Minister to conclude that climate change impacts of the amendments were adequately considered, despite the report not being part of the record available to interested and affected parties or the decision-maker initially.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000224#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"groundWork contends that the decision to grant the amendment was unreasonable because the Minister relied on irrelevant considerations and ignored critical comments that would have been available if the ACCR had been included in the public participation process.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000224#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The appellant proposes to bring the review application within 60 days of the letter dated 18 February 2022, noting that if the extension is refused, they will seek it or condonation from the Court.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000224#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["climate change","energy transition","environmental authorisation","judicial review"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["legal request","administrative appeal"]}]}